And I thought you were poking fun at the guys' discussion! Quoting "'A Premo' armprem2@... [STMFC]" <STMFC@...>:

 My apologies to the group.The previous emailwas intended for my Grand daughter' A. Premo

I hope you gentlemen see it more clearly than I. If your analyses are correct, I will certainly applaud the progress. Tom Baker --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast!

Tom Baker wrote: Yes, there are many thousands of unbuilt kits all over North America and for that matter, the world. But plenty of them are OTHER than resin. I have been in plenty of basements

I know we're all risking the gallows for talking about this, but since RMC is a magazine of choice for most of the RPM community because of its steady flow of quality STMFC content, I'd like to add a

Tom Baker wrote Another issue is that fewer and fewer scale modelers are building cars. I don't know if that's true or not. Some RPM'ers have never really been into actual modeling, and others

Bill, I will look to get some of this; do you mix it with thinner or just shoot straight? What pressure is best? Thank you again! Brad PS: I have had good results with Hunterline stains. I hand

I for one don't agree entirely with this. I think this list, Prototype Rail(as well as many other Prototype Railroad meets) tells a different story.Although there those are many amongst us that do buy

Tim and Dave, Well, you are certainly right about change in delivery of information media, but it does seem to me that fewer of us are out there in all scales. I know of three railroad historical

Hello, I have some new old stock Intermountain Railway factory decorated kits for the following WP PS1 40 foot 7 foot single door box cars: 40471-11 Freight car brown, black ends w/ silver lettering

I think Tim has the best take on this. There is so much information available today it is overwhelming. I find it difficult to stay up with all the information, but I'd rather havethat than what

I'm pleased to announce this morning that the new wing to the Moderate Jail, named The Demise of RMC, is now operational and has two new members [ sounds more classy than inmates ]. However, I have to

I also know several others that have had articles published in RMC & they are certainly in no hurry to pay them. It would seem to me that this would cause authors to submit their articles to some

Here is my new YouTube clip http://youtu.be/Nkd0LA_pAsA with a massive train on my layout. It is among other things many of the cars I have painted all in 1 large train! Please give it a look.

List, I am not privy to the financial dealings of RMC, however, as a past author of a number of articles in the magazine, I can attest to the fact that RMC is slow to unresponsive in paying authors.

Before embarking on the F-50-3 (which is of great interest to SPmodelers) Andrew should check with the SPH&TS which now has a manufacturingsideline that has said their plans include a Harriman flat

Tom, I thought so too, but then is it a surprise if we're expecting it? I'm confused. Maybe it's an Illinois Central box car. :-)

Tom I don't think it is demographics at all -- In the 1960's when I was a teenager, my Dad got Trains, Model Railroader and RMC. And there were a few hundred published books, with some prototype

Chuck Davis writes: "Looking through the June issue of RMC which finally arrived, there is an informative prototype article on The Great Northern' s Plywood Boxcars by Steffan Ehnbom, Scott Lupia's

I don't think it is necessarily demographics, but the rise of mobile technology. MRH has grown considerably and has a higher readership than RMC. Older demographics may not like the medium as much,