|
Re: Photo: PRR Boxcar 570062 (1941)
Bruce Smith wrote:
“The last batch of X29s built, post 1930, were built with experimental AB brakes with a transverse mounted reservoir. When these were upgraded to the more conventional AB
Bruce Smith wrote:
“The last batch of X29s built, post 1930, were built with experimental AB brakes with a transverse mounted reservoir. When these were upgraded to the more conventional AB
|
By
Guy Wilber
·
#194013
·
|
|
Re: 7' wide 10' IH Youngstown door for CRP XM-4
Dennis Storzek wrote:
"Speculation, yes, but I tend to doubt that by this point in time the railroads specified the details of the vendor supplied products... they would order what the vendor
Dennis Storzek wrote:
"Speculation, yes, but I tend to doubt that by this point in time the railroads specified the details of the vendor supplied products... they would order what the vendor
|
By
Guy Wilber
·
#194012
·
|
|
Re: UP 40' Double door automobile car
The model is a combination of two prototype cars. The roof, ends, and side sill match the GN 3000-3499 series built in 1955, while the sides, ends, and doors match the 3500-3999 series built in 1956.
The model is a combination of two prototype cars. The roof, ends, and side sill match the GN 3000-3499 series built in 1955, while the sides, ends, and doors match the 3500-3999 series built in 1956.
|
By
Richard Remiarz
·
#194011
·
|
|
Re: Accurail single sheathed box cars (was CNJ 12000 series)
Very nice. Thanks for sharing.
Gary Ray
On 7/15/2022 4:03 PM, Clark Propst via groups.io wrote:
Very nice. Thanks for sharing.
Gary Ray
On 7/15/2022 4:03 PM, Clark Propst via groups.io wrote:
|
By
Gary Ray
·
#194010
·
|
|
Re: Some Thoughts On Resin Kit Stashes
Ouch! That’s $12-15k for 80 cars. My roster has 465 cars (not all resin) for $16.4k plus the cost of detail parts, paint, trucks, and couplers not in kits. A small percentage of cars are RTR from
Ouch! That’s $12-15k for 80 cars. My roster has 465 cars (not all resin) for $16.4k plus the cost of detail parts, paint, trucks, and couplers not in kits. A small percentage of cars are RTR from
|
By
Nelson Moyer
·
#194009
·
|
|
UP 40' Double door automobile car
This car is the Mckeen Models 40' DD box car. Diagonal panel roof, "banana taper" Dreadnaught end and twin 6' IYSD with a door post centered between the L & R doors. Those ends indicate at least a
This car is the Mckeen Models 40' DD box car. Diagonal panel roof, "banana taper" Dreadnaught end and twin 6' IYSD with a door post centered between the L & R doors. Those ends indicate at least a
|
By
Andy Carlson
·
#194008
·
|
|
Re: Some Thoughts On Resin Kit Stashes
I paid a couple of people to build mine, about 80 cars.
Jared Harper
Athens, GA
I paid a couple of people to build mine, about 80 cars.
Jared Harper
Athens, GA
|
By
Jared Harper
·
#194007
·
|
|
Re: UP 40' Double door automobile car
Thank you Tim and Rich. I appreciate thehelp.
Jim Pattison
Thank you Tim and Rich. I appreciate thehelp.
Jim Pattison
|
By
Jim Pattison
·
#194006
·
|
|
Photo: ACL Automobile Boxcar 51951 (1942)
Photo: ACL Automobile Boxcar 51951 (1942)
Photo from the Library of Congress:
https://www.loc.gov/resource/fsa.8c24430/
Scroll to enlarge.
Description (Is Incorrect):
“Los Angeles County,
Photo: ACL Automobile Boxcar 51951 (1942)
Photo from the Library of Congress:
https://www.loc.gov/resource/fsa.8c24430/
Scroll to enlarge.
Description (Is Incorrect):
“Los Angeles County,
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#194005
·
|
|
Re: UP 40' Double door automobile car
Is that the Accurail model ? It's very similar to many prototypes but I don't think there is any
exact match for the sides + door opening + ends + roof.
Definitely not
Is that the Accurail model ? It's very similar to many prototypes but I don't think there is any
exact match for the sides + door opening + ends + roof.
Definitely not
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#194004
·
|
|
Re: UP 40' Double door automobile car
I take it these are Accurail? Anyhow, this car has the wrong roof for an A-50-16, should be Murphy panel. The only other DD 40' UP would be an A-50-19, but I believe the doors may be too small?
It is
I take it these are Accurail? Anyhow, this car has the wrong roof for an A-50-16, should be Murphy panel. The only other DD 40' UP would be an A-50-19, but I believe the doors may be too small?
It is
|
By
Rich C
·
#194003
·
|
|
Re: 7' wide 10' IH Youngstown door for CRP XM-4
Thanks Doug ! My image file name is now
cnj_22457 40ft_SD_box XM-3 built-1947 exCRP_series-22001-22480 M&StL_ LimeCreekBridge MasonCityIA 1961.SophMarty.jpg
which
Thanks Doug ! My image file name is now
cnj_22457 40ft_SD_box XM-3 built-1947 exCRP_series-22001-22480 M&StL_ LimeCreekBridge MasonCityIA 1961.SophMarty.jpg
which
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#194002
·
|
|
Re: IC 161722 Chcago, 1940's
Yep! Notes L & X in the 1959 ORER list all of these cars whose numbers differ from the norm.
IC 41464 is listed under Note X. No reason is given other than "special loading".
Yep! Notes L & X in the 1959 ORER list all of these cars whose numbers differ from the norm.
IC 41464 is listed under Note X. No reason is given other than "special loading".
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#194001
·
|
|
Re: 7' wide 10' IH Youngstown door for CRP XM-4
Photo taken on the MSTL (Lime Creek bridge) just south of the depot, in Mason City IA, 1961 by Soph Marty.
Doug Harding
https://www.facebook.com/douglas.harding.3156/
Youtube: Douglas Harding
Photo taken on the MSTL (Lime Creek bridge) just south of the depot, in Mason City IA, 1961 by Soph Marty.
Doug Harding
https://www.facebook.com/douglas.harding.3156/
Youtube: Douglas Harding
|
By
Douglas Harding
·
#194000
·
|
|
Re: UTLX Class X Tank Car Build
Thanks Tim. I just realized that it’s actually the last six cars in the stash, because I forgot to consider the Class X in the count, so it’s the last six cars in the stash.
Nelson Moyer
Thanks Tim. I just realized that it’s actually the last six cars in the stash, because I forgot to consider the Class X in the count, so it’s the last six cars in the stash.
Nelson Moyer
|
By
Nelson Moyer
·
#193999
·
|
|
Re: UTLX Class X Tank Car Build
You can download a brief history and photographs of these cars with information about modifications over the years since they were first built in 1907 from the RCW web page. Rebuilds continued to at
You can download a brief history and photographs of these cars with information about modifications over the years since they were first built in 1907 from the RCW web page. Rebuilds continued to at
|
By
Nelson Moyer
·
#193998
·
|
|
Re: IC 161722 Chcago, 1940's
Interestingly, the original photo showing the new car shows it is a 40 ton car; must have been built with older trucks reclaimed from scrapped cars. In this latest photo, that capacity has shrunk to
Interestingly, the original photo showing the new car shows it is a 40 ton car; must have been built with older trucks reclaimed from scrapped cars. In this latest photo, that capacity has shrunk to
|
By
Dennis Storzek <dennis@...>
·
#193997
·
|
|
UP 40' Double door automobile car
I picked up a couple of these cars a longtime ago. Now I am wondering are they even close to being accurate?
Thanks
Jim Pattison
I picked up a couple of these cars a longtime ago. Now I am wondering are they even close to being accurate?
Thanks
Jim Pattison
|
By
Jim Pattison
·
#193996
·
|
|
Re: UTLX Class X Tank Car Build
Nelson/anyone,
First - Nelson this is a good looking build. (The following is -not- a criticism.)
The variety of Nelson's build prompts me to ask "how similar would the dome plus
the equipment on
Nelson/anyone,
First - Nelson this is a good looking build. (The following is -not- a criticism.)
The variety of Nelson's build prompts me to ask "how similar would the dome plus
the equipment on
|
By
Jim Betz
·
#193995
·
|
|
Re: 7' wide 10' IH Youngstown door for CRP XM-4
I was driving near Yakima, Wa. once and saw a fork lift driver using his forks
to move a car a hundred or so yards down a siding. The forks were against
the side of the car not the end. Creative?
I was driving near Yakima, Wa. once and saw a fork lift driver using his forks
to move a car a hundred or so yards down a siding. The forks were against
the side of the car not the end. Creative?
|
By
Jim Betz
·
#193994
·
|