|
Re: B&O underframes
Can you share the issue date so I can dig around the online archives?
The few images of pre-USRA B&O reefers that I’ve seen have been truss rod cars with a straight steel center sill. The M-15
Can you share the issue date so I can dig around the online archives?
The few images of pre-USRA B&O reefers that I’ve seen have been truss rod cars with a straight steel center sill. The M-15
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#178982
·
|
|
Re: Boxcars
A really good pair of messages Rich, - saved to my reference file. Thanks for making the time and sharing the photos!
Rob
A really good pair of messages Rich, - saved to my reference file. Thanks for making the time and sharing the photos!
Rob
|
By
Robert kirkham
·
#178981
·
|
|
B&O underframes
Dear group
In 1917 the B&O ordered a batch of steel underframe freight reefers. Plans were published in the "Railway Age"
trade magazine. The article stated that the underframe was supplied by
Dear group
In 1917 the B&O ordered a batch of steel underframe freight reefers. Plans were published in the "Railway Age"
trade magazine. The article stated that the underframe was supplied by
|
By
lrkdbn
·
#178980
·
|
|
Photographs in Digests
Hello,
For a while now I have been experiencing loss of photographs appearing in digests.
A comment has been made that only two photographs per message make it into the digest
Is it possible to have
Hello,
For a while now I have been experiencing loss of photographs appearing in digests.
A comment has been made that only two photographs per message make it into the digest
Is it possible to have
|
By
Vera Mills
·
#178979
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Photo: NYC&HR Boxcar 100145
That's exactly what happened to this car, Roger. East Buffalo took this ONE car, and rebuilt with all-new everything as a testbed. All subsequent short boxcar orders were built to the standards of
That's exactly what happened to this car, Roger. East Buffalo took this ONE car, and rebuilt with all-new everything as a testbed. All subsequent short boxcar orders were built to the standards of
|
By
Ray Breyer
·
#178978
·
|
|
Re: Boxcars
Rich,
Really impressive builds. Thank you for stating your techniques on building the cars.
Jim Kubanick.
Morgantown WV
On Monday, November
Rich,
Really impressive builds. Thank you for stating your techniques on building the cars.
Jim Kubanick.
Morgantown WV
On Monday, November
|
By
James E Kubanick
·
#178977
·
|
|
Re: Scalpels
The sterile blade comment was conjecture, with no scientific proof on my part, to back it up. One thing I still use is the Xacto #17 chisel blades (when I can find them) since I can't think of a
The sterile blade comment was conjecture, with no scientific proof on my part, to back it up. One thing I still use is the Xacto #17 chisel blades (when I can find them) since I can't think of a
|
By
John Sykes III
·
#178976
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Photo: NYC&HR Boxcar 100145
A very interesting photo; if I go by the assigned car number, this is a lot 222-B WUF boxcar built in 1907 by ACF to their lot number 4633. The car as shown would then represent a significant
A very interesting photo; if I go by the assigned car number, this is a lot 222-B WUF boxcar built in 1907 by ACF to their lot number 4633. The car as shown would then represent a significant
|
By
ROGER HINMAN
·
#178975
·
|
|
Re: Boxcars
Rob,
You are correct, I only remove the square material where the trucks mount.
I have received other private emails asking about the height difference, and sent the following response:
I
Rob,
You are correct, I only remove the square material where the trucks mount.
I have received other private emails asking about the height difference, and sent the following response:
I
|
By
Richard Remiarz
·
#178974
·
|
|
Re: Boxcars
I had no idea! Thanks for sharing this modification Rich. To clarify - the only modification is removing the square material on the bottom of the bolster where the trucks mount? The first photo has
I had no idea! Thanks for sharing this modification Rich. To clarify - the only modification is removing the square material on the bottom of the bolster where the trucks mount? The first photo has
|
By
Robert kirkham
·
#178973
·
|
|
Re: Scalpels
Lester,
You mention grinding the stiffening rib off scalpel blades to get them to fit an X-acto handle. There is another way. I've had little use for X-acto blades over the years, but at one point at
Lester,
You mention grinding the stiffening rib off scalpel blades to get them to fit an X-acto handle. There is another way. I've had little use for X-acto blades over the years, but at one point at
|
By
Dennis Storzek <destorzek@...>
·
#178972
·
|
|
Re: Boxcars
Thanks so much Rich. I never noticed the difference and am very glad you pointed this out.
Just say'in....and always learn'in
fenton
--
Fenton Wells
250 Frye Rd
Pinehurst NC
Thanks so much Rich. I never noticed the difference and am very glad you pointed this out.
Just say'in....and always learn'in
fenton
--
Fenton Wells
250 Frye Rd
Pinehurst NC
|
By
O Fenton Wells
·
#178971
·
|
|
Re: Scalpels
Scalpels and blades are great; however, I can not argue about the fine edge of the Single Edge Razor Blade (SERB). Both tools help to build a better freight car.
Lester Breuer
Scalpels and blades are great; however, I can not argue about the fine edge of the Single Edge Razor Blade (SERB). Both tools help to build a better freight car.
Lester Breuer
|
By
Lester Breuer
·
#178970
·
|
|
Re: Boxcars
There have been a few requests for information on how I lower the bolsters on the Intermountain boxcars. Years ago I realized that Intermountain boxcars rode too high, especially noticeable when next
There have been a few requests for information on how I lower the bolsters on the Intermountain boxcars. Years ago I realized that Intermountain boxcars rode too high, especially noticeable when next
|
By
Richard Remiarz
·
#178969
·
|
|
Photo: StLB&M Gondola 11050
Photo: StLB&M Gondola 11050
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=3933071
This photo can be enlarged
Photo: StLB&M Gondola 11050
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=3933071
This photo can be enlarged
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#178968
·
|
|
CN Boxcar 483574
CN Boxcar 483574
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=4453759
This photo can be enlarged quite a
CN Boxcar 483574
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=4453759
This photo can be enlarged quite a
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#178967
·
|
|
Photo: Photo: NYC&HR Boxcar 100145
Photo: Photo: NYC&HR Boxcar 100145
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=4427342
This photo can be
Photo: Photo: NYC&HR Boxcar 100145
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=4427342
This photo can be
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#178966
·
|
|
Photo: Lehigh Valley Gondola 32402
Photo: Lehigh Valley Gondola 32402
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=4026586
This photo can be
Photo: Lehigh Valley Gondola 32402
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=4026586
This photo can be
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#178965
·
|
|
Photo: B &O Gondola 262249
Photo: B &O Gondola 262249
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=4026584
This photo can be enlarged
Photo: B &O Gondola 262249
A photo from the National Archives of Canada:
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/CollectionSearch/Pages/record.aspx?app=FonAndCol&IdNumber=4026584
This photo can be enlarged
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#178964
·
|
|
Re: Scalpels
Claus, I think you’re correct, however, I misread your statement to begin with, which made me go measure some dimensions on a SERB, and on a handy eXacto blade.
My SERB is .01” thick and the
Claus, I think you’re correct, however, I misread your statement to begin with, which made me go measure some dimensions on a SERB, and on a handy eXacto blade.
My SERB is .01” thick and the
|
By
Schuyler Larrabee
·
#178963
·
|