|
Re: URTX 67806 (Meat Reefer)
Dennis those all appear to be significantly different looking rebuildsthan
this car - and I could be wrong but they all appear to be 36 foot cars!(I know
the web site says they are 40 feet long but
Dennis those all appear to be significantly different looking rebuildsthan
this car - and I could be wrong but they all appear to be 36 foot cars!(I know
the web site says they are 40 feet long but
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#149061
·
|
|
Re: Mystery car
Yep. I took many photos of a nearly identical ex-NYC car sitting inthe
"relic collection" in Utica, New York ~14-15 yearsago.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/timboconnor/34089410612/
Tim O'Connor
Yep. I took many photos of a nearly identical ex-NYC car sitting inthe
"relic collection" in Utica, New York ~14-15 yearsago.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/timboconnor/34089410612/
Tim O'Connor
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#149060
·
|
|
Re: URTX 67806 (Meat Reefer)
---In STMFC@..., <rwitt_2000@...> wrote :
I looked in the photos I have for a similar URTX reefers and cannot find any. Reefer similar to this one were probably built new in the 1950s with 3-3 dart
---In STMFC@..., <rwitt_2000@...> wrote :
I looked in the photos I have for a similar URTX reefers and cannot find any. Reefer similar to this one were probably built new in the 1950s with 3-3 dart
|
By
destorzek@...
·
#149059
·
|
|
Re: What Class Boxcar Was This UP Caboose Converted From?
Jeff,
You forgot about the high prices that the life guard union was charging in those days.
Allen
Jeff,
You forgot about the high prices that the life guard union was charging in those days.
Allen
|
By
Allen Montgomery
·
#149058
·
|
|
Re: What Class Boxcar Was This UP Caboose Converted From?
Jack,
You wrote, “I kinda figured that the reason for this conversion was that with the beginning of pool cabooses, the large auto car body was needed to provide room for the
Jack,
You wrote, “I kinda figured that the reason for this conversion was that with the beginning of pool cabooses, the large auto car body was needed to provide room for the
|
By
Aley, Jeff A
·
#149057
·
|
|
Re: URTX 67806 (Meat Reefer)
I looked in the photos I have for a similar URTX reefers and cannot find any. Reefer similar to this one were probably built new in the 1950s with 3-3 dart naught ends and horizontal side seams and
I looked in the photos I have for a similar URTX reefers and cannot find any. Reefer similar to this one were probably built new in the 1950s with 3-3 dart naught ends and horizontal side seams and
|
By
rwitt_2000
·
#149056
·
|
|
Re: Mystery car
Mike,
Ya know, it’s helpful to post an image or a link… and the funning thing is, GOOGLE found it right away:
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/419/19787279323_941656a809_b.jpg
That looks like a GSC
Mike,
Ya know, it’s helpful to post an image or a link… and the funning thing is, GOOGLE found it right away:
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/419/19787279323_941656a809_b.jpg
That looks like a GSC
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#149055
·
|
|
Weathering box carsr
A couple of model progress photos has turned into a blog post. Craig Zeni offers an update on a couple of weathered box car models. Check out his techniques in the latest Resin Car Works blog
A couple of model progress photos has turned into a blog post. Craig Zeni offers an update on a couple of weathered box car models. Check out his techniques in the latest Resin Car Works blog
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#149052
·
|
|
Re: Terry Wegmann PFE Kit Parts
Also take care not to use the IM/RC R-30-12-9 (or the WP car) because it's the short version compared to the IM/RC R-30-9 body, which is the >1939 tall version. Difference between both models is 3mm.
Also take care not to use the IM/RC R-30-12-9 (or the WP car) because it's the short version compared to the IM/RC R-30-9 body, which is the >1939 tall version. Difference between both models is 3mm.
|
By
Fred Jansz
·
#149051
·
|
|
Re: Early ATSF Mechanical Reefer Models - What Do You Want?
I too would fudge and use a couple of R-54s as the rest are beyond my modeling period.
Jim
--------------------------------------------
I too would fudge and use a couple of R-54s as the rest are beyond my modeling period.
Jim
--------------------------------------------
|
By
James Babcock
·
#149053
·
|
|
Hooker paint scheme. Re: the Broadway Limited tanks
Brian Carlson
By
Brian Carlson
·
#149050
·
|
|
Re: Terry Wegmann PFE Kit Parts
Why not try combining an InterMountain PFE 40-10 roof w/the Tichy sides and ends?
Bill Welch
Why not try combining an InterMountain PFE 40-10 roof w/the Tichy sides and ends?
Bill Welch
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#149049
·
|
|
Mystery car
Can someone look up the original RR that owned the about 36-foot cast drop bottom flatcar that spent its last years as HCMX-4403 in the Harnischfeger Milwaukee plant??
It was scrapped a few years ago
Can someone look up the original RR that owned the about 36-foot cast drop bottom flatcar that spent its last years as HCMX-4403 in the Harnischfeger Milwaukee plant??
It was scrapped a few years ago
|
By
mwbauers
·
#149054
·
|
|
Re: the Broadway Limited tanks
Folks,
I wondered if anyone was planning in replacing the trucks on the BLI 6K tank cars. That seems to me to be the weakest part of these cars... and I'm wondering what to swap in place of the BLI
Folks,
I wondered if anyone was planning in replacing the trucks on the BLI 6K tank cars. That seems to me to be the weakest part of these cars... and I'm wondering what to swap in place of the BLI
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#149048
·
|
|
Re: Early ATSF Mechanical Reefer Models - What Do You Want?
> I model the early 1960s. The other class that attracts myattention is Rr-69 with 500 built in 1961.
> Posted by: "Gary Green"
Obviously the Rr-69 is post-STMFC. Nevertheless, a manufacturer
> I model the early 1960s. The other class that attracts myattention is Rr-69 with 500 built in 1961.
> Posted by: "Gary Green"
Obviously the Rr-69 is post-STMFC. Nevertheless, a manufacturer
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#149046
·
|
|
Re: the Broadway Limited tanks
Andy,
We have been selling singles since they arrived.
Merlyn Lauber
Caboose Stop Hobbies
Cedar Falls, Iowa
Andy,
We have been selling singles since they arrived.
Merlyn Lauber
Caboose Stop Hobbies
Cedar Falls, Iowa
|
By
Merlyn Lauber
·
#149047
·
|
|
Re: Early ATSF Mechanical Reefer Models - What Do You Want?
> If you were to proposethat a manufacturer invest in the tooling and production of a firstgeneration
> Santa Fe mechanical refrigerator car, which classwould you suggest?
Bob my suggestion would
> If you were to proposethat a manufacturer invest in the tooling and production of a firstgeneration
> Santa Fe mechanical refrigerator car, which classwould you suggest?
Bob my suggestion would
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#149045
·
|
|
Re: Early ATSF Mechanical Reefer Models - What Do You Want?
I would fudge and use some RR-54, but everything else is just too late for my modeling.
Steve Sandifer
I would fudge and use some RR-54, but everything else is just too late for my modeling.
Steve Sandifer
|
By
Steve SANDIFER
·
#149044
·
|
|
Re: Early ATSF Mechanical Reefer Models - What Do You Want?
---In STMFC@..., <gary@...> wrote :
Bob,
The Rr-56 would be a very desirable model with a significant number built in the later 1950s.
I model the early 1960s. The other class that attracts my
---In STMFC@..., <gary@...> wrote :
Bob,
The Rr-56 would be a very desirable model with a significant number built in the later 1950s.
I model the early 1960s. The other class that attracts my
|
By
thecitrusbelt@...
·
#149043
·
|
|
Re: the Broadway Limited tanks
Tony
lol - YMMV.
In any case, it's the order that matters, not the magnitude. :-)
Tim
Tony
lol - YMMV.
In any case, it's the order that matters, not the magnitude. :-)
Tim
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#149042
·
|