|
Re: B&O Wagontop Comparison
From photos I've seen, the Exactrail car appears to have better
underframe details. On the other hand, besides the doors, Fox Valley
allows their cars to be custom decorated (Spring Mills) so if
From photos I've seen, the Exactrail car appears to have better
underframe details. On the other hand, besides the doors, Fox Valley
allows their cars to be custom decorated (Spring Mills) so if
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#104734
·
|
|
Re: B&O Wagontop Comparison
Agreed 100%, Charlie. Bob Higgins was one of the best reviewers we have ever had in this hobby. It is unfortunate that he is not still with us even though his reviews were limited to motive power.
Agreed 100%, Charlie. Bob Higgins was one of the best reviewers we have ever had in this hobby. It is unfortunate that he is not still with us even though his reviews were limited to motive power.
|
By
Don <riverman_vt@...>
·
#104749
·
|
|
Re: B&O Wagontop Comparison
Charlie Vlk, thank you for your comments on comparison of models with drawing and/or photos of the actual car(s) being modelled.
I find that approach most meaningful. I appreciate learning about the
Charlie Vlk, thank you for your comments on comparison of models with drawing and/or photos of the actual car(s) being modelled.
I find that approach most meaningful. I appreciate learning about the
|
By
rogergperkins <roger.perkins@...>
·
#104733
·
|
|
Re: Reweigh rules
Norm Buckhart wrote:
Norm, it depends on car type, among other things. I made a table of the rules for the late 1930s to 1960s, which was supposed to be in the article I did on reweigh dates
Norm Buckhart wrote:
Norm, it depends on car type, among other things. I made a table of the rules for the late 1930s to 1960s, which was supposed to be in the article I did on reweigh dates
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#104732
·
|
|
Re: B&O Wagontop Comparison
Greg and Steve-
In a way, I agree with both of you….
…..IMHO, the reviews we get are overblown ego trips of the reviewer or gratis further exposure for advertisers. “Look how much I know
Greg and Steve-
In a way, I agree with both of you….
…..IMHO, the reviews we get are overblown ego trips of the reviewer or gratis further exposure for advertisers. “Look how much I know
|
By
Charlie Vlk
·
#104731
·
|
|
Re: Reweigh rules
On Nov 30, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Norm Buckhart wrote:
> that may be enough information. So as I understand it - for a car say
> built Dec 1945, the first reweigh date would be in 36 months - or Dec
On Nov 30, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Norm Buckhart wrote:
> that may be enough information. So as I understand it - for a car say
> built Dec 1945, the first reweigh date would be in 36 months - or Dec
|
By
Guy Wilber
·
#104730
·
|
|
4th Update Official list of Shake N Take 2012
Here is the fourth update:
Folks here is the official list as of just about #PM PST:
Primary List:
1. Rich Hanke
2. Rick Devlin
3. Armand Premo
4. Denny Anspach
5. John Cantlay
6. Jerry Glow
7.
Here is the fourth update:
Folks here is the official list as of just about #PM PST:
Primary List:
1. Rich Hanke
2. Rick Devlin
3. Armand Premo
4. Denny Anspach
5. John Cantlay
6. Jerry Glow
7.
|
By
Greg Martin
·
#104729
·
|
|
Re: Reweigh rules
I just looked this up as I was applying proper dates to cars. According to
my 1/53 ORER, page 753, under Rule 11 of Code of Car Service Rules the first
reweigh for all steel house cars was 30 months
I just looked this up as I was applying proper dates to cars. According to
my 1/53 ORER, page 753, under Rule 11 of Code of Car Service Rules the first
reweigh for all steel house cars was 30 months
|
By
william darnaby
·
#104728
·
|
|
Re: Reweigh rules
that may be enough information. So as I understand it - for a car say
built Dec 1945, the first reweigh date would be in 36 months - or Dec
1948, but then the second reweigh date might be Dec 51 or
that may be enough information. So as I understand it - for a car say
built Dec 1945, the first reweigh date would be in 36 months - or Dec
1948, but then the second reweigh date might be Dec 51 or
|
By
Norm Buckhart
·
#104727
·
|
|
Re: Reweigh rules
Guy Wilber replied:
And after 1948 (I forget the month) reweigh for most cars after the first reweigh was 48 months, not 36.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley,
Guy Wilber replied:
And after 1948 (I forget the month) reweigh for most cars after the first reweigh was 48 months, not 36.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley,
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#104726
·
|
|
Re: B&O Wagontop Comparison
Bob and all,
I fully understand that all models have some compromises; however, what drove my comment is that I see no reason to compare a model to a model until they are all compared to drawings. I
Bob and all,
I fully understand that all models have some compromises; however, what drove my comment is that I see no reason to compare a model to a model until they are all compared to drawings. I
|
By
Greg Martin
·
#104725
·
|
|
Re: 3rd Update Official list of Shake N Take 2012
Bill,
I don't recall seeing the message. I will add him in as an alternate for the hand out.
Greg
Bill,
I don't recall seeing the message. I will add him in as an alternate for the hand out.
Greg
|
By
Greg Martin
·
#104724
·
|
|
Re: Reweigh rules
wow - ok - generally around 1936-1955. I'm working on boxcar decals during this period. Norm
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
wow - ok - generally around 1936-1955. I'm working on boxcar decals during this period. Norm
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
By
Norm Buckhart
·
#104723
·
|
|
Re: Reweigh rules
Norm Buckhart wrote:
Interchange Rule 30. What year, what car construction, and information do you seek? The Rule and charts cover three pages. Bear in mind that subsequent reweigh periods were
Norm Buckhart wrote:
Interchange Rule 30. What year, what car construction, and information do you seek? The Rule and charts cover three pages. Bear in mind that subsequent reweigh periods were
|
By
Guy Wilber
·
#104722
·
|
|
Re: B&O Wagontop Comparison
Since when has the non-existence of a model stopped anyone on this list from commenting on its accuracy?
Richard Townsend
Lincoln City, Oregon
Since when has the non-existence of a model stopped anyone on this list from commenting on its accuracy?
Richard Townsend
Lincoln City, Oregon
|
By
Richard Townsend
·
#104747
·
|
|
Reweigh rules
can anyone sight the Rule number and language that requires 3 year reweighing of cars. thanks in advance, Norm Buckhart
can anyone sight the Rule number and language that requires 3 year reweighing of cars. thanks in advance, Norm Buckhart
|
By
Norm Buckhart
·
#104721
·
|
|
Re: B&O Circle T stencil, was Fox Valley (and ExactRail) B&O Wagontop
Seems like it would be the same principle which causes 65' mill gondolas to be built narrower than 50'-53' gons. Additional length pushes width and/or height farther out on the clearance gauge, that
Seems like it would be the same principle which causes 65' mill gondolas to be built narrower than 50'-53' gons. Additional length pushes width and/or height farther out on the clearance gauge, that
|
By
Scott Pitzer
·
#104720
·
|
|
Re: 3rd Update Official list of Shake N Take 2012
Greg
I do not see Dan Smith's name on the Alternate Handout list. When we talked on the phone yesterday, Dan said he had sent you a message requesting inclusion on this list. Can you make sure he is
Greg
I do not see Dan Smith's name on the Alternate Handout list. When we talked on the phone yesterday, Dan said he had sent you a message requesting inclusion on this list. Can you make sure he is
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#104719
·
|
|
Re: B&O Circle T stencil, was Fox Valley (and ExactRail) B&O Wagontop
"50-foot cars did not fit the Parkersburg Subdivision clearances until the 1957 clearances program. After this time, some 50' boxcars did see the circle T as they left captive service, mainly
"50-foot cars did not fit the Parkersburg Subdivision clearances until the 1957 clearances program. After this time, some 50' boxcars did see the circle T as they left captive service, mainly
|
By
Todd Horton
·
#104718
·
|
|
B&O Circle T stencil, was Fox Valley (and ExactRail) B&O Wagontop
I would add some more detail to Bob Witt's post about the B&O circle T stencil.
Circle T meant fit for less-than-carload service, specifically:
- clean car
- mechanically sound
- meets main
I would add some more detail to Bob Witt's post about the B&O circle T stencil.
Circle T meant fit for less-than-carload service, specifically:
- clean car
- mechanically sound
- meets main
|
By
Jim Mischke
·
#104717
·
|