|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Bill,
As specified in the ACF bill of materials for lot 3281, M-K-T 97001-97300:
Sherwin-Williams (150)/Pittsgurgh (150) Katy Standard Red - sides, ends, roof, running boards; black car cement - u/f;
Bill,
As specified in the ACF bill of materials for lot 3281, M-K-T 97001-97300:
Sherwin-Williams (150)/Pittsgurgh (150) Katy Standard Red - sides, ends, roof, running boards; black car cement - u/f;
|
By
Ed Hawkins
·
#147986
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Hello Group,
Just a quick question regarding the MKT 97001-series box cars…
When built, did these cars get painted in box car red or Sloan Yellow? Or perhaps the painting of this order was split
Hello Group,
Just a quick question regarding the MKT 97001-series box cars…
When built, did these cars get painted in box car red or Sloan Yellow? Or perhaps the painting of this order was split
|
By
Bill Keene <wakeene@...>
·
#147984
·
|
|
FGE 25339 - NPS photos
All
Up today... more from the freight car photo series on the ErieLack archive site...
part of the NPS Steamtown collection posted by Pat (Richard) McKnight;
FGE 25339 - built 1-13... photo
All
Up today... more from the freight car photo series on the ErieLack archive site...
part of the NPS Steamtown collection posted by Pat (Richard) McKnight;
FGE 25339 - built 1-13... photo
|
By
Richard Brennan
·
#147985
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
I have the original Jim Sand’s slide of MKT 97193. I can read the data on the side, BLT 1-49. It definitely has a raised panel roof, but the angle is such that I cannot tell if there is a secondary
I have the original Jim Sand’s slide of MKT 97193. I can read the data on the side, BLT 1-49. It definitely has a raised panel roof, but the angle is such that I cannot tell if there is a secondary
|
By
Douglas Harding
·
#147983
·
|
|
Re: SFRD 50 foot wood reefer question
That's it!
Thanks!
Brian Ehni
(Sent from my iPhone)
That's it!
Thanks!
Brian Ehni
(Sent from my iPhone)
|
By
BRIAN PAUL EHNI
·
#147982
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Tim,
Thank you for the education. Much appreciated.
I am also planning on attempting to model a couple of cars of this class. Do you have any suggestions for modeling the correct ends?
Cheers,
Bill
Tim,
Thank you for the education. Much appreciated.
I am also planning on attempting to model a couple of cars of this class. Do you have any suggestions for modeling the correct ends?
Cheers,
Bill
|
By
Bill Keene <wakeene@...>
·
#147981
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Or you wait for the Yarmouth series of kits . . .
Bill Welch
Or you wait for the Yarmouth series of kits . . .
Bill Welch
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#147980
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
From the ground, I think it may be hard to see the difference betweenthe
"Stanray" (SRE) rectangular panel roof and the ACF"carbuilder" roof. Both
have stamped rectangles in each panel but the ACF has
From the ground, I think it may be hard to see the difference betweenthe
"Stanray" (SRE) rectangular panel roof and the ACF"carbuilder" roof. Both
have stamped rectangles in each panel but the ACF has
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#147978
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Thank You All for answering. I now have that file and can work on a model.
Al Smith
Sonora CA
Thank You All for answering. I now have that file and can work on a model.
Al Smith
Sonora CA
|
By
Allan Smith
·
#147977
·
|
|
Re: early ORER's
Speaking only for older ORERs that I have handled, they seem to have been printed on something like old
newspaper quality paper. They were, after all, a periodical with a short shelf life. After
Speaking only for older ORERs that I have handled, they seem to have been printed on something like old
newspaper quality paper. They were, after all, a periodical with a short shelf life. After
|
By
Charles Peck
·
#147976
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Al,
I am not sure if this image will be of much help in answering your questions… but worth a shot…
http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/mkt/mkt97193ajs.jpg
To my very untrained eyeballs it appears that
Al,
I am not sure if this image will be of much help in answering your questions… but worth a shot…
http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/mkt/mkt97193ajs.jpg
To my very untrained eyeballs it appears that
|
By
Bill Keene <wakeene@...>
·
#147975
·
|
|
Re: early ORER's
Randy Hammill wrote:
Yes, archives increasingly permit photography with a phone. But if you need to flatten out the book to get the pages flat, with an older volume of the ORER, that's almost
Randy Hammill wrote:
Yes, archives increasingly permit photography with a phone. But if you need to flatten out the book to get the pages flat, with an older volume of the ORER, that's almost
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#147974
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Ed Hawkins hawk0621@... [STMFC] wrote:
Al,
I stand corrected as I just noted that under the heading "Postwar AAR" box cars are several separate lists including this one having the
Ed Hawkins hawk0621@... [STMFC] wrote:
Al,
I stand corrected as I just noted that under the heading "Postwar AAR" box cars are several separate lists including this one having the
|
By
Ed Hawkins
·
#147972
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Allan Smith smithal9@... [STMFC] wrote:
Al,
The M-K-T 97100-97300 cars in question were covered in RP CYC Volume 26 as part of my article on ACF box cars having the builder's proprietary
Allan Smith smithal9@... [STMFC] wrote:
Al,
The M-K-T 97100-97300 cars in question were covered in RP CYC Volume 26 as part of my article on ACF box cars having the builder's proprietary
|
By
Ed Hawkins
·
#147971
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Al,
Suggest you check again: http://www.steamerafreightcars.com/prototype/frtcars/2017EdHawkinsMaterial/Postwar%20ACF%20Proprietary%20Corrugated%20Ends%20(1948-1950).pdf.
Easy to miss -
Al,
Suggest you check again: http://www.steamerafreightcars.com/prototype/frtcars/2017EdHawkinsMaterial/Postwar%20ACF%20Proprietary%20Corrugated%20Ends%20(1948-1950).pdf.
Easy to miss -
|
By
David Sieber
·
#147970
·
|
|
Re: early ORER's
If you could physically read them, could you take a picture with your phone? No risk of damaging the books that way.
Randy
--
Randy Hammill
Modeling the New Haven Railroad 1946-1954 |
If you could physically read them, could you take a picture with your phone? No risk of damaging the books that way.
Randy
--
Randy Hammill
Modeling the New Haven Railroad 1946-1954 |
|
By
rhammill
·
#147969
·
|
|
Re: MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
Al
I don't know the exact details, but they're very likely listed
in one of Ed's new spreadsheets. There is a photo of 97190 in
Morning Sun's "IC In Color" (p.70) that clearly showscarbuilder
4/4 ends
Al
I don't know the exact details, but they're very likely listed
in one of Ed's new spreadsheets. There is a photo of 97190 in
Morning Sun's "IC In Color" (p.70) that clearly showscarbuilder
4/4 ends
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#147968
·
|
|
Re: SFRD 50 foot wood reefer question
> I don’t see one on the north side, but there is one the south side, next to the tracks. Near the intersection of West Broadway (I-20 Business) and Poplar.
This may help to narrow it
> I don’t see one on the north side, but there is one the south side, next to the tracks. Near the intersection of West Broadway (I-20 Business) and Poplar.
This may help to narrow it
|
By
Justin May
·
#147979
·
|
|
Re: Atlas/Branchline sale
I give up.Armand Premo
By
Armand Premo
·
#147973
·
|
|
MKT 97001-97300 Boxcars
I have conductors lists from the Sierra RR in 1952-1954. One car on the list is MKT 97165. I have a photo from an article in Modelrailroading of car 97095. The photo is a broadside shot and does't
I have conductors lists from the Sierra RR in 1952-1954. One car on the list is MKT 97165. I have a photo from an article in Modelrailroading of car 97095. The photo is a broadside shot and does't
|
By
Allan Smith
·
#147967
·
|