main@RealSTMFC.groups.io

Re: Digest Number 3138

No, but there's still ways of getting it off the screen. If it can be seen, it can be downloaded. If this can cause problems for the list, please don't post them in the list archives. It's possible

By James Eckman · #54424 ·

Re: FREIGHT CARS?

As soon as you post something about freight cars. :-) Pete _____________________________________________________ Pete Brown - Gambrills, MD (Near Annapolis) Visit my personal site :

By Pete Brown \(YahooGroups\) <YahooLists@...> · #54422 ·

Re: No full-proof copy protection

Anthony Thompson wrote: Indeed. IMO the current term of copyright is an obscenity. These words that I'm writing are automatically protected under current copyright law for the term of my life plus

By Dave Nelson <muskoka@...> · #54421 ·

Re: Fair use and the sharing of information

Tom Madden wrote: Gosh, now I now know far the series goes <g>. Glad to hear of the cachet, though. Like Richard does with jpegs, sending an individual copy is permitted. Often a

By Anthony Thompson <thompson@...> · #54418 ·

Re: No full-proof copy protection

Pete Brown wrote: You are right about files like MP3. That appeared in the 1998 law. But that law did NOT change the rules for print publications, photographs, art, etc. Incidentally,

By Anthony Thompson <thompson@...> · #54417 ·

Re: Steam Era Videos

Chet, Thank you for the direction to the C&EI/L&N in the period of 1945- 1950 through these films/DVD's. I will immediately seek out the "Green Frog Productions" DVD's. Paul

By Paul Hillman · #54419 ·

Re: No full-proof copy protection

Except that 1 copy for your friend is also typically illegal. You can't share an MP3 with a friend, and I can't use the same copy of Windows for my wife's computer without breaking the law. The most

By Pete Brown \(YahooGroups\) <YahooLists@...> · #54416 ·

Fair use and the sharing of information

Tony Thompson wrote: The internet is certainly the Great Deceiver. Maybe it's the solitude and supposed anonymity, but it can make middle-aged men think teenage girls lust after them, that everything

By pullmanboss <tgmadden@...> · #54415 ·

Re: YS&T tank cars

In a message dated 5/12/2006 4:30:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, smithbf@... writes: On May 12, 2006, at 10:10 AM, SUVCWORR@... wrote: > In the meantime, could someone knowledgeable

By SUVCWORR@... · #54420 ·

Re: YS&T tank cars

Rich, From my memory of those shots, these were both General American built tank cars. At the moment, other then the RC brass model, we have no good models of these cars in HO. I keep hearing

By Bruce Smith · #54414 ·

Steam Era Videos

Group, Yesterday I received 3 DVD's titled "The Golden Twilight of Postwar Steam", parts one, two, and three. They came from Green Frog Productions, which I have no interest in, other than being a

By Chet French <cfrench@...> · #54413 ·

Re: PRR Cabooses

Thanks to Chuck and Bruce for more information. I shall have to cogitate whether to re-do all of the details, as the Max Gray has the [rather crude] K brake cylinder, and I have a pair of archbars

By Justin Kahn · #54412 ·

Re: No full-proof copy protection

Jim Eckman wrote: In principle, you can check on renewals through the LOC but it is not easy. You certainly would not do it for minor matters. Jim raises a very important point: fair

By Anthony Thompson <thompson@...> · #54411 ·

Re: ADMIN: STMFC Photo Policy

Friends, To make sure we don't get into trouble, I have removed the Kraft reefer photo I posted a month or so ago. While I did not see a copyright on the company pamphlet from which this was copied,

By Garth Groff <ggg9y@...> · #54410 ·

Re: USSteel-roads 50' gondolas

All; After a long hiatus working on coastal Mississippi damage (and Everglades restoration)in my new job (24/7), I am back, like the proverbial bad penny. I missed you all! Several folks on this

By Gatwood, Elden J SAD <Elden.J.Gatwood@...> · #54408 ·

ADMIN: Extension of Copyright & the STMFC Discussion

Since Tony Thompson, who's views I specifically asked for regarding copyright issues, was unable to respond yesterday, I am extending the discussion about copyright as it pertains to photo useage on

By Mike Brock <brockm@...> · #54404 ·

Re: ADMIN: STMFC Photo Policy

The old term for patents was 17 years, but patents were not renewable. People are always confusing patents with copyright. Many thanks to Tony Thompson and Bruce Smith for interjecting some "true

By Dennis Storzek <dstorzek@...> · #54403 ·

FREIGHT CARS?

Just curious, when are we going to start talking about FREIGHT CARS again? Bobby Pitts

By bobbypitts44 <bobbypitts44@...> · #54402 ·

Re: No full-proof copy protection

In a message dated 5/12/2006 2:34:35 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ronin_engineer@... writes: Mike, don't feel bad if you can't figure out a way to make our photo archives viewable without

By SUVCWORR@... · #54409 ·

YS&T tank cars

First, I want to apologize for stirring the pot to such an extent. That was never my intention. I did remove the photos when an objection was raised. If there is ever a resolution which allows

By SUVCWORR@... · #54407 ·

Messages