|
Re: Dominion Cars
Hi Daniel,
Can't state for the preserved Dominion cars because there are
a number of them out there of which I am not aware. There are, however, a nunber of photos depicting cars with the
Hi Daniel,
Can't state for the preserved Dominion cars because there are
a number of them out there of which I am not aware. There are, however, a nunber of photos depicting cars with the
|
By
Don <riverman_vt@...>
·
#118763
·
|
|
Re: More Chicago Past links.
Brian Ehni wrote:
"I have been trying for a while for this link to come up. You may have better
results."
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/master/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34700/1a34781u.tif
Got it to come right up.
Brian Ehni wrote:
"I have been trying for a while for this link to come up. You may have better
results."
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/master/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34700/1a34781u.tif
Got it to come right up.
|
By
Benjamin Hom
·
#118760
·
|
|
Re: More Chicago Past links.
I have been trying for a while for this link to come up. You may have better
results.
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/master/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34700/1a34781u.tif
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: Ray Breyer
I have been trying for a while for this link to come up. You may have better
results.
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/master/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34700/1a34781u.tif
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: Ray Breyer
|
By
BRIAN PAUL EHNI
·
#118759
·
|
|
Re: Dominion Cars
Hi Daniel,
slow progress on the printed parts, but progress indeed!
Re the GT’s 6’ door cars, I do not have actual blue print drawings orequivalent quality measurements from surviving examples
Hi Daniel,
slow progress on the printed parts, but progress indeed!
Re the GT’s 6’ door cars, I do not have actual blue print drawings orequivalent quality measurements from surviving examples
|
By
Robert kirkham
·
#118758
·
|
|
Re: More Chicago Past links.
The LoC website is UP:
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/
(has been since Day 2 of the Teapublican Tantrum)
And these specific images are in the Illinois State University holdings
The LoC website is UP:
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/
(has been since Day 2 of the Teapublican Tantrum)
And these specific images are in the Illinois State University holdings
|
By
Ray Breyer
·
#118757
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Decals
Just send in an order, Tricia is filling all the orders she can.
Charlie Slater
To: STMFC@...
From: brianleppert@...
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:07:20 +0000
Subject: [STMFC] Sunshine Decals
Just send in an order, Tricia is filling all the orders she can.
Charlie Slater
To: STMFC@...
From: brianleppert@...
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:07:20 +0000
Subject: [STMFC] Sunshine Decals
|
By
charles slater
·
#118756
·
|
|
Re: Chicago Past Photo site
Jim,
You have a wine tank car in operation at Chicago.
Tom VanWormer
Monument CO
jcdworkingonthenp@... wrote:
Jim,
You have a wine tank car in operation at Chicago.
Tom VanWormer
Monument CO
jcdworkingonthenp@... wrote:
|
By
Tom Vanwormer
·
#118755
·
|
|
Re: More Chicago Past links.
Too bad the originals on the Library of Congress site are unavailable due to
the shutdown.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <jcdworkingonthenp@...>
Reply-To: STMFC List
Too bad the originals on the Library of Congress site are unavailable due to
the shutdown.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <jcdworkingonthenp@...>
Reply-To: STMFC List
|
By
BRIAN PAUL EHNI
·
#118754
·
|
|
More Chicago Past links.
Having a little trouble posting however hope this works.
Here is a link to trains: http://chicagopast.com/tagged/Trains There are several pages of photos here and note that the third photo down
Having a little trouble posting however hope this works.
Here is a link to trains: http://chicagopast.com/tagged/Trains There are several pages of photos here and note that the third photo down
|
By
np328
·
#118753
·
|
|
Re: Dominion Cars
---In STMFC@..., <stmfc@...> wrote:
As a random factoid: William Fowler calls his cars "cars of the Fowler type" in at least one of these patents. It's likely a marketing tool, but since these cars
---In STMFC@..., <stmfc@...> wrote:
As a random factoid: William Fowler calls his cars "cars of the Fowler type" in at least one of these patents. It's likely a marketing tool, but since these cars
|
By
destorzek@...
·
#118752
·
|
|
Sunshine Decals
And if so, what is the shipping cost?
Brian Leppert
Carson City, NV
And if so, what is the shipping cost?
Brian Leppert
Carson City, NV
|
By
brianleppert@att.net
·
#118751
·
|
|
Re: Dominion Cars
Hi guys,
As a frame of reference as to what constitutes an "actual" Fowler boxcar, I just pulled the patents. Can't really have an intelligent discussion about the topic without 'em!
Hi guys,
As a frame of reference as to what constitutes an "actual" Fowler boxcar, I just pulled the patents. Can't really have an intelligent discussion about the topic without 'em!
|
By
Ray Breyer
·
#118750
·
|
|
Re: Dominion Cars
Yeah, Clark, but the problem here is the nomenclature has never been defined. If one says a 1937 AAR boxcar, or a USRA double sheathed boxcar, the mind's eye goes directly back to the drawing
Yeah, Clark, but the problem here is the nomenclature has never been defined. If one says a 1937 AAR boxcar, or a USRA double sheathed boxcar, the mind's eye goes directly back to the drawing
|
By
destorzek@...
·
#118749
·
|
|
Re: Chicago Past Photo site
Thanks for posting that great photo
Paul Doggett UK
---In STMFC@..., <stmfc@...> wrote:
The Chicago Past Website, archival photos of Chicago that one can get lost in for hours has a photo that
Thanks for posting that great photo
Paul Doggett UK
---In STMFC@..., <stmfc@...> wrote:
The Chicago Past Website, archival photos of Chicago that one can get lost in for hours has a photo that
|
By
paul.doggett2472@...
·
#118748
·
|
|
Re: Chicago Past Photo site
Jim, that is a GATC-built 6K gal. capacity six compartment bulk wine car. Unfortunately, the reporting marks aren't visible. but it's likely to be a GATX car. There's no way to know whether it was
Jim, that is a GATC-built 6K gal. capacity six compartment bulk wine car. Unfortunately, the reporting marks aren't visible. but it's likely to be a GATX car. There's no way to know whether it was
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#118747
·
|
|
Re: Dominion Cars
Being a relative lightweight in this conversation I think some are missingthe forest and just looking at trees. To me, the purpose of these modeler coinednames is so a person can get a vision in their
Being a relative lightweight in this conversation I think some are missingthe forest and just looking at trees. To me, the purpose of these modeler coinednames is so a person can get a vision in their
|
By
Clark Propst
·
#118746
·
|
|
Re: Dominion Cars
Rob,
Given your extensive study of these cars, I have a question for you in regards to the GT's 6' version of these cars. In S scale there has been produced a 6' version in resin. These are great cars
Rob,
Given your extensive study of these cars, I have a question for you in regards to the GT's 6' version of these cars. In S scale there has been produced a 6' version in resin. These are great cars
|
By
Daniel McConnachie
·
#118745
·
|
|
Chicago Past Photo site
The Chicago Past Website, archival photos of Chicago that one can get lost in for hours has a photo that I have found rather captivating with the different cars, the switch lead layouts. This one:
The Chicago Past Website, archival photos of Chicago that one can get lost in for hours has a photo that I have found rather captivating with the different cars, the switch lead layouts. This one:
|
By
np328
·
#118744
·
|
|
Re: Dominion Cars
BTW,Does anyone know if Sunshine's decals are stillavailable,especially the "chalk marks" ? Armand Premo
BTW,Does anyone know if Sunshine's decals are stillavailable,especially the "chalk marks" ? Armand Premo
|
By
Armand Premo
·
#118743
·
|
|
Re: Dominion Cars
I think there is a problem with the debate about whether to call the carsDominion or Fowler.
I guess because of Westerfield’s extensive line of kits and Swain &Clegg’s articles in Mainline
I think there is a problem with the debate about whether to call the carsDominion or Fowler.
I guess because of Westerfield’s extensive line of kits and Swain &Clegg’s articles in Mainline
|
By
Robert kirkham
·
#118742
·
|