|
Re: 1932 ARA Boxcars: A Contrarian View
BTW, is there a list of all F&C kits someplace? I couldn't find a web site
for them, and I also didn't see any product information from them on the
STMFC web
BTW, is there a list of all F&C kits someplace? I couldn't find a web site
for them, and I also didn't see any product information from them on the
STMFC web
|
By
Pete Brown \(YahooGroups\) <YahooLists@...>
·
#36557
·
|
|
Re: 1932 ARA Boxcars: A Contrarian View
Different ends, and in the case of the WM (4th largest number built and
surviving) the cushioned frame, custom ladders and stirrup steps, and roof
that (I believe) was different from many of the
Different ends, and in the case of the WM (4th largest number built and
surviving) the cushioned frame, custom ladders and stirrup steps, and roof
that (I believe) was different from many of the
|
By
Pete Brown \(YahooGroups\) <YahooLists@...>
·
#36556
·
|
|
Re: Tank Car ID Help Needed
Tim is correct that this is a Dow Chemical Co. tank car, in this case a 10K
gal. ICC-104 (or insulated ICC-103, which amounts to the same thing) built
in the 1920s by the Standard Tank Car Co. - note
Tim is correct that this is a Dow Chemical Co. tank car, in this case a 10K
gal. ICC-104 (or insulated ICC-103, which amounts to the same thing) built
in the 1920s by the Standard Tank Car Co. - note
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#36555
·
|
|
Re: Tank Car ID Help Needed
Ted Culotta replied:
In the April 1955 ORER, the only Dow cars listed were from their Texas Division (128 cars - all ICC-103's having five or six digit numbers) and 3 cars from their Canadian
Ted Culotta replied:
In the April 1955 ORER, the only Dow cars listed were from their Texas Division (128 cars - all ICC-103's having five or six digit numbers) and 3 cars from their Canadian
|
By
Tim Gilbert <tgilbert@...>
·
#36554
·
|
|
Re: Tank Car ID Help Needed
Looks like a Dow Chemical tank car. The Ohio, Kanahwa and
other river valleys in that region had (still have) lots of
chemical plants. Judging by the type of car (insulated 103)
I would guess it's for
Looks like a Dow Chemical tank car. The Ohio, Kanahwa and
other river valleys in that region had (still have) lots of
chemical plants. Judging by the type of car (insulated 103)
I would guess it's for
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#36553
·
|
|
Re: Tank Car ID Help Needed
Scott:
It looks to me like a Dow ICC 104 insulated car, but that's a guess
based upon the shape of the emblem.
Regards,
Ted Culotta
Speedwitch Media
100 14th Avenue, San Mateo, CA
Scott:
It looks to me like a Dow ICC 104 insulated car, but that's a guess
based upon the shape of the emblem.
Regards,
Ted Culotta
Speedwitch Media
100 14th Avenue, San Mateo, CA
|
By
Ted Culotta <tculotta@...>
·
#36552
·
|
|
Tank Car ID Help Needed
Following is a link to my personal web page.
http://home.comcast.net/~sseders/tankcar.html
I have uploaded an enlarged portion of a photo taken in August, 1956 of an
empty hopper train departing
Following is a link to my personal web page.
http://home.comcast.net/~sseders/tankcar.html
I have uploaded an enlarged portion of a photo taken in August, 1956 of an
empty hopper train departing
|
By
Scott Seders
·
#36551
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Wabash Gondola
Thanks Chet. "Follow the Flag".
Victor Baird
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Thanks Chet. "Follow the Flag".
Victor Baird
Fort Wayne, Indiana
|
By
wabash2813 <vbaird@...>
·
#36550
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Wabash Gondola
of
The data and photos that came with the order
size
for
Victor,
Wabash steel gons were painted black including trucks. White paint
or stencil paste was used for the lettering. The lettering
of
The data and photos that came with the order
size
for
Victor,
Wabash steel gons were painted black including trucks. White paint
or stencil paste was used for the lettering. The lettering
|
By
Chet French <cfrench@...>
·
#36549
·
|
|
Re: A-50-4 Reporting Marks was:Trix cars
Ian,
Thank you for the information. That is a lot of
"light" to shed.
Regards,
Mike
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs.
Ian,
Thank you for the information. That is a lot of
"light" to shed.
Regards,
Mike
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Jazz up your holiday email with celebrity designs.
|
By
Michael Aufderheide
·
#36548
·
|
|
Sunshine Wabash Gondola
I'm in the process of ordering three of these puppies and a number of
other forty foot gondolas. Hopefully we'll get some more steam
era "forty foot" permeations and combinations as time goes
I'm in the process of ordering three of these puppies and a number of
other forty foot gondolas. Hopefully we'll get some more steam
era "forty foot" permeations and combinations as time goes
|
By
wabash2813 <vbaird@...>
·
#36547
·
|
|
Re: Early '50s C&S Denver yard photo
<snip>I wonder if Byron is a nut case because he's such a good modeler, or
Richard-
I hope the good modeling follows being a nut case because I've got the
first step nailed.
Walter M. Clark
Time
<snip>I wonder if Byron is a nut case because he's such a good modeler, or
Richard-
I hope the good modeling follows being a nut case because I've got the
first step nailed.
Walter M. Clark
Time
|
By
Walter M. Clark
·
#36546
·
|
|
Re: "Prototype Model Railroading"
<snip>It will not be published on any set schedule, but I am toying
Ted-
Considering the machinations I went through after I joined this list
and managed to get the back issues of RPC I'd be happy
<snip>It will not be published on any set schedule, but I am toying
Ted-
Considering the machinations I went through after I joined this list
and managed to get the back issues of RPC I'd be happy
|
By
Walter M. Clark
·
#36545
·
|
|
Re: Populations vs. model numbers
Richard:
Bob Webber:
I think that's a no-brainer. And I bought ribsides.
SGL
Richard:
Bob Webber:
I think that's a no-brainer. And I bought ribsides.
SGL
|
By
Schuyler Larrabee
·
#36543
·
|
|
reefer question
Hi Guys
I have been wondering about this for a while. I have seen a cutaway of an
average wood reefer. I am wondering why the large ice blocks don't crash
straight through the floor when dropped from
Hi Guys
I have been wondering about this for a while. I have seen a cutaway of an
average wood reefer. I am wondering why the large ice blocks don't crash
straight through the floor when dropped from
|
By
Bill Lane <billlane@...>
·
#36544
·
|
|
Re: Populations vs. model numbers
Bob Webber ask...
"I wonder about that. Will a Milwaukee Road Rib Side box sell enough copies to pay for the tooling? One would think that a B&O wagon-top could sell more than a rib-side."
I would
Bob Webber ask...
"I wonder about that. Will a Milwaukee Road Rib Side box sell enough copies to pay for the tooling? One would think that a B&O wagon-top could sell more than a rib-side."
I would
|
By
Greg Martin
·
#36542
·
|
|
Re: ARA 1932 box car book
Phil Buchwald asked:
"X32?"
No. PRR 36986, Class X35:
http://prr.railfan.net/freight/PRRdiagrams.html?diag=x35.gif&fr=cl
Class X32 is the 50 ft round roof automobile boxcar (no end
Phil Buchwald asked:
"X32?"
No. PRR 36986, Class X35:
http://prr.railfan.net/freight/PRRdiagrams.html?diag=x35.gif&fr=cl
Class X32 is the 50 ft round roof automobile boxcar (no end
|
By
Benjamin Hom <b.hom@...>
·
#36541
·
|
|
Re: Populations vs. model numbers
I wonder about that. Will a Milwaukee Road Rib Side box sell enough copies to pay for the tooling? One would think that a B&O wagon-top could sell more than a rib-side.
I wonder about that. Will a Milwaukee Road Rib Side box sell enough copies to pay for the tooling? One would think that a B&O wagon-top could sell more than a rib-side.
|
By
Bob Webber <zephyr1@...>
·
#36540
·
|
|
Populations vs. model numbers
Richard strongest point is...
Will a really good styrene model of a B&O wagon-top box car sell enough copies to even pay for the tooling? Nobody
knows, though sooner or later we'll probably find out
Richard strongest point is...
Will a really good styrene model of a B&O wagon-top box car sell enough copies to even pay for the tooling? Nobody
knows, though sooner or later we'll probably find out
|
By
Greg Martin
·
#36539
·
|
|
Re: ARA 1932 box car book
X32?
Phil Buchwald
By
buchwaldfam <duff@...>
·
#36538
·
|