|
Photo: Erie Low Side Hopper (Gondola?) With Damaged Floor
Photo: Erie Low Side Hopper (Gondola?) With Damaged Floor
An undated photo from the Columbus Metropolitan
Photo: Erie Low Side Hopper (Gondola?) With Damaged Floor
An undated photo from the Columbus Metropolitan
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#173333
·
|
|
Re: Accurail DL&W 40 Foot DD Box Car
Ken Adams wrote:
"Accurail has announced this. As I am a sucker for double door 40 foot box cars and know little about what is accurate for eastern railroads, I am
Ken Adams wrote:
"Accurail has announced this. As I am a sucker for double door 40 foot box cars and know little about what is accurate for eastern railroads, I am
|
By
Benjamin Hom
·
#173332
·
|
|
Re: Accurail DL&W 40 Foot DD Box Car
Ken -
My January 1952 ORER shows DL&W series 11300-11599 as 40'-7" IL double door boxcars with 12'-6" wide door openings, AAR mech designation XMR (auto racks installed). This is the same number
Ken -
My January 1952 ORER shows DL&W series 11300-11599 as 40'-7" IL double door boxcars with 12'-6" wide door openings, AAR mech designation XMR (auto racks installed). This is the same number
|
By
Todd Sullivan
·
#173331
·
|
|
Re: Accurail DL&W 40 Foot DD Box Car
I, too, am disappointed to report that this car number is not listed in my April 1950 ORER. Accurail did pick a number in a non-existent series of cars. As you note, the car looks fairly modern and
I, too, am disappointed to report that this car number is not listed in my April 1950 ORER. Accurail did pick a number in a non-existent series of cars. As you note, the car looks fairly modern and
|
By
Schuyler Larrabee
·
#173330
·
|
|
Re: Wanted Data sheet and assembly instructions for Sunshine Kit #2.1 C&NW rebuilt boxcar
Here you are.
Jim
By
Jim Hayes
·
#173329
·
|
|
Accurail DL&W 40 Foot DD Box Car
Accurail has announced this. As I am a sucker for double door 40 foot box cars and know little about what is accurate for eastern railroads, I am asking if this is too much a foobie or incorrect
Accurail has announced this. As I am a sucker for double door 40 foot box cars and know little about what is accurate for eastern railroads, I am asking if this is too much a foobie or incorrect
|
By
Ken Adams
·
#173328
·
|
|
Wanted Data sheet and assembly instructions for Sunshine Kit #2.1 C&NW rebuilt boxcar
Group,
I purchased a kit without a data sheet or instructions. The Sunshine Models kit #2.1 is for a C&NW 65000 series, steel side rebuild USRA DS boxcar. Does anyone have this information who is
Group,
I purchased a kit without a data sheet or instructions. The Sunshine Models kit #2.1 is for a C&NW 65000 series, steel side rebuild USRA DS boxcar. Does anyone have this information who is
|
By
Chuck Cover
·
#173327
·
|
|
Re: Ownership Of Tank Cars In 1950
Fred, the attached entry from the 1955 Tank Car Capacities tariff clearly shows 215 cars in the WP listing.
Ian CranstoneOsgoode, Ontario, Canada
lamontc@...
http://freightcars.nakina.net
Fred, the attached entry from the 1955 Tank Car Capacities tariff clearly shows 215 cars in the WP listing.
Ian CranstoneOsgoode, Ontario, Canada
lamontc@...
http://freightcars.nakina.net
|
By
Ian Cranstone
·
#173326
·
|
|
Re: need help finding a photo
Schuyler,
They look like 1959 Cadillac's which would date the photo late 1958 or the first half of 1959.
Mont Switzer
Schuyler,
They look like 1959 Cadillac's which would date the photo late 1958 or the first half of 1959.
Mont Switzer
|
By
Mont Switzer
·
#173325
·
|
|
Re: EARLY PLASTIC KITS
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 02:09 PM, WILLIAM PARDIE wrote:
That was the first and last time that I took a model to an event.Do you mean because of the damage is transit? Or, because of the negative
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 02:09 PM, WILLIAM PARDIE wrote:
That was the first and last time that I took a model to an event.Do you mean because of the damage is transit? Or, because of the negative
|
By
Clark Propst
·
#173324
·
|
|
Re: WP and SP&S 1944 AAR Boxcars -- C&BT Upgrades #4 & #5
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:48 AM, Bob Chapman wrote:
The technique was developed by the late Greg Martin
I thought so. I've used it too on PS1 cars just like in the article Greg did using a ATSF
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:48 AM, Bob Chapman wrote:
The technique was developed by the late Greg Martin
I thought so. I've used it too on PS1 cars just like in the article Greg did using a ATSF
|
By
Clark Propst
·
#173323
·
|
|
Re: need help finding a photo
I'm not sure what the notches in the sides of the converted gondola were for, but they were not for releasing the fifth pin from the car mounted hitch. The fifth pin would have been released by a man
I'm not sure what the notches in the sides of the converted gondola were for, but they were not for releasing the fifth pin from the car mounted hitch. The fifth pin would have been released by a man
|
By
Mont Switzer
·
#173322
·
|
|
Re: Ownership Of Tank Cars In 1950
Fred and friends,
Interesting observation. This gives us a one-year window for when WP tank cars were reclassified to MW service. It would be interesting to figure out approximately when the change
Fred and friends,
Interesting observation. This gives us a one-year window for when WP tank cars were reclassified to MW service. It would be interesting to figure out approximately when the change
|
By
Garth Groff and Sally Sanford <mallardlodge1000@...>
·
#173321
·
|
|
Re: Ownership Of Tank Cars In 1950
Guys,
WP purchased 210 tank cars in 1912 (60,10k cap)), 1913 (100, 10k cap)) and 1929 (50, 12,5k cap)).
After WW II, most of these were used in bilge water, diesel fuel, water, sand and other company
Guys,
WP purchased 210 tank cars in 1912 (60,10k cap)), 1913 (100, 10k cap)) and 1929 (50, 12,5k cap)).
After WW II, most of these were used in bilge water, diesel fuel, water, sand and other company
|
By
Fred Jansz
·
#173320
·
|
|
Re: need help finding a photo
It was to reach the trailer hitch disconnect.
Thanks!
Brian Ehni
(Sent from my iPhone)
It was to reach the trailer hitch disconnect.
Thanks!
Brian Ehni
(Sent from my iPhone)
|
By
BRIAN PAUL EHNI
·
#173319
·
|
|
Re: need help finding a photo
Interesting surgical modifications to the car sides there. Was that to clear the tires on the trailer?
I wonder how much that derated the carrying capacity of the gon. Do you have a date on the
Interesting surgical modifications to the car sides there. Was that to clear the tires on the trailer?
I wonder how much that derated the carrying capacity of the gon. Do you have a date on the
|
By
Schuyler Larrabee
·
#173318
·
|
|
Re: need help finding a photo
Rock Island did the same thing, only with Cadillacs and re-purposed WE gons.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Nelson Moyer <npmoyer@...>
Reply-To:
Rock Island did the same thing, only with Cadillacs and re-purposed WE gons.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Nelson Moyer <npmoyer@...>
Reply-To:
|
By
BRIAN PAUL EHNI
·
#173317
·
|
|
Re: [SPAM]Re: [RealSTMFC] need help finding a photo
That’s really a practical shipping method, because it only requires one loading and one unloading of the individual cars. Much less opportunity of damage. Too bad it’s beyond my era, because that
That’s really a practical shipping method, because it only requires one loading and one unloading of the individual cars. Much less opportunity of damage. Too bad it’s beyond my era, because that
|
By
Nelson Moyer
·
#173316
·
|
|
Re: Ownership Of Tank Cars In 1950
Tony is quite correct in noting that "overlooks" was probably a poor choice of words on my part...
Railroads reported what they were required to report to the two tariffs, and in some cases chose to
Tony is quite correct in noting that "overlooks" was probably a poor choice of words on my part...
Railroads reported what they were required to report to the two tariffs, and in some cases chose to
|
By
Ian Cranstone
·
#173315
·
|
|
Re: Ownership Of Tank Cars In 1950
Ian Cranstone wrote:
Remember, the ORER didn't seek out anything. Each car owner sent in a report, as often as they thought necessary (some would remain unchanged, with original date, for multiple
Ian Cranstone wrote:
Remember, the ORER didn't seek out anything. Each car owner sent in a report, as often as they thought necessary (some would remain unchanged, with original date, for multiple
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#173314
·
|