|
Re: New Shapes to come
I don't think you're going to find a specialized shape like rail much cheaper than nickel silver esp if you can salvage the rail from used track.
Jerry Glow
I don't think you're going to find a specialized shape like rail much cheaper than nickel silver esp if you can salvage the rail from used track.
Jerry Glow
|
By
jerryglow2
·
#109500
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
I had the same situation when making a coil load of real soft iron wire. I made one wrap coils on the bottom layer and multiple wrap ones on top.
I just can't see any manufacturer making plastic rail
I had the same situation when making a coil load of real soft iron wire. I made one wrap coils on the bottom layer and multiple wrap ones on top.
I just can't see any manufacturer making plastic rail
|
By
jerryglow2
·
#109499
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
Bud Rindfleisch
By
Bud Rindfleisch
·
#109498
·
|
|
Re: new Canadian 8-hatch reefer
FWIIW: In Classic Freight Cars Vol. 3 by John Henderson are 3 pics of CN 8-hatch reefers: 1 with hinged doors, photographed at
Ft. Worth, TX and 2 w. plugdoors pictured at Kansas City, Missouri and
FWIIW: In Classic Freight Cars Vol. 3 by John Henderson are 3 pics of CN 8-hatch reefers: 1 with hinged doors, photographed at
Ft. Worth, TX and 2 w. plugdoors pictured at Kansas City, Missouri and
|
By
de Vries <bjdevries01@...>
·
#109497
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
I would have an interst in buying code 83 rail. How much is the question. I can think of several projects but the quantity of 6 piece package is great; just one per project.
Jim
I would have an interst in buying code 83 rail. How much is the question. I can think of several projects but the quantity of 6 piece package is great; just one per project.
Jim
|
By
James Babcock
·
#109496
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
Jerry
One problem with real rail is WEIGHT. A gondola or flat that weighs
the NMRA recommended amount (or even more than that) becomes ridiculously
heavy with a full (realistic) load of nickel silver
Jerry
One problem with real rail is WEIGHT. A gondola or flat that weighs
the NMRA recommended amount (or even more than that) becomes ridiculously
heavy with a full (realistic) load of nickel silver
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#109495
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
Jerry
I consided myself as the average modeler. So I want to build and
detail a track gane center with some out buildings and with one
or two piles of different sizes of rail and have a section
Jerry
I consided myself as the average modeler. So I want to build and
detail a track gane center with some out buildings and with one
or two piles of different sizes of rail and have a section
|
By
Ed <nprybiged@...>
·
#109494
·
|
|
National Perishable Freight Committee's "Icing Stations" publication
I recently discovered that by September 1936 the National Perishable
Freight Committee was publishing a booklet entitled Icing Stations.
As recently as 1929, this list had appeared with a slightly
I recently discovered that by September 1936 the National Perishable
Freight Committee was publishing a booklet entitled Icing Stations.
As recently as 1929, this list had appeared with a slightly
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#109493
·
|
|
Re: Evergreen--hat section? And more?
Tim,
If you want injection molded parts, then why bother Evergreen, who are not an injection-molding company? Why not find a mfr of plastic freight cars to do the hat-sections? You might even
Tim,
If you want injection molded parts, then why bother Evergreen, who are not an injection-molding company? Why not find a mfr of plastic freight cars to do the hat-sections? You might even
|
By
Aley, Jeff A
·
#109492
·
|
|
The B&O Modeler - July/August 2011
All,
The July/August 2011 issue of The B&O Modeler is uploaded to the Society website
at
http://www.borhs.org/modelermag/index.html
featuring the following articles:
Modeling B&O’S Class I-13
All,
The July/August 2011 issue of The B&O Modeler is uploaded to the Society website
at
http://www.borhs.org/modelermag/index.html
featuring the following articles:
Modeling B&O’S Class I-13
|
By
Benjamin Hom
·
#109491
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
Bill and Jerry,
The initial posting (if I'm remembering correctly) dealt with the possibilirty of modeling a "welded rail train"... which cannot be done with actual rail due to it's rigidity. There
Bill and Jerry,
The initial posting (if I'm remembering correctly) dealt with the possibilirty of modeling a "welded rail train"... which cannot be done with actual rail due to it's rigidity. There
|
By
John Degnan <Scaler164@...>
·
#109490
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
--- In STMFC@..., "Bill Schneider" <bschneider424@...> wrote:
Assuming the gon load or scenic use, then wouldn’t 39 scale feet work better?
>
> Bill Schneider
>
> I don't understand
--- In STMFC@..., "Bill Schneider" <bschneider424@...> wrote:
Assuming the gon load or scenic use, then wouldn’t 39 scale feet work better?
>
> Bill Schneider
>
> I don't understand
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#109489
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
Thanks Jerry, I was wondering that myself!
For the few places on my layout that I needed rail shapes I used cut-off bits of rail. About the only place that I really could see a use for plastic rail
Thanks Jerry, I was wondering that myself!
For the few places on my layout that I needed rail shapes I used cut-off bits of rail. About the only place that I really could see a use for plastic rail
|
By
Bill Schneider
·
#109488
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
I don't understand the need for it - what's wrong with real rail?
Jerry Glow
I don't understand the need for it - what's wrong with real rail?
Jerry Glow
|
By
jerryglow2
·
#109487
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
Thanks Bill
Ed
By
Ed <nprybiged@...>
·
#109486
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
John
I don't think Evergreen would be susceptible to anything longer
than 36" as this would present shipping and displaying problems.
I have taken two structural shapes and put them together
John
I don't think Evergreen would be susceptible to anything longer
than 36" as this would present shipping and displaying problems.
I have taken two structural shapes and put them together
|
By
Ed <nprybiged@...>
·
#109485
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
Hello Mike and Group,
Let's not complicate things...
White material is OK. I believe that most of us would paint and weather our own and white is a good place to start.
Cheers,
Bill Keene
Irvine,
Hello Mike and Group,
Let's not complicate things...
White material is OK. I believe that most of us would paint and weather our own and white is a good place to start.
Cheers,
Bill Keene
Irvine,
|
By
William Keene <wakeene@...>
·
#109484
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
I'd vote for rail-shapes in various cross sections as well -- very useful when the rest of the structure is in styrene.
I'd also vote for molding the rail-shapes in a "rail brown" color.
I'd vote for rail-shapes in various cross sections as well -- very useful when the rest of the structure is in styrene.
I'd also vote for molding the rail-shapes in a "rail brown" color.
|
By
MDelvec952
·
#109483
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
Hi Ed, and All,
I would be interested in the code 83 and 55 in long lengths. This is a much needed item for detailing many structures. It was often used for making fences and hose racks, etc
Hi Ed, and All,
I would be interested in the code 83 and 55 in long lengths. This is a much needed item for detailing many structures. It was often used for making fences and hose racks, etc
|
By
Michael Watnoski
·
#109482
·
|
|
Re: New Shapes to come
Ron
I have dealt in designing model projects in the NPRHA and have
found when we did a model and produced it in HO scale the
first thing we heard was "when are you going to do this in
N Scale?" and
Ron
I have dealt in designing model projects in the NPRHA and have
found when we did a model and produced it in HO scale the
first thing we heard was "when are you going to do this in
N Scale?" and
|
By
Ed <nprybiged@...>
·
#109481
·
|