|
Re: GM&O GSC 53' 6" Flat Car Build, Bloomington Shops 1951
The Tichy kit for this car (no.1000) has a separate frame, but does not have as a separate part the portion of the frame that is level with the deck. I believe that the Walthers kit for this car did
The Tichy kit for this car (no.1000) has a separate frame, but does not have as a separate part the portion of the frame that is level with the deck. I believe that the Walthers kit for this car did
|
By
Kenneth Montero
·
#187948
·
|
|
Re: GM&O GSC 53' 6" Flat Car Build, Bloomington Shops 1951
The photos show a wonderful modeling opportunity, with the flatcar decks being assembled on the two tracks, perhaps add frames on the side, or flatcar with the frames aon the track waiting for
The photos show a wonderful modeling opportunity, with the flatcar decks being assembled on the two tracks, perhaps add frames on the side, or flatcar with the frames aon the track waiting for
|
By
Ray Hutchison
·
#187947
·
|
|
Re: X-3 Tank Car Rapido
Hello folks
Thank you all for all the input. So I'm to understand the numbers on the UTLX reporting marked cars will be changed to be the correct ones? If so will rapido reanonce the
Hello folks
Thank you all for all the input. So I'm to understand the numbers on the UTLX reporting marked cars will be changed to be the correct ones? If so will rapido reanonce the
|
By
Dave Boss
·
#187946
·
|
|
Re: X-3 Tank Car Rapido
Hi Tim
I know they offer painted index ones but I don't think any in numbered ones?
Dave
Hi Tim
I know they offer painted index ones but I don't think any in numbered ones?
Dave
|
By
Dave Boss
·
#187945
·
|
|
File /Errata UTLX Steam Era Tank Cars.doc uploaded
#file-notice
The following files have been uploaded to the Files area of the main@RealSTMFC.groups.io group.
/Errata UTLX Steam Era Tank Cars.doc
By: Steve and Barb Hile
The following files have been uploaded to the Files area of the main@RealSTMFC.groups.io group.
/Errata UTLX Steam Era Tank Cars.doc
By: Steve and Barb Hile
|
By
main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Notification <noreply@...>
·
#187944
·
|
|
Re: X-3 Tank Car Rapido
Since I am (somewhat) responsible for part of the original question, there were a few, but very few, errors in the UTLX book. I have created an errata document that I will post on this group’s web
Since I am (somewhat) responsible for part of the original question, there were a few, but very few, errors in the UTLX book. I have created an errata document that I will post on this group’s web
|
By
Steve and Barb Hile
·
#187943
·
|
|
Re: X-3 Tank Car Rapido
Yay! Go Bill !!
Todd Sullivan
Yay! Go Bill !!
Todd Sullivan
|
By
Todd Sullivan
·
#187942
·
|
|
Re: X-3 Tank Car Rapido
Well.... Maybe I'll jump in here before this gets too far down the track!
Yep, I goofed. And Steve caught it. I just have not had a chance to rework the numbers as I am buried in a couple of loco
Well.... Maybe I'll jump in here before this gets too far down the track!
Yep, I goofed. And Steve caught it. I just have not had a chance to rework the numbers as I am buried in a couple of loco
|
By
Bill Schneider
·
#187941
·
|
|
Re: X-3 Tank Car Rapido
The issues concerning consistency between car numbers and physical details were discussed extensively back in September beginning with message 187168. Bill Schneider is well aware of them and is
The issues concerning consistency between car numbers and physical details were discussed extensively back in September beginning with message 187168. Bill Schneider is well aware of them and is
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#187940
·
|
|
Re: X-3 Tank Car Rapido
Rapido welcomes feedback and they will change what ever is necessary to make the product correct. It is still a preorder so there's plenty of time for the corrections, as long as they know about the
Rapido welcomes feedback and they will change what ever is necessary to make the product correct. It is still a preorder so there's plenty of time for the corrections, as long as they know about the
|
By
Matthew Metoyer
·
#187939
·
|
|
Re: X-3 Tank Car Rapido
Thanks for looking into that and letting us know! I think mistakes are a frequent problem
with RTR models and I appreciate the caution. Does Rapido offer any un-numbered cars?
Tim O'Connor
--
*Tim
Thanks for looking into that and letting us know! I think mistakes are a frequent problem
with RTR models and I appreciate the caution. Does Rapido offer any un-numbered cars?
Tim O'Connor
--
*Tim
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#187938
·
|
|
X-3 Tank Car Rapido
Hello Folks
I'm no expert by any means on freight cars, I'm just reaching out to the group to correct me if I'm wrong about this. Rapido has always made a excellent an accurate
Hello Folks
I'm no expert by any means on freight cars, I'm just reaching out to the group to correct me if I'm wrong about this. Rapido has always made a excellent an accurate
|
By
Dave Boss
·
#187937
·
|
|
Re: GM&O GSC 53' 6" Flat Car Build, Bloomington Shops 1951
Aha, now I understand why parts of this thread didn't make sense. The header of this thread, and the D202 decal, both show 53'-6". Now, being a Kansas modeler, I could have expected loads to come in
Aha, now I understand why parts of this thread didn't make sense. The header of this thread, and the D202 decal, both show 53'-6". Now, being a Kansas modeler, I could have expected loads to come in
|
By
mopacfirst
·
#187936
·
|
|
Re: GM&O GSC 53' 6" Flat Car Build, Bloomington Shops 1951
I can't remember if it was these flatcars or the GSC pulpwood racks that GM&O bought but at least one of them (maybe both?) were assembled after delivery using salvaged trucks, brake components, and
I can't remember if it was these flatcars or the GSC pulpwood racks that GM&O bought but at least one of them (maybe both?) were assembled after delivery using salvaged trucks, brake components, and
|
By
Jason P
·
#187935
·
|
|
GM&O GSC 53' 6" Flat Car Build, Bloomington Shops 1951
On the one hand, it seems appropriate that the castings were delivered on a PRR F30a. On the other hand, those were a few feet shorter than the standard GSC flat, so these photos actually show the
On the one hand, it seems appropriate that the castings were delivered on a PRR F30a. On the other hand, those were a few feet shorter than the standard GSC flat, so these photos actually show the
|
By
David
·
#187934
·
|
|
Re: Large Model: MDT Reefer #9000
I cannot help but wonder if a person built this model, including the signs and flatcar would someone question it's prototypicalness? I post tongue in cheek.
George Courtney
I cannot help but wonder if a person built this model, including the signs and flatcar would someone question it's prototypicalness? I post tongue in cheek.
George Courtney
|
By
George Courtney
·
#187933
·
|
|
Re: I received my Rapido X31s today
No email they were being shipped. I did get an email when they received them saying they were about to charge my card. I looked on their website and it showed my order being packed about a
No email they were being shipped. I did get an email when they received them saying they were about to charge my card. I looked on their website and it showed my order being packed about a
|
By
Jeffrey White
·
#187932
·
|
|
Re: Car capacity vs load limit, was Late 40's to mid 50's military rail movements
Looking at the photo of the T43 load, you can see two triangular or wedge shapes underneath the rising track. They appear to be steel, because they are relatively thin and appear to have welds on
Looking at the photo of the T43 load, you can see two triangular or wedge shapes underneath the rising track. They appear to be steel, because they are relatively thin and appear to have welds on
|
By
spsalso
·
#187931
·
|
|
Re: Large Model: MDT Reefer #9000
Thanks Bob and Charlie for sharing images and information on this fascinating model. I estimated it was about 20 feet long making it 1:2 scale!
I wonder what happened to it. Does anyone know?
Thanks Bob and Charlie for sharing images and information on this fascinating model. I estimated it was about 20 feet long making it 1:2 scale!
I wonder what happened to it. Does anyone know?
|
By
Bruce Hendrick
·
#187930
·
|
|
Re: Car capacity vs load limit, was Late 40's to mid 50's military rail movements
Group;
Thanks, Bruce, for the clarifications.
I obviously blew it in relating in this case, the pucker is for the High & Wide guy who has to guarantee it fits within the clearance diagram.
Group;
Thanks, Bruce, for the clarifications.
I obviously blew it in relating in this case, the pucker is for the High & Wide guy who has to guarantee it fits within the clearance diagram.
|
By
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
·
#187929
·
|