Small-run reprints likely won't make sense for either the publisher or the purchaser, but perhaps RPC might consider electronic distribution on reprints, or even first-purchase. In this day-and-age

No; the cars were radically different. The 29000s were the precursors of the W&LE's 27000-series single sheathed cars.   From what I remember, the USRA single sheathed cars are "similar" to the CP's

Robert Oom wrote: Call me clueless, but I can't figure out how to open the .djvu file which is the diagram. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave.,

Presubscribed publishing happens, but I can't speak to the economics. Milepost 206 is a small publisher specializing in limited press run books and calendars featuring the Chicago, Burlington, and

I don't know the economics of "on demand" printing, but I wish more would explore that option. The Santa Fe Society has begun selling "digital reprints" of our of print magazines, but that is not

Charlie Vlk wrote: That prices may reach points we don't wish to pay, and therefore are "ridiculous" to US, does not make them unreasonable in any way. Stuff is worth what someone will pay for

Were the W&LE 29000-29199 door and a half auto cars built in April, 1916 a precedent of the the single sheathed USRA cars with the exception of the doors? The diagram shows "Steel Ends Murphy's

Good for you Andy. I just sold almost a dozen for $30 each to a friend who will put them on his reference shelf and not in a vault. Jim

I have a standing order at my LHS for this. Thanks! -- Brian Ehni From: Don Burn <burn@...> Reply-To: STMFC List <STMFC@...> Date: Monday, May 13, 2013 10:17 AM To: STMFC

Charlie, The publisher still has them order direct http://rpcycpub.com/ You could suggest they modify their reprint policy at the same time. Personally, I would love to see some of the series

All- The price for books, magazines, drawings, photographs, and railroad artifacts have, in many cases, become ridiculous. There is no question that authors are entitled to their copyright

The RC carbody also is 6" too short in height, since it represents a 10'0" IH box car. The SP prewar 40ft auto box was the A-50-13. I think the A-50-16 was a postwar design, and can be modeled more

Are we collecting the magazine/books or are we modeling? Schuyler I agree. Not having the information available, and having to pay a premium price for a book because it is simply not reprinted

Tyrone, I'll claim it was a typo <G>. Yes, the eave height was 12' something, not 10' something... Regards Bruce Smith Auburn, AL

I think there is an error or I am confused regarding dimenisions in the Bruce Smith article on the FGE wood reefers. I believe the ORERS list the rail to eve height for the cars as 12-1 for the early

Rob Kirkham wrote: Most obvious problem with the model car body is door width (the Red Caboose doors are too narrow by a foot). The large block lettering of the road name was introduced in the

Was looking at possible modelling projects and came across the above described model. I see it was discussed a little bit previously back in 2003 (messages 18528, 18532, 18544), but what was said

Tom, How much are you asking for each? Ed Robinson

L&N also contributed a specially-painted boxcar to the "Friendship Train." It was L&N No. 16576, built by Mt. Vernon Car Mfg. Co. in 1947. Steve Johnson From: STMFC@...

Having seen a copy of the Mainline Modeller article, the BREX car shown is from the group 300-325 which only had the standard doors, not the express reefers 326-329 with the extra cream