|
Re: ATSF Bx-12 Extended roof painting help....
Charlie,
From a quick glance at the Painting and Lettering Guide, it appears
that your comments on paint colors are quite valid. For the 1946 date,
the printed history, in general, confirms your
Charlie,
From a quick glance at the Painting and Lettering Guide, it appears
that your comments on paint colors are quite valid. For the 1946 date,
the printed history, in general, confirms your
|
By
William Keene <wakeene@...>
·
#56308
·
|
|
ATSF Bx-12 Extended roof painting help....
Am getting close to finishing the Westerfield Bx-12 kit with the
extended roof. Am modeling a boxcar with a lightweight date of 3-46.
Would like to verify what I 'think'is the right color scheme for
Am getting close to finishing the Westerfield Bx-12 kit with the
extended roof. Am modeling a boxcar with a lightweight date of 3-46.
Would like to verify what I 'think'is the right color scheme for
|
By
Charlie Duckworth <trduck@...>
·
#56307
·
|
|
Re: O&W hopper book
Ed Mines wrote:
We rejected the book in the form it then existed, so I know a lot about it. It has a superb history of the evolution of hopper cars, which appears to be the product of
Ed Mines wrote:
We rejected the book in the form it then existed, so I know a lot about it. It has a superb history of the evolution of hopper cars, which appears to be the product of
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#56306
·
|
|
O&W hopper book
Has anyone seen the O&W hopper book?
Does it cover cars from other railroads? Are there a lot of photos?
Ed
Has anyone seen the O&W hopper book?
Does it cover cars from other railroads? Are there a lot of photos?
Ed
|
By
ed_mines
·
#56305
·
|
|
Re: Cudahy reefers?
Kurt, the 1950 ORER shows the number series 6101-6300 with dimensions identical to the other number series. I have two photos of cars in this series which appear to be identical to the earlier Cudahy
Kurt, the 1950 ORER shows the number series 6101-6300 with dimensions identical to the other number series. I have two photos of cars in this series which appear to be identical to the earlier Cudahy
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#56304
·
|
|
Santa Fe USRA Rebuilt Reefers
Based on the photographs in Santa fe Railway rolling stock reference series
volume 2, Refrigerators cars, It appears the USRA rebuild up to RR-34 kept
top operated couplers and RR-35 onward (postwar
Based on the photographs in Santa fe Railway rolling stock reference series
volume 2, Refrigerators cars, It appears the USRA rebuild up to RR-34 kept
top operated couplers and RR-35 onward (postwar
|
By
Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
·
#56303
·
|
|
Email change
I tried sending this note out last night but not all of the lists got
notified, thanks to Yahoo's screening.
Effective immediately, my email address is changed to
jimking3@.... The old
I tried sending this note out last night but not all of the lists got
notified, thanks to Yahoo's screening.
Effective immediately, my email address is changed to
jimking3@.... The old
|
By
Jim King
·
#56302
·
|
|
Re: Cudahy reefers?
Kurt,
Nice work. When I can see straight(tomorrow), I'll look at the data and see how they line up.
Thanks,
Joe Binish
Kurt,
Nice work. When I can see straight(tomorrow), I'll look at the data and see how they line up.
Thanks,
Joe Binish
|
By
joebinish@...
·
#56301
·
|
|
Re: Cudahy reefers?
TIA,
Joe Binish
>
Joe, FWIW, I compiled a table a while back of the 1961 ORER dimensions for various wood reefers pictured in my references compared to the MDC 36 foot meat reefer, the Mehano/AHM(?)
TIA,
Joe Binish
>
Joe, FWIW, I compiled a table a while back of the 1961 ORER dimensions for various wood reefers pictured in my references compared to the MDC 36 foot meat reefer, the Mehano/AHM(?)
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#56300
·
|
|
50's Vehicles
Here's a new list that has nothing to do with freight cars directly, but certainly relates to our period of interest and therefore might be of interest to the group.
To quote:
"50's and older
Here's a new list that has nothing to do with freight cars directly, but certainly relates to our period of interest and therefore might be of interest to the group.
To quote:
"50's and older
|
By
Richard Dermody <ddermody@...>
·
#56299
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Models IC two-bay hopper model
Ed Hawkins wrote:
"Also possibly the D&M (5000-5024), which I've never come across a
good photo to confirm for sure."
Ed, there's a photo of D&M 5003 on page 25 of Henderson's Classic
Freight Cars
Ed Hawkins wrote:
"Also possibly the D&M (5000-5024), which I've never come across a
good photo to confirm for sure."
Ed, there's a photo of D&M 5003 on page 25 of Henderson's Classic
Freight Cars
|
By
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
·
#56298
·
|
|
Re: Cudahy reefers?
Ihave a further question for Dr. H. You mention in the article(I am in the material acquisition phase of modelling one of these cars) that the MDC model is "close to the correct dimensions". Could
Ihave a further question for Dr. H. You mention in the article(I am in the material acquisition phase of modelling one of these cars) that the MDC model is "close to the correct dimensions". Could
|
By
joebinish@...
·
#56297
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Models IC two-bay hopper model - AAR alternate st
The "AAR Alternate Standard" was essentially the Unitcast offset-side
hopper first built for the AMC roads (C&O, NKP, and Erie) in 1934. It was 4
inches lower than the standard design and had
The "AAR Alternate Standard" was essentially the Unitcast offset-side
hopper first built for the AMC roads (C&O, NKP, and Erie) in 1934. It was 4
inches lower than the standard design and had
|
By
James D Thompson <jaydeet@...>
·
#56296
·
|
|
Cudahy reefers?
In the May 93 RMC Richard Hendrickson had an article on making a Cudahy reefer from the MDC 36 foot wood reefer. He mentioned that Cudahy (CRLX) had two series of these cars, 5701-5850 and 5901-6100
In the May 93 RMC Richard Hendrickson had an article on making a Cudahy reefer from the MDC 36 foot wood reefer. He mentioned that Cudahy (CRLX) had two series of these cars, 5701-5850 and 5901-6100
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#56295
·
|
|
Re: Early RP recommendations; was: Prototype for Bachmann "51 ft Mechanical Steel Reefer"?
Thanks Tony. I'll have to get that article and your book.
KL
Thanks Tony. I'll have to get that article and your book.
KL
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#56294
·
|
|
Re: Early RP recommendations; was: Prototype for Bachmann "51 ft Mechanical Steel Reefer"?
Kurt Laughlin wrote:
Kurt, in my article in the January, 1988 RMC I showed my model of a PFE Class R-70-8 made from a Lima body. The Athearn is probably better overall, though it needs work too.
Kurt Laughlin wrote:
Kurt, in my article in the January, 1988 RMC I showed my model of a PFE Class R-70-8 made from a Lima body. The Athearn is probably better overall, though it needs work too.
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#56293
·
|
|
Early RP recommendations; was: Prototype for Bachmann "51 ft Mechanical Steel Reefer"?
>>
"The model has the lower, almost square screen on the left B end
side, and a rectangular louver on the right B side. Is that
correct? If not, I might just junk it and get an Athearn. Louvers
are
>>
"The model has the lower, almost square screen on the left B end
side, and a rectangular louver on the right B side. Is that
correct? If not, I might just junk it and get an Athearn. Louvers
are
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#56292
·
|
|
NP 1937 AAR BOXCAR PAINTING QUESTIONS
Good moring Group,
I am completing the assembly of an IMWX model of a 1937 AAR Northern Pacific boxcar
and have a question regarding what color the underbody and trucks would have been
painted in the
Good moring Group,
I am completing the assembly of an IMWX model of a 1937 AAR Northern Pacific boxcar
and have a question regarding what color the underbody and trucks would have been
painted in the
|
By
billkeene2004 <wakeene@...>
·
#56291
·
|
|
Re: Prototype for Bachmann "51 ft Mechanical Steel Reefer"?
Kurt Laughlin wrote:
"The model has the lower, almost square screen on the left B end
side, and a rectangular louver on the right B side. Is that
correct? If not, I might just junk it and get an
Kurt Laughlin wrote:
"The model has the lower, almost square screen on the left B end
side, and a rectangular louver on the right B side. Is that
correct? If not, I might just junk it and get an
|
By
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
·
#56290
·
|
|
Re: John Golden's insults
Hey Jared,
I don't recall calling Richard and/or Ed "fat", but if
I did I didn't communicate properly. If anything,
we're all fat (with knowledge) because of the hard
work these guys do and the
Hey Jared,
I don't recall calling Richard and/or Ed "fat", but if
I did I didn't communicate properly. If anything,
we're all fat (with knowledge) because of the hard
work these guys do and the
|
By
golden1014
·
#56289
·
|