|
Re: UP flat car
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#73514
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#73513
·
|
|
Re: C&BT box cars (was 40' Autobox)
--- In STMFC@..., Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
. Here's the complete list as far as I know.
>
> So have at it guys -- fill in the PROTOTYPE blanks.
>
> Tim O'Connor
>
>
--- In STMFC@..., Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
. Here's the complete list as far as I know.
>
> So have at it guys -- fill in the PROTOTYPE blanks.
>
> Tim O'Connor
>
>
|
By
gn3397 <heninger@...>
·
#73512
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
Tim O'Connor wrote:
It is common for museum and archive photos to have "dates" attached to them which are years or even decades wrong, based on evidence right in the photo itself, such as
Tim O'Connor wrote:
It is common for museum and archive photos to have "dates" attached to them which are years or even decades wrong, based on evidence right in the photo itself, such as
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#73511
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
Bob
No. The collection has the photo dated "circa 1870" which is
clearly wrong. I can't make out the date on the flat car but
it looks like an 1890's date. Does anyone know when that depot
in Ogden
Bob
No. The collection has the photo dated "circa 1870" which is
clearly wrong. I can't make out the date on the flat car but
it looks like an 1890's date. Does anyone know when that depot
in Ogden
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#73510
·
|
|
Re: 40' Autobox cars
It depends on what you mean as "pretty accurate". If you use the parts given
to you in the box, you will not get an accurate model. The greatest tragedy
about the C&BT line is while the concept of
It depends on what you mean as "pretty accurate". If you use the parts given
to you in the box, you will not get an accurate model. The greatest tragedy
about the C&BT line is while the concept of
|
By
David North <davenorth@...>
·
#73509
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
I noticed that the shop date on the Union Pacific flat car appears to be Februrary 14,1896. So close, but...
Lars.
________________________________
Sent: Fri 6/20/2008 7:33 PM
To:
I noticed that the shop date on the Union Pacific flat car appears to be Februrary 14,1896. So close, but...
Lars.
________________________________
Sent: Fri 6/20/2008 7:33 PM
To:
|
By
Lars Svanevik <svanevil@...>
·
#73508
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
Would it not be possible that those flat cars would have survived in work train service, and thus
sneak in under the wire, thereby saving Tim from being put on short rations in the Moderator's
Jail
Would it not be possible that those flat cars would have survived in work train service, and thus
sneak in under the wire, thereby saving Tim from being put on short rations in the Moderator's
Jail
|
By
Charlie Vlk
·
#73507
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
Mr. Moderator: Tim O'C should be severely admonished for imposing a photo subject on this august list that is most definitely out of scope. The subject matter is considerably prior to the 1900
Mr. Moderator: Tim O'C should be severely admonished for imposing a photo subject on this august list that is most definitely out of scope. The subject matter is considerably prior to the 1900
|
By
Denny Anspach <danspach@...>
·
#73506
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#73505
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
By
Schuyler Larrabee
·
#73504
·
|
|
Re: 40' Autobox cars
Al Brown wrote:
There was a version of the kit decorated for the B&O class M-59 with the
correct width doors [8' and 6'] included in the kit. I maybe guessing,
but I believe Chris Barkan had some
Al Brown wrote:
There was a version of the kit decorated for the B&O class M-59 with the
correct width doors [8' and 6'] included in the kit. I maybe guessing,
but I believe Chris Barkan had some
|
By
rwitt_2000
·
#73503
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
Tim O'Connor wrote:
http://contentdm.byu.edu/cgi-bin/getimage.exe?CISOROOT=/Savage&CISOPTR=1\
182&DMSCALE=100&DMWIDTH=3600&DMHEIGHT=2600&DMX=0&DMY=0&DMTEXT=&REC=20&DM\
THUMB=1&DMROTATE=0
This
Tim O'Connor wrote:
http://contentdm.byu.edu/cgi-bin/getimage.exe?CISOROOT=/Savage&CISOPTR=1\
182&DMSCALE=100&DMWIDTH=3600&DMHEIGHT=2600&DMX=0&DMY=0&DMTEXT=&REC=20&DM\
THUMB=1&DMROTATE=0
This
|
By
rwitt_2000
·
#73502
·
|
|
Re: 40' Autobox cars
But they sold separate doors, so you could mix & match. Starting with
their model and using their parts, some time back I modelled a B&O
car that had a 14' opening but not four 7' doors -- an 8' main
But they sold separate doors, so you could mix & match. Starting with
their model and using their parts, some time back I modelled a B&O
car that had a 14' opening but not four 7' doors -- an 8' main
|
By
al_brown03
·
#73501
·
|
|
Re: Auto box cars
Ben,Somewhere........I'll start an archeological dig.This may take some
time.Armand Premo
Ben,Somewhere........I'll start an archeological dig.This may take some
time.Armand Premo
|
By
armprem
·
#73499
·
|
|
Re: C&BT box cars (was 40' Autobox)
Columbia & Broad Top
By
Andy Miller <aslmmiller@...>
·
#73500
·
|
|
From the C.R. Savage collection at byu
Anyone have trouble reading the road number on the locomotive?
Paul Catapano
Littlerock Subdivision
Atlantic Inland Railway Co.
"All it takes to start an insane asylum
is a big room and the right
Anyone have trouble reading the road number on the locomotive?
Paul Catapano
Littlerock Subdivision
Atlantic Inland Railway Co.
"All it takes to start an insane asylum
is a big room and the right
|
By
Paul Catapano
·
#73498
·
|
|
Re: 40' Autobox cars
As I remember, owner Dick Schweiger named it for his model railroad, but I don't recall the full name as I left Pittsburgh 14 years ago.
CJ Riley
As I remember, owner Dick Schweiger named it for his model railroad, but I don't recall the full name as I left Pittsburgh 14 years ago.
CJ Riley
|
By
cj riley <cjriley42@...>
·
#73497
·
|
|
Re: UP flat car
Some late "Be Specific" box cars (1956-1957) received UP
reporting marks, while their ownership by OSL or OWR&N was
indicated by a stencil in the upper left hand corner on the
car side. Most (if not
Some late "Be Specific" box cars (1956-1957) received UP
reporting marks, while their ownership by OSL or OWR&N was
indicated by a stencil in the upper left hand corner on the
car side. Most (if not
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#73496
·
|
|
Re: Auto box cars
Good point, Ben. For that number to have turned up in a switch list,
the switch list would have had to date from no earlier than mid-1953,
as the number series is not in the 1/53 ORER (but is in
Good point, Ben. For that number to have turned up in a switch list,
the switch list would have had to date from no earlier than mid-1953,
as the number series is not in the 1/53 ORER (but is in
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#73495
·
|