In a message dated 6/7/2015 9:15:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time,STMFC@... writes: Bill and group, If your interested in the subject and want knowmore the book(s) to look at are the ARA or AAR code

I think at this point the matter should be dropped. This post shows that the topic has fallen to the level of guessing what might have happened in a case, and if so what that might mean…… Its

jim betz wrote: Only the book is copyrighted. All authors get permission for use of any images they use, if their publishers are paying attention. The permission to publish in a book is often

Gentlemen The following data link is from the Cornell University Law School on Copyright. This should help clarify this issue on Copyright in the public domain and get use back to the discussion of

Hi everyone, It seems as though this thread has gone "off the rails" discussing what those extra tracks on the left side of the image are, rather than focusing on the FAR more interesting and

Hi, I have just(?) a couple of questions: 1) If a photo is in a book - that is copyrighted - does that copyright only apply to the book or does it also apply to the photo? Isn't it

I'm a little uncomfortable about making photocopies of photos when the seller is still active but it's hard to know who's still active and some prints don't have any information on the back. Ed

Mike Bauers wrote: Right. If you know the photographer (or relatives thereof) you may be able to find out if copyright was transferred to anyone else. But if you have no knowledge of that

Hi Schuyler, Oops! Yes, I did mean tie, not fish! That's what I get for posting late at night... But: I'm not disagreeing that the use of TIE plates was a rarity on the DL&W at this time. I was

Please clarify this for me…….. If I own the negative, I may not own the copyright and thus it can not be posted in this group? [I have some of those] Best to ya, Mike Bauers Milwaukee, Wi

I found this site to be helpful and relatively brief: The Campus Guide to Copyright Compliance The Campus Guide to Copyright Compliance New Roles, Rules and Responsibilities

Interesting…….. But you don’t tell us what is currently public domain for images. Is this link what we need to refer to? https://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm Perhaps down

Dave Nelson wrote: I will illustrate one of my prior points, and touch on Dave's comment, with the story of Will Whittaker's freight car photos, of which he took a really large number. Late in his

Two more comments: There is a yahoogroup thatr Mike setup for discussing copyright issues… IIRC it is called Licen@.... Second comment is there is a whole lot of copyfraud going on… people

Claus Schlund wrote: The broad answer is that anything copyrighted later than 1922 MAY still be in copyright if copyrights were renewed. Anything created later than 1978 IS copyrighted,

AFAIK the most conservative answer is 70 years before the current date for anything created by an individual for himself and 90 for works for hire and/or corporate creations. If you assume books are

Mike Bauers writes: "Please post at what point an image is out of copyright and available for general use?" First, I suggest you read my message of 12:04 PM where I say that I don't have time right

Mike Bauers pleaded: > Please post at what point an image is out of copyright and > available for general use? You post we must own the copyright > and there are those outside of copyright that have

Mike, Please post at what point an image is out of copyright and available for general use? You post we must own the copyright and there are those outside of copyright that have no such ownership. We

On 6/9/2015 10:24 AM, Charles Peck lnnrr152@... [STMFC] wrote: Shucks. I was going to buy the UP and rename it SP. Spen Kellogg