|
Is this a Simplex bolster?
Hello everyone,
I posted this message last week, but it seems to have been lost in the
shuffle, so I'll try again. I've posted a picture of the A-end truck
of WAG 4003, an ex-B&O M-41 boxcar, in
Hello everyone,
I posted this message last week, but it seems to have been lost in the
shuffle, so I'll try again. I've posted a picture of the A-end truck
of WAG 4003, an ex-B&O M-41 boxcar, in
|
By
Mark Heiden
·
#40537
·
|
|
Re: C of Ga Vent Car Photos
Gene, try this link http://groups.yahoo.com/group/STMFPH/
I'm at work but off the top of my head the vent cars started at 55001 and ran to 58500, but I could be wrong as there were a couple of
Gene, try this link http://groups.yahoo.com/group/STMFPH/
I'm at work but off the top of my head the vent cars started at 55001 and ran to 58500, but I could be wrong as there were a couple of
|
By
centga@...
·
#40536
·
|
|
Re: C of Ga Vent Car Photos
It's not in the STMFC photos section, it's in the STMFCPH photos section. Different group that Mike set up just for photos. Try:
STMFPH-subscribe@...
I had to go through the same thing
It's not in the STMFC photos section, it's in the STMFCPH photos section. Different group that Mike set up just for photos. Try:
STMFPH-subscribe@...
I had to go through the same thing
|
By
Tom or Gail Madden <tgmadden@...>
·
#40535
·
|
|
Re: C of Ga Vent Car Photos
to STMFCPH. Todd Horton
>
>
>
Can't find photo. What am I doing wrong?
What was the number series for these CofG ventilated box cars?
Gene Green
to STMFCPH. Todd Horton
>
>
>
Can't find photo. What am I doing wrong?
What was the number series for these CofG ventilated box cars?
Gene Green
|
By
bierglaeser <bierglaeser@...>
·
#40534
·
|
|
Re: Digest Number 2403
In a message dated 4/14/2005 6:39:48 PM Central Standard Time,
STMFC@... writes:
No need to panic, Jerry. L-L hasn't given up on P2K and in fact there
are some new freight cars in the
In a message dated 4/14/2005 6:39:48 PM Central Standard Time,
STMFC@... writes:
No need to panic, Jerry. L-L hasn't given up on P2K and in fact there
are some new freight cars in the
|
By
asychis@...
·
#40533
·
|
|
Re: B&LE Gon #34894
I stand corrected, the Builders date is 4-40.
Tom Olsen
Thomas M. Olsen wrote:
I stand corrected, the Builders date is 4-40.
Tom Olsen
Thomas M. Olsen wrote:
|
By
Thomas M. Olsen <tmolsen@...>
·
#40531
·
|
|
Re: B&LE Gon #34894
In regard to this photo, when did the B&LE dispose of this car series. It shows a Built date 4-42, but unfortunately, my registers only date back to 10/49 and the one I have does not show this car
In regard to this photo, when did the B&LE dispose of this car series. It shows a Built date 4-42, but unfortunately, my registers only date back to 10/49 and the one I have does not show this car
|
By
Thomas M. Olsen <tmolsen@...>
·
#40530
·
|
|
Re: Digest Number 2404
In a message dated 4/15/2005 4:16:09 AM Eastern Standard Time,
STMFC@... writes:
The current coupler is mounted with a screw and washer
thru the slot and no centering/buffer springs -
In a message dated 4/15/2005 4:16:09 AM Eastern Standard Time,
STMFC@... writes:
The current coupler is mounted with a screw and washer
thru the slot and no centering/buffer springs -
|
By
Malcolm H. Houck
·
#40532
·
|
|
Re: LifeLike Proto 2000? Going, Going, Gone?
Ted Culotta wrote:
So digitize the video and grab a good frame . . .
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2942 Linden Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
Ted Culotta wrote:
So digitize the video and grab a good frame . . .
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2942 Linden Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#40529
·
|
|
Re: LifeLike Proto 2000? Going, Going, Gone?
But the gondola wasn't a cut-down version of a Mather box or stock car... and they didn't attempt a rectangular wooden tank car-- otherwise P2K could make use of previous tooling!
Scott
But the gondola wasn't a cut-down version of a Mather box or stock car... and they didn't attempt a rectangular wooden tank car-- otherwise P2K could make use of previous tooling!
Scott
|
By
Scott Pitzer
·
#40528
·
|
|
Re: LifeLike Proto 2000? Going, Going, Gone?
Yes, there actually was a gondola built by Mather (C&IM 9250-9349, blt. 1943) and I would pay handsomely for a publishable photo of one. It's one of the few Emergency cars for which I am still
Yes, there actually was a gondola built by Mather (C&IM 9250-9349, blt. 1943) and I would pay handsomely for a publishable photo of one. It's one of the few Emergency cars for which I am still
|
By
Ted Culotta <tculotta@...>
·
#40527
·
|
|
Re: Movies
Sorry about that, I meant to... (you know the rest!)
Sorry about that, I meant to... (you know the rest!)
|
By
Scott Pitzer
·
#40526
·
|
|
Movies
Al,
Do you have "The Walking Dead" with Boris Karloff? My mother was ten or eleven when it came out and it made a BIG impression!
Scott Pitzer
Al,
Do you have "The Walking Dead" with Boris Karloff? My mother was ten or eleven when it came out and it made a BIG impression!
Scott Pitzer
|
By
Scott Pitzer
·
#40525
·
|
|
Re: wanted Oct. 1941 ORER
Bill - I'll probably see you and/or Randy this weekend but remember, not every road made a new submission every quarter. Look carefully at the submission date at the bottom of the listing to
Bill - I'll probably see you and/or Randy this weekend but remember, not every road made a new submission every quarter. Look carefully at the submission date at the bottom of the listing to
|
By
Westerfield <westerfield@...>
·
#40523
·
|
|
Re: LifeLike Proto 2000? Going, Going, Gone?
Was there ever a Mather gondola, or a Mather tank car? <G>
Scott Pitzer
=======
L-L hasn't given up on P2K and in fact there
are some new freight cars in the works, though that's all I can tell
Was there ever a Mather gondola, or a Mather tank car? <G>
Scott Pitzer
=======
L-L hasn't given up on P2K and in fact there
are some new freight cars in the works, though that's all I can tell
|
By
Scott Pitzer
·
#40524
·
|
|
Re: Scratch BL&E USRA thread, check your IL......
The car number for the NSS gon in the 1943 CBC is 1200. 40' 50-ton car. It
also has the tabs you mentioned at the bolster sides.
Brian J Carlson P.E.
Cheektowaga NY
The car number for the NSS gon in the 1943 CBC is 1200. 40' 50-ton car. It
also has the tabs you mentioned at the bolster sides.
Brian J Carlson P.E.
Cheektowaga NY
|
By
Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
·
#40522
·
|
|
Re: Sergent Coupler Scale Gearbox Mod
Very nice. Thanks for posting that, John.
Pete
_____________________________________________________
Pete Brown - Gambrills, MD (Near Annapolis)
Visit my personal site :
Very nice. Thanks for posting that, John.
Pete
_____________________________________________________
Pete Brown - Gambrills, MD (Near Annapolis)
Visit my personal site :
|
By
Pete Brown \(YahooGroups\) <YahooLists@...>
·
#40521
·
|
|
Re: Steam Era Freight Car - HO Scale
Jim Betz wrote:
Sure. Just check carefully first to find out what height the milled-off portion needs to be from the rail so your new coupler will work right.
Tony Thompson Editor,
Jim Betz wrote:
Sure. Just check carefully first to find out what height the milled-off portion needs to be from the rail so your new coupler will work right.
Tony Thompson Editor,
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#40520
·
|
|
Re: Steam Era Freight Car - HO Scale
Jim, your description of the coupler itself is a Kadee No 4. Properly housed in a proper pocket, it is, IMHO, a much better
coupler than a No 5, or 58. However, you don't seem to have the pocket it
Jim, your description of the coupler itself is a Kadee No 4. Properly housed in a proper pocket, it is, IMHO, a much better
coupler than a No 5, or 58. However, you don't seem to have the pocket it
|
By
Schuyler Larrabee
·
#40519
·
|
|
Re: Steam Era Freight Car - HO Scale
The "coupler box" is made for the original Mantua loop coupler. It was
suspended from the end sill rect. hole and the screw holding the loop
and hook. The slope in the underframe was to allow the hook
The "coupler box" is made for the original Mantua loop coupler. It was
suspended from the end sill rect. hole and the screw holding the loop
and hook. The slope in the underframe was to allow the hook
|
By
Doug Brown <brown194@...>
·
#40518
·
|