|
Early pressure tank car photos needed
I need a few photos of the very earliest pressure spec tank cars, eg. 105 or
better yet Type V. A 104 or Type IV would also be nice. Does anybody have
any they could scan and send, or refer me to
I need a few photos of the very earliest pressure spec tank cars, eg. 105 or
better yet Type V. A 104 or Type IV would also be nice. Does anybody have
any they could scan and send, or refer me to
|
By
CBarkan@...
·
#29580
·
|
|
Origin of stub sill 111 tank cars
What Tim relates below (as he acknowledges from the book "Rockefeller's
Secret Weapon") is the birth of the modern, stub sill, class 111 tank car, far and
away the most common tank car today. I am
What Tim relates below (as he acknowledges from the book "Rockefeller's
Secret Weapon") is the birth of the modern, stub sill, class 111 tank car, far and
away the most common tank car today. I am
|
By
CBarkan@...
·
#29579
·
|
|
Re: Wheel reports -US content in Canadian reports
Thanks for that good info Ben. I've posted the two incorrect numbers as
JPEG's in the files section in a folder titled CPR Wheel Report images.
Looking at them at 200%, I now make them out to be
Thanks for that good info Ben. I've posted the two incorrect numbers as
JPEG's in the files section in a folder titled CPR Wheel Report images.
Looking at them at 200%, I now make them out to be
|
By
Rob Kirkham <rdkirkham@...>
·
#29570
·
|
|
Re: DL&W anthracite car
Now I hope I'm not taking liberties with my good friend Pierre
Oliver who brought this matter up, but I have a copy of the print
mentioned which shows DL&W converted stock car 50242 in the
Now I hope I'm not taking liberties with my good friend Pierre
Oliver who brought this matter up, but I have a copy of the print
mentioned which shows DL&W converted stock car 50242 in the
|
By
Ian Wilson
·
#29568
·
|
|
Re: UTLX Tankcars
Richard Hendrickson wrote:
In 1953, UTLX began to develop a frameless car again. This one they called the "hot dog." It was a controversial design and, thus, was subject to many tests. The 1953
Richard Hendrickson wrote:
In 1953, UTLX began to develop a frameless car again. This one they called the "hot dog." It was a controversial design and, thus, was subject to many tests. The 1953
|
By
Tim Gilbert <tgilbert@...>
·
#29567
·
|
|
Re: Wheel reports -US content in Canadian reports
Rob Kirkham wrote:
"Here is a list of all the U.S. RR cars - no guarantee I've read the
initials correctly. Some I list as illegible. My familiarity with
some of the lines is NIL, and I haven't
Rob Kirkham wrote:
"Here is a list of all the U.S. RR cars - no guarantee I've read the
initials correctly. Some I list as illegible. My familiarity with
some of the lines is NIL, and I haven't
|
By
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
·
#29566
·
|
|
Re: DL&W anthracite car
ian@... writes:
Ian, thanks very much for posting it. In fact, if you don't mind, I'd like
to share the link with the Lackawanna-oriented lists.
That's the first time I've seen
ian@... writes:
Ian, thanks very much for posting it. In fact, if you don't mind, I'd like
to share the link with the Lackawanna-oriented lists.
That's the first time I've seen
|
By
MDelvec952
·
#29569
·
|
|
Re: Modeling Duryea underframes
The B&O's version of the Duryea differed from the ATSF (and others'). I
cannot recall all the details but in general the B&O used solid underframe members
where other roads' versions used an open
The B&O's version of the Duryea differed from the ATSF (and others'). I
cannot recall all the details but in general the B&O used solid underframe members
where other roads' versions used an open
|
By
CBarkan@...
·
#29565
·
|
|
Re: Loads: Weight of steel beams
Dear Scott,
I don't want to sound patronising but you have made a common error - 1:87 is
the linear scale, but since you are converting volume you need to cube it,
to give you a multiplier of
Dear Scott,
I don't want to sound patronising but you have made a common error - 1:87 is
the linear scale, but since you are converting volume you need to cube it,
to give you a multiplier of
|
By
Richard White
·
#29564
·
|
|
Re: UTLX Tankcars
Brian, both kits are for narrow gauge cars as used on the D&RGW 3' gauge
lines in the 1930s through '50s. There is also a standard gauge kit for
the frameless car, which is essentially the same kit
Brian, both kits are for narrow gauge cars as used on the D&RGW 3' gauge
lines in the 1930s through '50s. There is also a standard gauge kit for
the frameless car, which is essentially the same kit
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#29563
·
|
|
Re: UTLX Tankcars
Railroad Model Craftsman
December 1995
Article by Richard Hendrickson
Yes, you MIGHT be able to justify one in 1957.
Scott Pitzer
Railroad Model Craftsman
December 1995
Article by Richard Hendrickson
Yes, you MIGHT be able to justify one in 1957.
Scott Pitzer
|
By
Scott Pitzer
·
#29562
·
|
|
Re: Loads: Weight of steel beams
Based on Mike Aufderheide's and Fred Swanson's replies, it seems that my eight 44' beams would be somewhere around 120,000 lbs., so I think I'll go with that.
But I also tried mixing parts of other
Based on Mike Aufderheide's and Fred Swanson's replies, it seems that my eight 44' beams would be somewhere around 120,000 lbs., so I think I'll go with that.
But I also tried mixing parts of other
|
By
Scott Pitzer
·
#29561
·
|
|
UTLX Tankcars
I was looking through my new Precision Scale HO & HOn3 Passenger and Freight
car Super-detailing Parts and Kits Catalog and on page 45 I came upon two
UTLX tankcar kits. Kit one is a frameless tank
I was looking through my new Precision Scale HO & HOn3 Passenger and Freight
car Super-detailing Parts and Kits Catalog and on page 45 I came upon two
UTLX tankcar kits. Kit one is a frameless tank
|
By
Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
·
#29560
·
|
|
DL&W anthracite car
Not only would I like to see a photo of a converted DL&W converted
stock car but I'd like to get a silver halide print.
Where did you get the original? What size?
Do you know anyone who can make a
Not only would I like to see a photo of a converted DL&W converted
stock car but I'd like to get a silver halide print.
Where did you get the original? What size?
Do you know anyone who can make a
|
By
ed_mines
·
#29559
·
|
|
Re: CIX & BM bulkhead flat cars
Try Dave Barlow 603-432-5054. He has a lot of freight car
info and was very good friends with Harry Frye who was a
living encyclopedia of B&M information. He may know if Harry
had any photos of them
Try Dave Barlow 603-432-5054. He has a lot of freight car
info and was very good friends with Harry Frye who was a
living encyclopedia of B&M information. He may know if Harry
had any photos of them
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#29558
·
|
|
Re: RPCyc 10
The cover can be T---- Pink for all I care, always great content is what counts and no-one delivers better!
Clark Propst <cepropst@...> wrote:I too noticed how close the color of this cover
The cover can be T---- Pink for all I care, always great content is what counts and no-one delivers better!
Clark Propst <cepropst@...> wrote:I too noticed how close the color of this cover
|
By
George Hollwedel <georgeloop1338@...>
·
#29557
·
|
|
Wheel reports -US content in Canadian reports
I've just quickly thumbed through the one report I have from the CPR dated
January 1943, in the Quebec/New Brunswick/Maine area, where there was a
connection to the BAR. The mix is slightly higher
I've just quickly thumbed through the one report I have from the CPR dated
January 1943, in the Quebec/New Brunswick/Maine area, where there was a
connection to the BAR. The mix is slightly higher
|
By
Rob Kirkham <rdkirkham@...>
·
#29556
·
|
|
Re: RPCyc 10
I too noticed how close the color of this cover is to others. But, I remember at the last Naperville either Ed or Pat asking guys (and maybe myself) what color they would like to see on the next
I too noticed how close the color of this cover is to others. But, I remember at the last Naperville either Ed or Pat asking guys (and maybe myself) what color they would like to see on the next
|
By
Clark Propst <cepropst@...>
·
#29555
·
|
|
Re: RPCyc 10
Ed, a great issue keep them coming!. Any thought of releasing the out of stock ones, I need Vol 2.
Brian J Carlson P.E.
Cheektowaga NY
Ed, a great issue keep them coming!. Any thought of releasing the out of stock ones, I need Vol 2.
Brian J Carlson P.E.
Cheektowaga NY
|
By
Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
·
#29553
·
|
|
Re: Loads: Weight of steel beams
-A w40x326 is 40" tall by 326 pounds per foot and is 17.91wide. So
that would make one beam 44' long 14344lb. This is the largest 40"
beam that I know of. I hope this helps.
Fred Swanson
go in a
-A w40x326 is 40" tall by 326 pounds per foot and is 17.91wide. So
that would make one beam 44' long 14344lb. This is the largest 40"
beam that I know of. I hope this helps.
Fred Swanson
go in a
|
By
Fred Swanson <fredswanson@...>
·
#29552
·
|