You realize, Steve, that this is NOT the Erie, but the DL&W. Schuyler

Doug Harding says: "I also received the photo as part of the body of the text. Interesting indeed considering the group does not allow attachments. If we can imbed photos that will change the game

Jim Betz asks an interesting question. "2) I have always thought that including a -link- to a photo that is somewhere on the web does not violate copyright laws - that it is the responsibility of the

It may also be that I could not see the photo(s) because I do not view messages as email but from the website. Bill Welch

Plus your email needs to be set to accept HTML messages, too. It eases sharing images of nice steam era freight car models. Eric Eric Hansmann El Paso, TX

---In STMFC@..., <MOFWCABOOSE@...> wrote : I might add: this question of copyright ownership did not use to be a problem. John C. La Rue, Jr. Bonita Springs, FL ================= It did not used

No, it was because Paul chose (intentionally or as the default option) HTML for his text which allows photos to be inserted in the text and apparently at the end… Jack Burgess Sent: Monday,

Al Kresse wrote: There is a form on the Library of Congress website. If you use an image without permission, you can be sued, even without copyright, though it is most unlikely anyone would do so

HOW DOES ONE COPYRIGHT INDIVIDUAL PHOTOGRAPHS? Person A sends me scan of his photo that he took years ago and then sells the original negative on eBay. Can I use it in a magazine with A's credit?

Michael Gross wrote: Correct. Financial gain has never been part of the issue. If I republish a Harry Potter book, it's theft, whether or not I resell it for "financial gain." This point is

Mike Bauers wrote: Complicated? yes. Uncertainties? yes "guessing?" Nope. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705

Before Mike shuts this discussion down, allow a few comments from someone on the other side of the table: I own a pretty large collection of negatives, from which I make prints for sale. The

So I gather you may not post another's photo even for educational purposes with no intention of financial gain? Michael Gross La Canada, CA

Tony, A small point on your explanation. When I purchased Will Whittaker's SN negatives, I specifically asked for an assignment of copyright for those negatives I was buying, which he

In a message dated 6/7/2015 9:15:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time,STMFC@... writes: Bill and group, If your interested in the subject and want knowmore the book(s) to look at are the ARA or AAR code

I think at this point the matter should be dropped. This post shows that the topic has fallen to the level of guessing what might have happened in a case, and if so what that might mean…… Its

jim betz wrote: Only the book is copyrighted. All authors get permission for use of any images they use, if their publishers are paying attention. The permission to publish in a book is often

Gentlemen The following data link is from the Cornell University Law School on Copyright. This should help clarify this issue on Copyright in the public domain and get use back to the discussion of

Hi everyone, It seems as though this thread has gone "off the rails" discussing what those extra tracks on the left side of the image are, rather than focusing on the FAR more interesting and

Hi, I have just(?) a couple of questions: 1) If a photo is in a book - that is copyrighted - does that copyright only apply to the book or does it also apply to the photo? Isn't it