main@RealSTMFC.groups.io

Re: GAC Pfaulder Milk Reefers in freight service

Charlie, It is in the file section in the second alpabetical section. Rick Dietrichson ---- Charlie Vlk <cvlk@...> wrote:

By rdietrichson · #109671 ·

Re: New format?

Having had to use it a few times now it really is no big deal. Actually little different in function than the old format albeit a definite difference in form.

By John Hagen · #109670 ·

Re: GAC Pfaulder Milk Reefers in freight service

Main site, files section. AL B.

By al_brown03 · #109669 ·

Re: GAC Pfaulder Milk Reefers in freight service

Where is the file? Could someone provide a link..it doesn't show up in the new photos section and trying to find it in the photos and files sections I didn't see it either. Is it on the main site or

By Charlie Vlk · #109668 ·

Re: GAC Pfaulder Milk Reefers in freight service

The file is called ACL912ROCKYMT-1200.jpg Car in question is the second one behind the growlythings. Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.

By al_brown03 · #109667 ·

Re: New format?

I agree. The new format is a pain in the butt. How can we get back to the old format? Ray

By George R. Stilwell, Jr. <GRSJr@...> · #109665 ·

Re: GAC Pfaulder Milk Reefers in freight service

Warren's photo is posted in the Files section as ACL 912. Thanks for any help on this. Bill McCoy Jax, FL

By Bill McCoy · #109664 ·

Re: GAC Pfaulder Milk Reefers in freight service

Unfortunately I cannot find the photo you refer to in the photo section under "ACL", "Calloway", GPEX, or "milk car" but expect you are probably refering to 6,000 gal. capacity cars of orange

By Don <riverman_vt@...> · #109666 ·

Re: Identify the Mystery Truck

It seems I didn't upload the picture properly. But googling National Type B turned up some images that matched my truck so the mystery is solved. I hadn't heard of a National Type B truck from the

By WACampbell · #109662 ·

Railway Prototype Cyclopedia Trade

This is a long shot but I will see what happens. I have Railway Prototype Cyclopedia Vols. 9, 10, 15, 19 and 22. I somehow acquired 2 copies of Vol. 19. It is in new condition. Maybe you have a

By Bill Lane · #109663 ·

Re: Lumber Loads on Flat Cars and in Box Cars

I have photos from ten years in the future, referenced from the cutoff date of this list, showing dimensional lumber loosely stacked on flatcars, and one case of a mixed wrapped and non-wrapped load,

By mopacfirst · #109661 ·

Re: Lumber Loads on Flat Cars and in Box Cars

As usual, Guy has lots of documentation, so I stand corrected (at least partly). I would still maintain that large-scale shipment of plastic-wrapped packaged lumber was largely a '60s phenomenon,

By Richard Hendrickson · #109660 ·

Re: Identify the Mystery Truck

I tried to use the link to look at the truck but there isn't a photo in that albumn. Please advise. Sincerely, Rich Yoder

By Rich Yoder · #109659 ·

Re: Advice Regarding Best Adhesives

Nelson, You could be right about carpenter's glue (from Elmers) being an aliphatic resin. It is a lot more resistant to water ... but I've seen it let go if the joint was wet enough and long

By Jim Betz · #109658 ·

Re: ADMIN: Re: The new format

Wayne Inbc1 [ odd last name, but...] writes: "I appologize for missing what is probably obvious, but I don't see a link to the group rules anywhere. How do we access them? " It's actually quite

By Mikebrock · #109657 ·

Re: Identify the Mystery Truck

Wayne, The photo hasn't been approved yet, but I'll take a stab National type B Regards Bruce Smith Auburn, Al ________________________________________ Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 12:14 PM To:

By Bruce Smith · #109656 ·

Identify the Mystery Truck

I came across this odd truck at a museum on Vancouver island. It seems to be marked: NATIONAL COILEAP TYPE B ARA 23 I am labelling some of my photos and would like to add a proper description.

By WACampbell · #109654 ·

ADMIN: Re: The new format

I appologize for missing what is probably obvious, but I don't see a link to the group rules anywhere. How do we access them?

By WACampbell · #109655 ·

ADMIN: Re: The new format

As all members of the STMFC are aware...you read the group rules, right?...this subject is out of scope ON the group. However, it is entirely within scope to inquire about such matters directly to me

By Mikebrock · #109653 ·

The new format

The new format is a swift pain in the A** How can I get back to the old list format?

By generalrailwaysignal <GRSJr@...> · #109652 ·

Messages