Andy Miller wrote: "ATSF also had cars similar to this but that required even more work. I don't recall of the top of my head what it was." An easier approach to the SFRD plug door reefers is to use

From Garrett Rea: Everyone on this list is nuts, otherwise why would we be doing this? That said, I think I see what you're talking about, but I don't think the end side panels are wider than the

Stefan, As Ben Hom said, they are at best stand-ins. That said, several companies ran cars similar to this in the last era of ice reefers. Plug doors were becoming popular but roof heights could not

Rob: Not so sure that it is a different style number. I think that it is some sort of mark on the side of the car. Thanks, Rich Ramik _____ Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 8:48

Looks like the second 7 has a dirt speck or something like the right hand side of the car, not a different letter style Rob Kirkham <rdkirkham@...> wrote: An interesting photo of this car can be

An interesting photo of this car can be seen at http://www.livinglandscapes.bc.ca/cgi-bin/view?seq=1&thread=kcm0204&hilite=train&mag=1&op=ZoomIn Something I found odd was the appearance of two

Rob Kirkham wrote: Actually, the first three digits of the car number all look different from the slab-serif, heavy stroke characters used by FGE and associates, which can be seen in the last

I will add to the useful analyses provided by resident engineers Tony Thompson and Jeff English that X29-style plate steel ends had internal stiffeners in the form of vertical hat-shaped end posts

Thanks Ben! I had a feeling these were only stand-ins. Stefan kit is anyone. truss SS Western), CN, all of these 1980s; you January convincing cars; the "braced end" break up doing X29

Stefan Lerch� asked: "Is there a prototype for either of these cars? The steel car (Walthers #932-3223) looks like a old ARA design but with a big plug door, so it was obviously a late 1950s

Experimental pressed sheet steel corrugated ends were around before 1910. NYC's first experimental use was 1912 and their first production application of them was 1914. This might not be clear to

Dean Payne wrote: It's primarily stiffness, not strength, Dean; the strength depends on the thickness of the steel sheet, while the stiffness depends on the geometry of its arrangement. Think

Railroad Prototype Modelers Seminar - East Sponsored by Division 2, MCR-NMRA 1:00pm Friday, March 11 through 11:00pm Saturday, March 12, 2005 Registration will begin at 10:00am. Set up any time

Stefan -- These are Walthers production of the old Train Miniature cars, AFAIK. As such, they were a godsend when first produced, as they offered different bodies from what small variety was

A friend pointed to a photo and said "It can't be too early, it has corrugated ends", after which I told him corrugated ends were much earlier than he thought. The USRA box cars had corrugated ends

Ok, I came across a few of these cars which I obviously picked up a long time ago in a moment of madness;-). Is there a prototype for either of these cars? The steel car (Walthers #932-3223)looks

and black lower bodies? I have a single and double dome insulated tank cars ready for lettering. Yeah, I should have gotten the decals first!! Gary, a long time friend of mine told me, that he had

Phil Buchwald asked: Sure is, and has been since first printed (now in second edition and third printing). You could check our website (URL below) for such a question. Tony Thompson

Mike Brock wrote: "Now...before you exclaim...why do I care, I model the NYC or Pennsy or some such thing, I would remind you that these things wandered widely...the photo in RP Cyc 9 showing one in

I compared the Sunshine kit to the W&R import and noticed that the brake system is radically different. The W&R in each of the three versions imported uses the odd extra brake lever (for a total of