|
Re: RPM Freight Car Presentation Hardware Question
Bill Keene wrote:
I agree, Bill, and there is no necessity to make the PDF conversion. If one likes Keynote better than Powerpoint, one can always create the talk in Keynote and save a version as
Bill Keene wrote:
I agree, Bill, and there is no necessity to make the PDF conversion. If one likes Keynote better than Powerpoint, one can always create the talk in Keynote and save a version as
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#156622
·
|
|
Re: RPM Freight Car Presentation Hardware Question
Bill,
I am somewhat surprised that you convert your presentations to PDF and not present using the Keynote software. I am curious about your reasons for this as it appears to me that you are loosing
Bill,
I am somewhat surprised that you convert your presentations to PDF and not present using the Keynote software. I am curious about your reasons for this as it appears to me that you are loosing
|
By
Bill Keene
·
#156621
·
|
|
Re: MILW SS Box Car 713406
Nice looking model, Lester, and a sensible approach to the stand-in issue with the ends. As I conduct more and more operating sessions on my layout, where car ends are frequently not very visible, my
Nice looking model, Lester, and a sensible approach to the stand-in issue with the ends. As I conduct more and more operating sessions on my layout, where car ends are frequently not very visible, my
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#156620
·
|
|
Re: RPM Freight Car Presentation Hardware Question
That is my fear Tony. I would like to get by the least expensive way but realize iPad may not work for what I want to do. The repair person I use here for my Apples has second hand machines
That is my fear Tony. I would like to get by the least expensive way but realize iPad may not work for what I want to do. The repair person I use here for my Apples has second hand machines
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#156619
·
|
|
MILW SS Box Car 713406
I have MILWAUKEE SS Box Car, 713406, an upgraded Accurail kit built, in paint and weathered. I have posted photos and writeup including changes from kit, paint, etc. on my blog I started to share
I have MILWAUKEE SS Box Car, 713406, an upgraded Accurail kit built, in paint and weathered. I have posted photos and writeup including changes from kit, paint, etc. on my blog I started to share
|
By
Lester Breuer
·
#156618
·
|
|
Re: RPM Freight Car Presentation Hardware Question
Bill Welch wrote:
A couple of years ago I tried to use my iPad for giving talks, and as Bill mentions, the connection to projectors is quite variable. Sometimes I also could not get the iPad to
Bill Welch wrote:
A couple of years ago I tried to use my iPad for giving talks, and as Bill mentions, the connection to projectors is quite variable. Sometimes I also could not get the iPad to
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#156617
·
|
|
Re: RPM Freight Car Presentation Hardware Question
With C&OHS most presentations are made with the hotel's projectors. Therefore we put all PPT's on one "nerds" PC the day before and dry-run the PPT's with the projector. We have folks still working
With C&OHS most presentations are made with the hotel's projectors. Therefore we put all PPT's on one "nerds" PC the day before and dry-run the PPT's with the projector. We have folks still working
|
By
al.kresse <water.kresse@...>
·
#156616
·
|
|
RPM Freight Car Presentation Hardware Question
I am hoping there may be people here that have experience using Apple’s iPad that will comment on the questions I have.
The Apple Laptop I have used for years for my annual RPM Freight Car
I am hoping there may be people here that have experience using Apple’s iPad that will comment on the questions I have.
The Apple Laptop I have used for years for my annual RPM Freight Car
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#156615
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
Al, the Q waycar trucks in Ed’s photos are the standard Q waycar trucks. I think I remember they were classed #7 by the Q. They had an oak plank at the top, and they had solid bearings. Crews liked
Al, the Q waycar trucks in Ed’s photos are the standard Q waycar trucks. I think I remember they were classed #7 by the Q. They had an oak plank at the top, and they had solid bearings. Crews liked
|
By
Nelson Moyer
·
#156614
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
Al most CBQ wood cabooses road on wood beam trucks, that looked very similar to passenger car trucks. Some were later fitted with Allied trucks. The later steel cabooses road on more traditional cast
Al most CBQ wood cabooses road on wood beam trucks, that looked very similar to passenger car trucks. Some were later fitted with Allied trucks. The later steel cabooses road on more traditional cast
|
By
Douglas Harding
·
#156613
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
This caboose had high speed trucks? Would that allow for higher mixed-train speeds?
Al kresse
This caboose had high speed trucks? Would that allow for higher mixed-train speeds?
Al kresse
|
By
al.kresse <water.kresse@...>
·
#156612
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
The CB&Q had a limited number of side door cabooses ( waycars) but one of the
side door cars was assigned to Fort Madison for many decades for branch line service.
Ed Rethwisch,
The CB&Q had a limited number of side door cabooses ( waycars) but one of the
side door cars was assigned to Fort Madison for many decades for branch line service.
Ed Rethwisch,
|
By
Ed Rethwisch
·
#156611
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
Considering I can find no Iowa statute that specifically mentions side doors, I'm beginning to think the "ban" was self imposed by the IC, either in response to union pressure or because they had to
Considering I can find no Iowa statute that specifically mentions side doors, I'm beginning to think the "ban" was self imposed by the IC, either in response to union pressure or because they had to
|
By
Dennis Storzek
·
#156610
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
I believe the Side Door Ban on the IC cabooses in Iowa was an old Union rule which was due to a safety concern that a crew member could fall out of the open door. I think this was changed in the
I believe the Side Door Ban on the IC cabooses in Iowa was an old Union rule which was due to a safety concern that a crew member could fall out of the open door. I think this was changed in the
|
By
Merlyn Lauber
·
#156609
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
The IC did run side door cabooses in Iowa. But I understand, when they did use them in Iowa, the side doors were required to be bolted or welded shut so they could not be opened. The IC cabooses had
The IC did run side door cabooses in Iowa. But I understand, when they did use them in Iowa, the side doors were required to be bolted or welded shut so they could not be opened. The IC cabooses had
|
By
Douglas Harding
·
#156608
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
By
Walter
·
#156607
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
Did they want to force separate drover cars for the farmers? Were there more bunk spaces?
Al Kresse
Did they want to force separate drover cars for the farmers? Were there more bunk spaces?
Al Kresse
|
By
al.kresse <water.kresse@...>
·
#156606
·
|
|
Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
This doesn't explain why the IC built different cabooses to operate in Iowa. I'm not an attorney but in my career as a police officer I read and interpreted statutes all the time and by my
This doesn't explain why the IC built different cabooses to operate in Iowa. I'm not an attorney but in my career as a police officer I read and interpreted statutes all the time and by my
|
By
Jeffrey White
·
#156605
·
|
|
Re: Canadian National Eight-Hatch Reefers
Hi Bob
Unfortunately your question does not have a concise answer.
CN purchased 3,185 of the steel 8-hatch reefers in 14 batches from 1940 to 1958.
There were many visual differences so to get an
Hi Bob
Unfortunately your question does not have a concise answer.
CN purchased 3,185 of the steel 8-hatch reefers in 14 batches from 1940 to 1958.
There were many visual differences so to get an
|
By
John Riddell
·
#156604
·
|
|
Re: Branchline /atlas parts
Dave,
I have one #1700 undecorated "standard style" 50' PD car. Contact me off-list if you want this: sarahsan_AT_embarqmail.com.
Yours Aye,
Garth
Dave,
I have one #1700 undecorated "standard style" 50' PD car. Contact me off-list if you want this: sarahsan_AT_embarqmail.com.
Yours Aye,
Garth
|
By
Garth Groff <sarahsan@...>
·
#156603
·
|