|
Re: GATX fleet breakdown?
David, Dave, Folks,
All this discussion of GATC tank cars has me looking at my fleet to see how I might both take advantage of Tangents most recent announcement and adjust my fleet. Are there any
David, Dave, Folks,
All this discussion of GATC tank cars has me looking at my fleet to see how I might both take advantage of Tangents most recent announcement and adjust my fleet. Are there any
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#177982
·
|
|
Re: Waynesburg & Washington Railroad
If anyone is interested I made an online map of the W&W:
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1ibeSfl3NNyIdCJ2IfquIhmqESVhe7COt&ll=40.05543117013464%2C-80.28680978050065&z=11
Chris
If anyone is interested I made an online map of the W&W:
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1ibeSfl3NNyIdCJ2IfquIhmqESVhe7COt&ll=40.05543117013464%2C-80.28680978050065&z=11
Chris
|
By
schmuck804_99@...
·
#177981
·
|
|
Re: Storzek & Des Plaines 1916 NYC Auto Box Cars
Don,
Do you have Ted Culotta's article "New York Central "1916" Steel Auto Cars and Rebuilt Steel Auto Cars" from the January 2005 RMC?
Yours Aye,
Garth Groff
Don,
Do you have Ted Culotta's article "New York Central "1916" Steel Auto Cars and Rebuilt Steel Auto Cars" from the January 2005 RMC?
Yours Aye,
Garth Groff
|
By
Garth Groff and Sally Sanford <mallardlodge1000@...>
·
#177980
·
|
|
Re: Waynesburg & Washington Railroad
Bob,
Your best bet is with the Waynesburg & Washington Facebook group.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/wwrailroad
Jim Weinschenker runs that and he has a trove of W&W photos. IIRC, many
Bob,
Your best bet is with the Waynesburg & Washington Facebook group.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/wwrailroad
Jim Weinschenker runs that and he has a trove of W&W photos. IIRC, many
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#177979
·
|
|
Re: Waynesburg & Washington Railroad
Bob,
A book was published some time ago on the W&W:
Bob,
A book was published some time ago on the W&W:
|
By
Jim and Barbara van Gaasbeek
·
#177978
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Steel Beams On PRR Flatcars (Circa 1927-1936)
The far right flat car in this image bears a 7-27 weigh stencil.
Eric Hansmann
Murfreesboro, TN
The far right flat car in this image bears a 7-27 weigh stencil.
Eric Hansmann
Murfreesboro, TN
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#177977
·
|
|
Re: Storzek & Des Plaines 1916 NYC Auto Box Cars
Don Valentine asked:
"Being a Rutland modeler I have a number of these box car and auto car kits and have some questions about two that turn out to be NYC cars, NOT Rutland versions. For those who do
Don Valentine asked:
"Being a Rutland modeler I have a number of these box car and auto car kits and have some questions about two that turn out to be NYC cars, NOT Rutland versions. For those who do
|
By
Benjamin Hom
·
#177976
·
|
|
Photo: Steel Beams On PRR Flatcars (Circa 1927-1936)
Photo: Steel Beams On PRR Flatcars (Circa 1927-1936)
A photo from the Historic Pittsburgh website:
https://historicpittsburgh.org/islandora/object/pitt%3A943.000016.GN/viewer
Scroll on the photo to
Photo: Steel Beams On PRR Flatcars (Circa 1927-1936)
A photo from the Historic Pittsburgh website:
https://historicpittsburgh.org/islandora/object/pitt%3A943.000016.GN/viewer
Scroll on the photo to
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#177975
·
|
|
Waynesburg & Washington Railroad
Waynesburg & Washington Railroad
Does anyone have photos/photo links to the rolling stock of this railroad? Thanks.
From Wikipedia:
The Waynesburg and Washington Railroad was a 28-mile 3 foot gauge
Waynesburg & Washington Railroad
Does anyone have photos/photo links to the rolling stock of this railroad? Thanks.
From Wikipedia:
The Waynesburg and Washington Railroad was a 28-mile 3 foot gauge
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#177974
·
|
|
Re: Storzek & Des Plaines 1916 NYC Auto Box Cars
Being a Rutland modeler I have a number of these box car and auto car kits and have some questions about two that turn out to be NYC cars, NOT Rutland versions. For those wo do not know the difference
Being a Rutland modeler I have a number of these box car and auto car kits and have some questions about two that turn out to be NYC cars, NOT Rutland versions. For those wo do not know the difference
|
By
Donald B. Valentine <riverman_vt@...>
·
#177973
·
|
|
Re: Tank Car Reweigh and Other Markings
Steve,
Um, most shippers did not have scales, so this is nothing special or specific to tank cars. It also does not present any problem. Shippers or consignees had cars weighed by the railroad. Tank
Steve,
Um, most shippers did not have scales, so this is nothing special or specific to tank cars. It also does not present any problem. Shippers or consignees had cars weighed by the railroad. Tank
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#177972
·
|
|
Re: Tank Car Reweigh and Other Markings
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 06:58 PM, Ray Carson wrote:
So in the end, would a Tangent 1936+ scheme tank car fit my 1939 year without making any decal changes? How about older tank cars that are 5+ years
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 06:58 PM, Ray Carson wrote:
So in the end, would a Tangent 1936+ scheme tank car fit my 1939 year without making any decal changes? How about older tank cars that are 5+ years
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#177971
·
|
|
Re: Tank Car Reweigh and Other Markings
I’ll jump into this and hopefully not add to any confusion but there is another reason for not listing the car weight on tank cars back then. Only the largest manufacturers or customers had a scale
I’ll jump into this and hopefully not add to any confusion but there is another reason for not listing the car weight on tank cars back then. Only the largest manufacturers or customers had a scale
|
By
Steve Summers
·
#177970
·
|
|
Re: Tank Car Reweigh and Other Markings
I was mainly confused due to seeing prototype photos with a "reweigh" date taken before photos (don't have any example photos, sorry) and I kept assuming tankers were treated the same as other freight
I was mainly confused due to seeing prototype photos with a "reweigh" date taken before photos (don't have any example photos, sorry) and I kept assuming tankers were treated the same as other freight
|
By
Ray Carson
·
#177969
·
|
|
Re: Tank Car Reweigh and Other Markings
Ray,
I'm not sure why you are confused. Tony's comments are clear. Tank cars are not box cars. They were not required to be reweighed on a regular interval. Their cargos were not billed based on
Ray,
I'm not sure why you are confused. Tony's comments are clear. Tank cars are not box cars. They were not required to be reweighed on a regular interval. Their cargos were not billed based on
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#177968
·
|
|
Tank Car Reweigh and Other Markings
Hello everyone,
With the release of Tangent's new run of 8000 gallon 1917-design tankers, I was interested in something that got me confused months before.
So I was reading on Tony Thompson's blog
Hello everyone,
With the release of Tangent's new run of 8000 gallon 1917-design tankers, I was interested in something that got me confused months before.
So I was reading on Tony Thompson's blog
|
By
Ray Carson
·
#177967
·
|
|
Re: GATX fleet breakdown?
I had a few thoughts vis-a-vis tracking the GATX fleet based on my experiences in working through understanding the Imperial Oil/Transit Company Ltd. to Products Tank Line of Canada fleet, and the
I had a few thoughts vis-a-vis tracking the GATX fleet based on my experiences in working through understanding the Imperial Oil/Transit Company Ltd. to Products Tank Line of Canada fleet, and the
|
By
Ian Cranstone
·
#177966
·
|
|
Re: GATX fleet breakdown?
A fantastic discussion. Loaded with information and I am looking forward to the Tangent GATC type 30 hopefully in both 8K and 10K versions with AB brakes.
Shifting my plain black tank fleet emphasis
A fantastic discussion. Loaded with information and I am looking forward to the Tangent GATC type 30 hopefully in both 8K and 10K versions with AB brakes.
Shifting my plain black tank fleet emphasis
|
By
Ken Adams
·
#177965
·
|
|
Photo: S.P. Gondola 53336 & U.P. Gondola (1921)
Photo: S.P. Gondola 53336 & U.P. Gondola (1921)
A fair quality photo from the Vintage Portland
Photo: S.P. Gondola 53336 & U.P. Gondola (1921)
A fair quality photo from the Vintage Portland
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#177964
·
|
|
GATX fleet breakdown?
I think we have enough information now to make a rough approximation of the GATX fleet composition in the late 1940s.
Assuming that the GATX WW1 fleet buildup (1651 cars in 1914 to 10806 in 1920) was
I think we have enough information now to make a rough approximation of the GATX fleet composition in the late 1940s.
Assuming that the GATX WW1 fleet buildup (1651 cars in 1914 to 10806 in 1920) was
|
By
David
·
#177963
·
|