|
Re: Barrett car
It's what amounts to a covered hopper, converted from a tank car by adding slope sheets internally, bottom discharge gates, and hatches on top. Used for hauling roofing gravel. I have a copy of a
It's what amounts to a covered hopper, converted from a tank car by adding slope sheets internally, bottom discharge gates, and hatches on top. Used for hauling roofing gravel. I have a copy of a
|
By
Richard Townsend
·
#45870
·
|
|
Details of Erie 1958 cu ft covered hoppers
Hello everyone,
I'm making a shopping list of detail parts to model a pair of Erie
1958 cu ft covered hoppers, using Bowser 55600 kits as the basis.
From what I can tell, these cars were part of
Hello everyone,
I'm making a shopping list of detail parts to model a pair of Erie
1958 cu ft covered hoppers, using Bowser 55600 kits as the basis.
From what I can tell, these cars were part of
|
By
Mark Heiden
·
#45875
·
|
|
Re: MDC OT tank car frame, was new products (was BLI vs. Walthers ...)
No. As Bruce Smith posted, most were single compartment 8K and 10K gal. cars (the Sunset models were 8K).
The Champ Mid-Continent D-X set is good for the late steam era. Other owners included Gulf
No. As Bruce Smith posted, most were single compartment 8K and 10K gal. cars (the Sunset models were 8K).
The Champ Mid-Continent D-X set is good for the late steam era. Other owners included Gulf
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#45869
·
|
|
Re: NYC modeling
timboconnor@... wrote:
Tim,
Incorrect - The B&A had in total of fourteen 2-6-6-2 Mallets built between 1910 and 1916 by Alco. One was transferred to the NYC&HR in 1911 while the others were
timboconnor@... wrote:
Tim,
Incorrect - The B&A had in total of fourteen 2-6-6-2 Mallets built between 1910 and 1916 by Alco. One was transferred to the NYC&HR in 1911 while the others were
|
By
Tim Gilbert <tgilbert@...>
·
#45868
·
|
|
Re: Naperville Price
Dave,
I think you're to use his PO box with your entry fee. I do beleive
you can pay at the door.
Clark propst
address
and is
of
Dave,
I think you're to use his PO box with your entry fee. I do beleive
you can pay at the door.
Clark propst
address
and is
of
|
By
rockroll50401 <cepropst@...>
·
#45867
·
|
|
Re: MILW 40' combo door PS-1
Hello Mr. McCoy,
From the few photos we have on this MILW series of PS-1s here is a little
more information.
MILW series 29000-29499 is a 500 car order from PS lot 8449. The cars
from 29000 to
Hello Mr. McCoy,
From the few photos we have on this MILW series of PS-1s here is a little
more information.
MILW series 29000-29499 is a 500 car order from PS lot 8449. The cars
from 29000 to
|
By
SamClarke
·
#45866
·
|
|
1944 AAR box car kits for sale
i have three C&BT Shops D&RGW 40' box car kits for sale.
$30 for the lot includes shipping to US address.
Contact me OFF list if interested.
eabracher@...
i have three C&BT Shops D&RGW 40' box car kits for sale.
$30 for the lot includes shipping to US address.
Contact me OFF list if interested.
eabracher@...
|
By
eabracher@...
·
#45880
·
|
|
Re: Barrett car
I've seen another photo somewhere of a Barret tank with two different
size domes. We used to refer to it as the dome and half tank car. I
kitbashed a crude model of it many, many years ago.
I
I've seen another photo somewhere of a Barret tank with two different
size domes. We used to refer to it as the dome and half tank car. I
kitbashed a crude model of it many, many years ago.
I
|
By
Miller, Andrew S. <asmiller@...>
·
#45865
·
|
|
Barrett again
I posted a second picture of the car in question. And the photo was in
fact made in April, 1960.
I posted a second picture of the car in question. And the photo was in
fact made in April, 1960.
|
By
hoghead32 <buckfiveoh@...>
·
#45864
·
|
|
Barrett car
I just posted a picture of a Barrett tankcar taken in 1961. It surely
is an odd duck. This crop of a larger photo is the best I can do at
present. Would anyone out there have any information on this
I just posted a picture of a Barrett tankcar taken in 1961. It surely
is an odd duck. This crop of a larger photo is the best I can do at
present. Would anyone out there have any information on this
|
By
hoghead32 <buckfiveoh@...>
·
#45863
·
|
|
Re: Digest Number 2692
Re:Roller Bearing Models.
As some of you may have noticed, RBM advertized in the last RMC. Speifically
the LHR/CNJ ore cars. I have seen a built up model at Jerry Dziedzic's and it
looks very nice.
Re:Roller Bearing Models.
As some of you may have noticed, RBM advertized in the last RMC. Speifically
the LHR/CNJ ore cars. I have seen a built up model at Jerry Dziedzic's and it
looks very nice.
|
By
Jedalberg
·
#45876
·
|
|
Re: Barrett car
In the Morning Sun book "D&H Steam in Color" two of the Barrett tank/hoppers
for roofing granules can clearly seen in a train going north out of Carbondale
PA.
Chuck Yungkurth
Boulder CO
In the Morning Sun book "D&H Steam in Color" two of the Barrett tank/hoppers
for roofing granules can clearly seen in a train going north out of Carbondale
PA.
Chuck Yungkurth
Boulder CO
|
By
raildata@...
·
#45874
·
|
|
Re: MILW 40' combo door PS-1
Ben, Thanks, I plan to use only the McKean underbody platform sans
bolsters and coupler pockets. It does have 3 longitudinal stringers
on each side which I think is right for the PS-1 which I will
Ben, Thanks, I plan to use only the McKean underbody platform sans
bolsters and coupler pockets. It does have 3 longitudinal stringers
on each side which I think is right for the PS-1 which I will
|
By
Bill McCoy <bugsy451@...>
·
#45860
·
|
|
Re: now NYC
The largest and most active group appears to be the NYC-RR list.
The largest and most active group appears to be the NYC-RR list.
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#45879
·
|
|
Re: now NYC
The largest and most active group appears to be the NYC-RR list.
The largest and most active group appears to be the NYC-RR list.
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#45862
·
|
|
Re: NYC modeling
There's only one possible explanation for the lack of interest
in New York Central freight operations: they didn't own any
articulated steam locomotives! :-)
Tim O.
There's only one possible explanation for the lack of interest
in New York Central freight operations: they didn't own any
articulated steam locomotives! :-)
Tim O.
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#45861
·
|
|
Re: MDC OT tank car frame, was new products (was BLI vs. Walthers ...)
No, the "3 dome" from Sunset is bogus, or represents a miniscule # of cars. You're better off sticking to the single dome "PRR TM8" which is the classic Type 11 I mentioned.
Regards
Bruce
Bruce
No, the "3 dome" from Sunset is bogus, or represents a miniscule # of cars. You're better off sticking to the single dome "PRR TM8" which is the classic Type 11 I mentioned.
Regards
Bruce
Bruce
|
By
Bruce Smith <smithbf@...>
·
#45859
·
|
|
Re: NYC list
Folks;
While Jeff and Terry have certainly done more than their share, and
continue to do so, this is all very strange news. I simply do not
understand how a RR of that size would have so few people
Folks;
While Jeff and Terry have certainly done more than their share, and
continue to do so, this is all very strange news. I simply do not
understand how a RR of that size would have so few people
|
By
Gatwood, Elden <Elden.Gatwood@...>
·
#45857
·
|
|
Re: MDC OT tank car frame, was new products (was BLI vs. Walthers ...)
Dean;
I upgraded a Sunset single-dome "TM8" (Type 11) a while ago. I added
styrene strip as an overlay to the poor-relief tank straps to make them
stand out better; I added brake piping, and I
Dean;
I upgraded a Sunset single-dome "TM8" (Type 11) a while ago. I added
styrene strip as an overlay to the poor-relief tank straps to make them
stand out better; I added brake piping, and I
|
By
Gatwood, Elden <Elden.Gatwood@...>
·
#45856
·
|
|
Re: now NYC
I have received more NYC information, especially from the west end (in particular the Toledo & Ohio Central and Zanesville & Western, and to a lesser extent the Big Four), on the PennsyWest list than
I have received more NYC information, especially from the west end (in particular the Toledo & Ohio Central and Zanesville & Western, and to a lesser extent the Big Four), on the PennsyWest list than
|
By
Mark P.
·
#45855
·
|