|
Re: P&LE USRA rebuild
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Wow! That’s real devotion. Nice model Brian.
Dave Lawler
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Wow! That’s real devotion. Nice model Brian.
Dave Lawler
|
By
Dave Lawler
·
#180684
·
|
|
Re: Photo: D&RGW Gondola 70609 (1952)
Another scene from Montrose clearly showing the size difference between NG and SG. 454 switching an Auto Box. I have a model of this box car I'm building in P48 (O scale).
William
aka drgwk37
Another scene from Montrose clearly showing the size difference between NG and SG. 454 switching an Auto Box. I have a model of this box car I'm building in P48 (O scale).
William
aka drgwk37
|
By
William Reed
·
#180683
·
|
|
Re: P&LE USRA rebuild
Thanks for posting notes on your journey, which seems to end well. Would you show details on the end rivet add?
I finished a straight up Tichy kit earlier this year, but have the Speedwitch doors to
Thanks for posting notes on your journey, which seems to end well. Would you show details on the end rivet add?
I finished a straight up Tichy kit earlier this year, but have the Speedwitch doors to
|
By
Robert Allan
·
#180682
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Photo: C&NW Tank Car 6093 (1947)
It is my understanding the tank cars were used in company fuel service. The western part of the system used oil as a steam engine fuel.
It might have made been used in spraying, but I suspect the
It is my understanding the tank cars were used in company fuel service. The western part of the system used oil as a steam engine fuel.
It might have made been used in spraying, but I suspect the
|
By
ron christensen
·
#180681
·
|
|
Detailing for early tank cars
Given all of the very good recent photographs of tank cars, I am wondering about the availability of detailing kits for these? The usual models of these leave some things to be desired...
Ray
Given all of the very good recent photographs of tank cars, I am wondering about the availability of detailing kits for these? The usual models of these leave some things to be desired...
Ray
|
By
Ray Hutchison
·
#180680
·
|
|
Re: P&LE USRA rebuild
Brian some things are worth the effort. Well done
Fenton
Brian some things are worth the effort. Well done
Fenton
|
By
O Fenton Wells
·
#180679
·
|
|
Re: Photo: C&NW Tank Car 6093 (1947)
I was going to ask, what group of tank cars, and what products, had this sort-of exterior scaffolding built around the tank? An interesting modeling opportunity for sure!
Ray Hutchison
I was going to ask, what group of tank cars, and what products, had this sort-of exterior scaffolding built around the tank? An interesting modeling opportunity for sure!
Ray Hutchison
|
By
Ray Hutchison
·
#180678
·
|
|
Re: Photo: D&RGW Gondola 70609 (1952)
caption on photograph says "metal material in gondola"... but what is in the first of the narrow gauge gondolas at bottom of photo?
(If I was working that day, and saw a group of narrow gauge brought
caption on photograph says "metal material in gondola"... but what is in the first of the narrow gauge gondolas at bottom of photo?
(If I was working that day, and saw a group of narrow gauge brought
|
By
Ray Hutchison
·
#180677
·
|
|
Re: P&LE USRA rebuild
That a great looking car!
Your attention to details shows
George Toman
Willow Springs, IL
That a great looking car!
Your attention to details shows
George Toman
Willow Springs, IL
|
By
gtws00
·
#180676
·
|
|
Re: P&LE USRA rebuild
Nice car!
Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
Nice car!
Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
|
By
al_brown03
·
#180675
·
|
|
Re: Charging Ladles on flat cars
Love how the closest one in Tim’s photo had its spout labeled. Just in case that wasn’t obvious?
What are the ladles in the background, loaded upside down?
Dave
Love how the closest one in Tim’s photo had its spout labeled. Just in case that wasn’t obvious?
What are the ladles in the background, loaded upside down?
Dave
|
By
David Smith
·
#180674
·
|
|
Re: P&LE USRA rebuild
Brian
That looks really good.
Paul Doggett. England 🏴
Brian
That looks really good.
Paul Doggett. England 🏴
|
By
Paul Doggett
·
#180673
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Speas Company Vinegar Tank Car
I was at all of your presentations at the Naperville RPM meet, including the one on the pickle/vinegar industry. You do an outstanding job. I have your very good book on the subject. In fact after a
I was at all of your presentations at the Naperville RPM meet, including the one on the pickle/vinegar industry. You do an outstanding job. I have your very good book on the subject. In fact after a
|
By
Scott Kremer
·
#180672
·
|
|
P&LE USRA rebuild
It’s. Finally. Finished.
Probably my longest semi continuous build is finally done. I’ve posted about this before.
The never-ending model build - P&LE Rebuild
• Tichy kit originally
It’s. Finally. Finished.
Probably my longest semi continuous build is finally done. I’ve posted about this before.
The never-ending model build - P&LE Rebuild
• Tichy kit originally
|
By
Brian Carlson
·
#180671
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Speas Company Vinegar Tank Car
Sorry, I forgot to sign my name
David Leider
Sorry, I forgot to sign my name
David Leider
|
By
David Leider
·
#180670
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Speas Company Vinegar Tank Car
Scott,
You are correct. I have photos of 3 Speas Vinegar cars in my book. There is also a 2 page history of the Speas company. I still have copies of my "Pickle and Vinegar Makers of the Midwest"
Scott,
You are correct. I have photos of 3 Speas Vinegar cars in my book. There is also a 2 page history of the Speas company. I still have copies of my "Pickle and Vinegar Makers of the Midwest"
|
By
David Leider
·
#180669
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Texaco Three-Compartment Tank Car 271 (1936)
Dave Parker replied:
I agree, Dave. I didn't mean to suggest that the strap length defines time of use. I just meant that the USRA cars with Andrews trucks were substantially later than the first
Dave Parker replied:
I agree, Dave. I didn't mean to suggest that the strap length defines time of use. I just meant that the USRA cars with Andrews trucks were substantially later than the first
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#180668
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Texaco Three-Compartment Tank Car 271 (1936)
While there is nothing wrong withe the descriptors "long start" and "short strap", I am not aware of any real basis for saying that one came earlier than the other. The earliest evidence that I can
While there is nothing wrong withe the descriptors "long start" and "short strap", I am not aware of any real basis for saying that one came earlier than the other. The earliest evidence that I can
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#180667
·
|
|
Re: Photo: D&RGW Gondola 70609 (1952)
Neat photo! I wonder if that is some kind of uranium ore from Durango heading up to Grand Junction for refinement. Could be anything I suppose but they are are not going through all that for sand or
Neat photo! I wonder if that is some kind of uranium ore from Durango heading up to Grand Junction for refinement. Could be anything I suppose but they are are not going through all that for sand or
|
By
Scott
·
#180666
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Texaco Three-Compartment Tank Car 271 (1936)
I call these trucks the "long strap" Andrews, unlike the short-strap version used later, for example under USRA cars. (Referring to the steel strap that attaches to the journal boxes.) The earlier
I call these trucks the "long strap" Andrews, unlike the short-strap version used later, for example under USRA cars. (Referring to the steel strap that attaches to the journal boxes.) The earlier
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#180665
·
|