|
Re: General Petroleum Tank Cars - Questions
Ken,
That a lever handbrake, and it works just like every other lever handbrake. Lift up the lever, push or pull to tighten the attached brake chain. A ratchet mechanism allows the tension to be
Ken,
That a lever handbrake, and it works just like every other lever handbrake. Lift up the lever, push or pull to tighten the attached brake chain. A ratchet mechanism allows the tension to be
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#194083
·
|
|
Re: Northern Pacific Automobile Box Car NP 8029
Interesting car and interesting what the photos reveal about it. I was struck by the heavy demarcation between boards the side sheathing of this car. The three quarter angle view is particularly
Interesting car and interesting what the photos reveal about it. I was struck by the heavy demarcation between boards the side sheathing of this car. The three quarter angle view is particularly
|
By
Robert kirkham
·
#194082
·
|
|
General Petroleum Tank Cars - Questions
Can anyone describe the "brake wheel" mechanism on GPCX 259? How did it work?
Ken Montero
Can anyone describe the "brake wheel" mechanism on GPCX 259? How did it work?
Ken Montero
|
By
Kenneth Montero
·
#194081
·
|
|
Re: now - GN 3000 series boxcars
Tim,
Red Caboose must have made more significant changes to the tooling. The Front Range 8’ door car had somewhat narrower panel sizes than the Red Caboose version of the car, so the Front
Tim,
Red Caboose must have made more significant changes to the tooling. The Front Range 8’ door car had somewhat narrower panel sizes than the Red Caboose version of the car, so the Front
|
By
Richard Remiarz
·
#194080
·
|
|
Re: Branchline NWX Reefer
Wowzer Bob, you and Charlie set the bar awfully high
Good looking build
Fenton
Wowzer Bob, you and Charlie set the bar awfully high
Good looking build
Fenton
|
By
O Fenton Wells
·
#194079
·
|
|
Re: Branchline NWX Reefer
Bob
Great looking model! Glad I helped to breakup that sea of red.
--
Charlie Duckworth
Omaha, Ne.
Bob
Great looking model! Glad I helped to breakup that sea of red.
--
Charlie Duckworth
Omaha, Ne.
|
By
Charlie Duckworth
·
#194078
·
|
|
Branchline NWX Reefer
First, a shout-out to Charlie Duckworth for his recent post and fine modeling of the BL NWX reefer. With a stash totally bare of unbuilt resin kits and a layout already overpopulated with red boxcars,
First, a shout-out to Charlie Duckworth for his recent post and fine modeling of the BL NWX reefer. With a stash totally bare of unbuilt resin kits and a layout already overpopulated with red boxcars,
|
By
Bob Chapman
·
#194077
·
|
|
Case Threshing Machine Co. Flat Car 503
Here is a car I have not seen before, Case Threshing Machine Co. flat car No. 503. This photo was taken around April 1924 after Pacific Car & Foundry had built 3' gauge box car No. 1202 for the
Here is a car I have not seen before, Case Threshing Machine Co. flat car No. 503. This photo was taken around April 1924 after Pacific Car & Foundry had built 3' gauge box car No. 1202 for the
|
By
Richard Wilkens
·
#194076
·
|
|
Red Caboose killer-was McKean-Accurail box car (
Bill did not own Red Caboose. He ran it for a non-involved owner whose directions to Bill was simply "don't lose money". When that rule came across these losses RC was bleeding, the decision to cut
Bill did not own Red Caboose. He ran it for a non-involved owner whose directions to Bill was simply "don't lose money". When that rule came across these losses RC was bleeding, the decision to cut
|
By
Andy Carlson
·
#194075
·
|
|
Re: UTLX Class X Tank Car Build
I dunno, Bruce. As in most things, I think it 'depends' on what is being modeled. Large numbers
of 8,000 gallon and lesser numbers of 10,000 gallon tank cars ARA III/ICC103 were
I dunno, Bruce. As in most things, I think it 'depends' on what is being modeled. Large numbers
of 8,000 gallon and lesser numbers of 10,000 gallon tank cars ARA III/ICC103 were
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#194074
·
|
|
Re: Red Caboose killer-was McKean-Accurail box car (
Andy
OMG it wasn't the trucks so much as the wheel sets! I'm fairly sure those also were a Front Range
legacy, since I have some Front Range kits with those horrible
Andy
OMG it wasn't the trucks so much as the wheel sets! I'm fairly sure those also were a Front Range
legacy, since I have some Front Range kits with those horrible
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#194073
·
|
|
Re: General Petroleum Tank Cars
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 02:48 PM, Eric Hansmann wrote:
Neat cars. I see US Safety Appliance stencils on both cars. This lettering requirement was eliminated in 1925
GPCX 259 has a builder stencil on
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 02:48 PM, Eric Hansmann wrote:
Neat cars. I see US Safety Appliance stencils on both cars. This lettering requirement was eliminated in 1925
GPCX 259 has a builder stencil on
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#194072
·
|
|
Re: McKean-Accurail box car (was UP 40' Double door automobile car)
Rich
Oh, WOW, I never noticed that !! Yes, the panel sizes are incorrect on the Red Caboose 8 foot door cars
because the original Front Range tooling had the wrong
Rich
Oh, WOW, I never noticed that !! Yes, the panel sizes are incorrect on the Red Caboose 8 foot door cars
because the original Front Range tooling had the wrong
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#194071
·
|
|
Re: UTLX Class X Tank Car Build
Adding to Bruce's observations, I discovered a tank car detention report for Port Chicago from November 1944 in the San Bruno branch of the National Archives and wrote a blog post about it in 2012.
Adding to Bruce's observations, I discovered a tank car detention report for Port Chicago from November 1944 in the San Bruno branch of the National Archives and wrote a blog post about it in 2012.
|
By
John Barry
·
#194070
·
|
|
A Non too subtle stairstep freight on the SP&S
Bruce mentioned a train of boxcars with a stairstep effect and here is one on the SP&S:
Bruce mentioned a train of boxcars with a stairstep effect and here is one on the SP&S:
|
By
gary laakso
·
#194069
·
|
|
Re: General Petroleum Tank Cars
Neat cars. I see US Safety Appliance stencils on both cars. This lettering requirement was eliminated in 1925
GPCX 259 has a builder stencil on the frame above the left truck: Built 2 (or 8) 1918 by
Neat cars. I see US Safety Appliance stencils on both cars. This lettering requirement was eliminated in 1925
GPCX 259 has a builder stencil on the frame above the left truck: Built 2 (or 8) 1918 by
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#194068
·
|
|
Re: Bangor & Aroostook Refrigerator Car BAR 2447
Chris
The artwork you sent shows two PC&F cars. Easily recognized by the roof overhang on the ends!
Your photo shows two New Haven PC&F cars.
Bryan
Chris
The artwork you sent shows two PC&F cars. Easily recognized by the roof overhang on the ends!
Your photo shows two New Haven PC&F cars.
Bryan
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#194067
·
|
|
Re: UTLX Class X Tank Car Build
Clarence,
I would disagree with you on this. Since "modern day" (for this list is 1959), we'll only talk about this and backwards. Tanks cars in petroleum service ranged from 6,000 to 12,000 gallons,
Clarence,
I would disagree with you on this. Since "modern day" (for this list is 1959), we'll only talk about this and backwards. Tanks cars in petroleum service ranged from 6,000 to 12,000 gallons,
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#194066
·
|
|
Red Caboose killer-was McKean-Accurail box car (
Bill told me that the economic hit the on-the-ropes Red Caboose got was from the money spent upgrading the former Front Range 40' box cars. The sales were way below expectations and I would wager that
Bill told me that the economic hit the on-the-ropes Red Caboose got was from the money spent upgrading the former Front Range 40' box cars. The sales were way below expectations and I would wager that
|
By
Andy Carlson
·
#194065
·
|
|
General Petroleum Tank Cars
Besides building new freight cars Pacific Car & Foundry also rebuilt numerous cars. In 1927 they cleaned and painted 5 tank cars for General Petroleum in Seattle. Here are photos of GPCX 203 and 259.
Besides building new freight cars Pacific Car & Foundry also rebuilt numerous cars. In 1927 they cleaned and painted 5 tank cars for General Petroleum in Seattle. Here are photos of GPCX 203 and 259.
|
By
Richard Wilkens
·
#194064
·
|