|
Re: Sheetrock by Rail
I own a house near Akron, Ohio, and the interior was finished in
exactly the same way as Tim descibes below. The house was built in 1943.
Bob Weston
I own a house near Akron, Ohio, and the interior was finished in
exactly the same way as Tim descibes below. The house was built in 1943.
Bob Weston
|
By
Bob Weston
·
#61900
·
|
|
Re: Athearn C&NW 65 ft mill gon
Tim O'Connor writes:
"Maybe they chose to cater to (gasp!) the post-transition era?? After all many
modelers like those 1960's cars (incredible as it may seem!)"
Well, I suppose it might be
Tim O'Connor writes:
"Maybe they chose to cater to (gasp!) the post-transition era?? After all many
modelers like those 1960's cars (incredible as it may seem!)"
Well, I suppose it might be
|
By
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
·
#61899
·
|
|
Re: SP A-50-10 Fifty Foot, OB end door Boxcar
Tony,
Take another look, the A end is sheathed like the sides. There is a 5'-6
1/2" belt rail starting 2'-1" the floor on the sides.This belt rail
extends up a little farther on the A end due to the
Tony,
Take another look, the A end is sheathed like the sides. There is a 5'-6
1/2" belt rail starting 2'-1" the floor on the sides.This belt rail
extends up a little farther on the A end due to the
|
By
Bill Kelly
·
#61898
·
|
|
Re: Sheetrock by Rail
I can say that it was available in at least some form in the 50's.
The dump...err house (which dates to the early 50's not far from the
O&W Kingston branch - gotta get that STMFC connection
I can say that it was available in at least some form in the 50's.
The dump...err house (which dates to the early 50's not far from the
O&W Kingston branch - gotta get that STMFC connection
|
By
tbarney2004
·
#61897
·
|
|
Re: Backdating Mather Proto PH&D
wrote:
Thank you again. I should have written beige and not tan. The
reference is from a 1991 article in RMC that I must have but have not
yet found the right box. I'm finding the RPI site to be
wrote:
Thank you again. I should have written beige and not tan. The
reference is from a 1991 article in RMC that I must have but have not
yet found the right box. I'm finding the RPI site to be
|
By
red_gate_rover
·
#61896
·
|
|
Re: Athearn C&NW 65 ft mill gon
My 10/58 ORER shows two groups of 65'6" mill gons with numbers in the
95000-95199 series and odd numbers in the 132001-132099 series. The
132000 series cars were built by Pressed Steel in 1949 and
My 10/58 ORER shows two groups of 65'6" mill gons with numbers in the
95000-95199 series and odd numbers in the 132001-132099 series. The
132000 series cars were built by Pressed Steel in 1949 and
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#61895
·
|
|
Re: Sheetrock by Rail
After all this prototype information, you may want to build a flatcar loaded
with Sheetrock.
Sunshine offers ATSF Ft L & N bulkhead flatcars and wallboard loads for
them. There is a review of them
After all this prototype information, you may want to build a flatcar loaded
with Sheetrock.
Sunshine offers ATSF Ft L & N bulkhead flatcars and wallboard loads for
them. There is a review of them
|
By
Jim & Lisa Hayes <jimandlisa97225@...>
·
#61894
·
|
|
Re: Backdating Mather Proto PH&D
Hard to say in the absence of photos from the era you model. However,
later photos of the cars all show them to be mineral red. And the RPI
site, though sometimes useful, is far from being a
Hard to say in the absence of photos from the era you model. However,
later photos of the cars all show them to be mineral red. And the RPI
site, though sometimes useful, is far from being a
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#61893
·
|
|
Branchline ATSF BX-69 cars
Branchline is showing a set of four Santa Fe BX69 boxcars. These are
50', riveted, single 8' door cars. The catalog number is 10014. The
photo on the web is of a El Capitan car, but no mention is
Branchline is showing a set of four Santa Fe BX69 boxcars. These are
50', riveted, single 8' door cars. The catalog number is 10014. The
photo on the web is of a El Capitan car, but no mention is
|
By
up4024 <thekays100@...>
·
#61892
·
|
|
Re: Sheetrock by Rail
A search on Wikipedia revealed sheetrock from Plaster City,CA in
1916. Got popular around 1952 with building in the suburbs. From the
postings this seems to be the period some railroads began
A search on Wikipedia revealed sheetrock from Plaster City,CA in
1916. Got popular around 1952 with building in the suburbs. From the
postings this seems to be the period some railroads began
|
By
George Courtney
·
#61891
·
|
|
Re: Sheetrock by Rail
Having been at Rome's house last night, I can vouch for his vintage
sheet rock. My own house, built in 1877, was partially remodeled circa
1926-29 and in those areas the sheet rock has paper labels
Having been at Rome's house last night, I can vouch for his vintage
sheet rock. My own house, built in 1877, was partially remodeled circa
1926-29 and in those areas the sheet rock has paper labels
|
By
Jeff English
·
#61890
·
|
|
Re: Backdating Mather Proto PH&D
wrote:
Thanks for the reply. This information at least allows plausibility
to simply replacing the brakes and data, at least until such time as
pictures surface. For my purposes that's good enough.
wrote:
Thanks for the reply. This information at least allows plausibility
to simply replacing the brakes and data, at least until such time as
pictures surface. For my purposes that's good enough.
|
By
red_gate_rover
·
#61888
·
|
|
Re: "Longitudinal" hopper
I DID say that if it was out of era, that was all I needed to know. <grin>
Dave Smith
--
David L. Smith
Allentown, PA
dlsio4@...
I DID say that if it was out of era, that was all I needed to know. <grin>
Dave Smith
--
David L. Smith
Allentown, PA
dlsio4@...
|
By
David Smith
·
#61889
·
|
|
Re: "Longitudinal" hopper
Might these be just a TAD out of era for this list, Tim?
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
Might these be just a TAD out of era for this list, Tim?
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#61887
·
|
|
Re: "Longitudinal" hopper
It is certainly odd looking. It was evidently a B-L-H idea; I showed the demonstrator car in my volume on SP gondolas. The cars SP bought differ only slightly from the demo. I think part of the
It is certainly odd looking. It was evidently a B-L-H idea; I showed the demonstrator car in my volume on SP gondolas. The cars SP bought differ only slightly from the demo. I think part of the
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#61886
·
|
|
Re: Sheetrock by Rail
Tim O'Connor wrote:
Yes, I think you should, and yes.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510)
Tim O'Connor wrote:
Yes, I think you should, and yes.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510)
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#61884
·
|
|
Re: "Longitudinal" hopper
Richard, that is what I was trying to figure out -- if they were built
before 1961 or not. I agree since I think that they are, I haven't said
anything more about them.
Richard, that is what I was trying to figure out -- if they were built
before 1961 or not. I agree since I think that they are, I haven't said
anything more about them.
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#61883
·
|
|
Re: "Longitudinal" hopper
Uh, guys, not to be a grouch about it, but all these e-mails about cars
built in the 1960s are way out of era for this list.
Richard Hendrickson
Uh, guys, not to be a grouch about it, but all these e-mails about cars
built in the 1960s are way out of era for this list.
Richard Hendrickson
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#61882
·
|
|
Re: Sheetrock by Rail
wrote:
trademark name,
1916 and
Dodge area
mentioned the
three of
Fort Dodge
giant"
Gypsum
wallboard and
with low
gons, as
Dodge had
mined and
The IC built two series of bulkhead flat cars for
wrote:
trademark name,
1916 and
Dodge area
mentioned the
three of
Fort Dodge
giant"
Gypsum
wallboard and
with low
gons, as
Dodge had
mined and
The IC built two series of bulkhead flat cars for
|
By
Chet French <cfrench@...>
·
#61881
·
|
|
Re: "Longitudinal" hopper
Tim,
We are getting way out of scope here. Roofed coal gons, not
hoppers belonged to Big Stone Power. Those covers have been
removed. Motivation was different. The Montana Sub-Bituminous
is very fine
Tim,
We are getting way out of scope here. Roofed coal gons, not
hoppers belonged to Big Stone Power. Those covers have been
removed. Motivation was different. The Montana Sub-Bituminous
is very fine
|
By
Russ Strodtz <sheridan@...>
·
#61885
·
|