|
Re: 40' 1 1/2 door SS boxcars
Hi Don,
I know of one article that's about to go to press, and I'm about to start on another (using your part on double sheathed cars).
Ray Breyer
Elgin, IL
Hi Don,
I know of one article that's about to go to press, and I'm about to start on another (using your part on double sheathed cars).
Ray Breyer
Elgin, IL
|
By
Ray Breyer
·
#167282
·
|
|
Re: Model Help
The Sunshine hoppers wouldn't work [I can't quickly find the Inside Length.]?
twin bay chiseled side hoppers (Discontinued)
Both series of cars were built by Pressed Steel Car so they could
The Sunshine hoppers wouldn't work [I can't quickly find the Inside Length.]?
twin bay chiseled side hoppers (Discontinued)
Both series of cars were built by Pressed Steel Car so they could
|
By
rwitt_2000
·
#167283
·
|
|
Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
Can anyone of you review the prototype fidelity of subj. cars, especially the Linde
and GN car? I would like to avoid buying foobies!
Ben de Vries, the Netherlands
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Can anyone of you review the prototype fidelity of subj. cars, especially the Linde
and GN car? I would like to avoid buying foobies!
Ben de Vries, the Netherlands
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
|
By
Ben de Vries
·
#167284
·
|
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
Ben,
I can't comment on the fidelity of the body styles since I don't have any of the Bowser cars, and their web pictures are rather unhelpful.
As for the Linde
Ben,
I can't comment on the fidelity of the body styles since I don't have any of the Bowser cars, and their web pictures are rather unhelpful.
As for the Linde
|
By
Garth Groff <sarahsan@...>
·
#167285
·
|
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
Thank you Garth for your very informative message!
Ben
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 10 okt. 2019 om 11:08 heeft Garth Groff <sarahsan@...> het volgende geschreven:
Thank you Garth for your very informative message!
Ben
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 10 okt. 2019 om 11:08 heeft Garth Groff <sarahsan@...> het volgende geschreven:
|
By
Ben de Vries
·
#167286
·
|
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
A link would be helpful Ben. . .
Bill Welch
A link would be helpful Ben. . .
Bill Welch
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#167287
·
|
|
Re: Erie coal gon
Steve:
Sorry, I don't recall which RMC issue had the Erie coal gon article. My quick attempt at trying to find an index on-line was not successful.
IIRC, the article wasn't much help regarding the
Steve:
Sorry, I don't recall which RMC issue had the Erie coal gon article. My quick attempt at trying to find an index on-line was not successful.
IIRC, the article wasn't much help regarding the
|
By
Alice Devenny
·
#167288
·
|
|
Re: Erie coal gon
...but it was done in brass in TT-scale!!! A 'Joma'import from Japan.
Drawings from the '31 CBCyc were reprinted in Train Shed Cyclopedia46...
and an article by Jim Cassidy on upgrading the Mantua
...but it was done in brass in TT-scale!!! A 'Joma'import from Japan.
Drawings from the '31 CBCyc were reprinted in Train Shed Cyclopedia46...
and an article by Jim Cassidy on upgrading the Mantua
|
By
Richard Brennan
·
#167289
·
|
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
Ben de Vries asked:
"Can anyone of you review the prototype fidelity of subj. cars, especially the Linde and GN car? I would like to avoid buying foobies!"
Bill Welch replied:
"A link would be helpful
Ben de Vries asked:
"Can anyone of you review the prototype fidelity of subj. cars, especially the Linde and GN car? I would like to avoid buying foobies!"
Bill Welch replied:
"A link would be helpful
|
By
Benjamin Hom
·
#167290
·
|
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
As tank cars, I assume there would not have been a reweigh requirement for these cars and the model should not have reweigh stenciling, right?
Bob Chaparro
Hemet, CA
As tank cars, I assume there would not have been a reweigh requirement for these cars and the model should not have reweigh stenciling, right?
Bob Chaparro
Hemet, CA
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#167291
·
|
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
Some did.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of "Bob Chaparro via Groups.Io" <chiefbobbb@...>
Reply-To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Date: Thursday, October
Some did.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of "Bob Chaparro via Groups.Io" <chiefbobbb@...>
Reply-To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Date: Thursday, October
|
By
BRIAN PAUL EHNI
·
#167292
·
|
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
.....but they did. See attached.
Elden Gatwood
.....but they did. See attached.
Elden Gatwood
|
By
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
·
#167293
·
|
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
OK, I’m a little confused by this conversation.
FIRST - afaik, ALL cars in interchange service were required to show CAPY, LD LMT, and LT WT data and the LT WT data was to be accompanied by either
OK, I’m a little confused by this conversation.
FIRST - afaik, ALL cars in interchange service were required to show CAPY, LD LMT, and LT WT data and the LT WT data was to be accompanied by either
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#167294
·
|
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
At least through the 1920a and 30s, the MCB/ARA lettering standards did not require a LD LMT stencil on tank cars, only the LT WT and CAPY stencils. I have seen a LD LMT on a few tank cars, but it
At least through the 1920a and 30s, the MCB/ARA lettering standards did not require a LD LMT stencil on tank cars, only the LT WT and CAPY stencils. I have seen a LD LMT on a few tank cars, but it
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#167295
·
|
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
The GN car: Foobie! Nothing seems right but wheels and couplers. Accurail came closer 30 years ago except a fish belly side sill needing straightening and an overhanging diagonal panel roof to be
The GN car: Foobie! Nothing seems right but wheels and couplers. Accurail came closer 30 years ago except a fish belly side sill needing straightening and an overhanging diagonal panel roof to be
|
By
Staffan Ehnbom
·
#167296
·
|
|
Swift Reefers
Has anyone published any sort of detailed roster of Swift reefers? I seem to think so, but can't locate such. I do have Martin Lofton's RMJ 2-93 article.
Maybe a good clinic session?
Thanks in
Has anyone published any sort of detailed roster of Swift reefers? I seem to think so, but can't locate such. I do have Martin Lofton's RMJ 2-93 article.
Maybe a good clinic session?
Thanks in
|
By
Steve and Barb Hile
·
#167297
·
|
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
As I read Bob's conjecture, he's not saying that tank cars wouldn't have weight data, just that they "shouldn't" have REweigh dates and revised weights. Not completely false, but an overstatement.
I
As I read Bob's conjecture, he's not saying that tank cars wouldn't have weight data, just that they "shouldn't" have REweigh dates and revised weights. Not completely false, but an overstatement.
I
|
By
Jack Mullen
·
#167298
·
|
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
ALL tank cars, including Linde Tank Cars, would have weight data and most would have reweigh data.
Nope. Plenty of tank cars had their NEW weight decades after being built. I don’t agree that even
ALL tank cars, including Linde Tank Cars, would have weight data and most would have reweigh data.
Nope. Plenty of tank cars had their NEW weight decades after being built. I don’t agree that even
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#167299
·
|
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
Ben,
thank you, I know now that I should avoid these models!
Ben
Ben,
thank you, I know now that I should avoid these models!
Ben
|
By
Ben de Vries
·
#167300
·
|
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
Thank you Staffan, that saves me money!
Ben
Thank you Staffan, that saves me money!
Ben
|
By
Ben de Vries
·
#167301
·
|