|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
This caboose had high speed trucks? Would that allow for higher mixed-train speeds?
Al kresse
This caboose had high speed trucks? Would that allow for higher mixed-train speeds?
Al kresse
|
By
al.kresse <water.kresse@...>
·
#156612
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
The CB&Q had a limited number of side door cabooses ( waycars) but one of the
side door cars was assigned to Fort Madison for many decades for branch line service.
Ed Rethwisch,
The CB&Q had a limited number of side door cabooses ( waycars) but one of the
side door cars was assigned to Fort Madison for many decades for branch line service.
Ed Rethwisch,
|
By
Ed Rethwisch
·
#156611
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
Considering I can find no Iowa statute that specifically mentions side doors, I'm beginning to think the "ban" was self imposed by the IC, either in response to union pressure or because they had to
Considering I can find no Iowa statute that specifically mentions side doors, I'm beginning to think the "ban" was self imposed by the IC, either in response to union pressure or because they had to
|
By
Dennis Storzek
·
#156610
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
I believe the Side Door Ban on the IC cabooses in Iowa was an old Union rule which was due to a safety concern that a crew member could fall out of the open door. I think this was changed in the
I believe the Side Door Ban on the IC cabooses in Iowa was an old Union rule which was due to a safety concern that a crew member could fall out of the open door. I think this was changed in the
|
By
Merlyn Lauber
·
#156609
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
The IC did run side door cabooses in Iowa. But I understand, when they did use them in Iowa, the side doors were required to be bolted or welded shut so they could not be opened. The IC cabooses had
The IC did run side door cabooses in Iowa. But I understand, when they did use them in Iowa, the side doors were required to be bolted or welded shut so they could not be opened. The IC cabooses had
|
By
Douglas Harding
·
#156608
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
By
Walter
·
#156607
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
Did they want to force separate drover cars for the farmers? Were there more bunk spaces?
Al Kresse
Did they want to force separate drover cars for the farmers? Were there more bunk spaces?
Al Kresse
|
By
al.kresse <water.kresse@...>
·
#156606
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
This doesn't explain why the IC built different cabooses to operate in Iowa. I'm not an attorney but in my career as a police officer I read and interpreted statutes all the time and by my
This doesn't explain why the IC built different cabooses to operate in Iowa. I'm not an attorney but in my career as a police officer I read and interpreted statutes all the time and by my
|
By
Jeffrey White
·
#156605
·
|
|
Re: Canadian National Eight-Hatch Reefers
Hi Bob
Unfortunately your question does not have a concise answer.
CN purchased 3,185 of the steel 8-hatch reefers in 14 batches from 1940 to 1958.
There were many visual differences so to get an
Hi Bob
Unfortunately your question does not have a concise answer.
CN purchased 3,185 of the steel 8-hatch reefers in 14 batches from 1940 to 1958.
There were many visual differences so to get an
|
By
John Riddell
·
#156604
·
|
|
Re: Branchline /atlas parts
Dave,
I have one #1700 undecorated "standard style" 50' PD car. Contact me off-list if you want this: sarahsan_AT_embarqmail.com.
Yours Aye,
Garth
Dave,
I have one #1700 undecorated "standard style" 50' PD car. Contact me off-list if you want this: sarahsan_AT_embarqmail.com.
Yours Aye,
Garth
|
By
Garth Groff <sarahsan@...>
·
#156603
·
|
|
Re: Branchline /atlas parts
Thanks folks for all the info on branchline kits. I was looking for a couple undec standard 50ft plug dr cars not GARX versions. I think BL made two different types?, for a kit bash starting point.
Thanks folks for all the info on branchline kits. I was looking for a couple undec standard 50ft plug dr cars not GARX versions. I think BL made two different types?, for a kit bash starting point.
|
By
Dave Boss
·
#156602
·
|
|
Re: Canadian National Eight-Hatch Reefers
The Funaro & Camerlengo kit of the CN type built into a very satisfying model although I am not sure if mine may have been issued as an RPI kit. It had Dreadnaught ends.
Bill Welch
The Funaro & Camerlengo kit of the CN type built into a very satisfying model although I am not sure if mine may have been issued as an RPI kit. It had Dreadnaught ends.
Bill Welch
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#156601
·
|
|
Re: Branchline /atlas parts
I notice the site has cut the information after the "@" so here it is: atlasrr.com
Bill Welch
I notice the site has cut the information after the "@" so here it is: atlasrr.com
Bill Welch
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#156600
·
|
|
Re: Branchline /atlas parts
Brian, to the extent this will help you here is the email address for the person at Alas I have found to be helpful: Steve Millenbach—smillenbach@.... I think his role is Customer Relations and he
Brian, to the extent this will help you here is the email address for the person at Alas I have found to be helpful: Steve Millenbach—smillenbach@.... I think his role is Customer Relations and he
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#156599
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
The 1911 law must have been amended or annulled at some point, because the converted boxcars had neither end platform or cupola, and they operated in Iowa based upon photographic evidence. This thread
The 1911 law must have been amended or annulled at some point, because the converted boxcars had neither end platform or cupola, and they operated in Iowa based upon photographic evidence. This thread
|
By
Nelson Moyer
·
#156598
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
But they did require end platforms. This link should take you to the announcement of the 1911 law:
Caboose Cars
I was also interested to learn that Lorenzo S. Coffin, the railroad safety crusader from
But they did require end platforms. This link should take you to the announcement of the 1911 law:
Caboose Cars
I was also interested to learn that Lorenzo S. Coffin, the railroad safety crusader from
|
By
Dennis Storzek
·
#156597
·
|
|
Re: Canadian National Eight-Hatch Reefers
True Line Trains did *both* CN and CP versions, and their 'Web site discusses the physical differences.
Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
True Line Trains did *both* CN and CP versions, and their 'Web site discusses the physical differences.
Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
|
By
al_brown03
·
#156596
·
|
|
Re: Canadian National Eight-Hatch Reefers
Go to their website: http://www.truelinetrains.ca/freight-cars/ho---8-hatch-reefer
Richard Townsend
Lincoln City, OR
Go to their website: http://www.truelinetrains.ca/freight-cars/ho---8-hatch-reefer
Richard Townsend
Lincoln City, OR
|
By
Richard Townsend
·
#156595
·
|
|
Re: Canadian National Eight-Hatch Reefers
I have no idea
Pierre Oliverwww.elgincarshops.comwww.yarmouthmodelworks.com
On 5/23/18 2:11 PM, Armand Premo wrote:
I have no idea
Pierre Oliverwww.elgincarshops.comwww.yarmouthmodelworks.com
On 5/23/18 2:11 PM, Armand Premo wrote:
|
By
Pierre Oliver
·
#156594
·
|
|
Re: Canadian National Eight-Hatch Reefers
Which one did True Line trains do ?Armand Premo
Which one did True Line trains do ?Armand Premo
|
By
Armand Premo
·
#156593
·
|