|
Re: When the X's were added
Actually, a separate corporation in which many railroads owned stock: PRR,
B&O, ACL, L&N, and Southern were among the major RRs that participated.
Unlike PFE, SFRD, ART, and MDT, all of which (as
Actually, a separate corporation in which many railroads owned stock: PRR,
B&O, ACL, L&N, and Southern were among the major RRs that participated.
Unlike PFE, SFRD, ART, and MDT, all of which (as
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#742
·
|
|
Re: When the X's were added
OTOH, Union Refrigerator Transit Line used URTC into the 30s and then
changed to URTX. Could have had something to do with it's purchase by
General American in 1930, but I believe URTC was in use
OTOH, Union Refrigerator Transit Line used URTC into the 30s and then
changed to URTX. Could have had something to do with it's purchase by
General American in 1930, but I believe URTC was in use
|
By
byronrose@...
·
#743
·
|
|
Re: When the X's were added
Richard,
FGEX was a subsidiary of the L&N, ACL, and some other southeastern roads I believe.
Warren
SFRD, IC, NP, BAR, CN & CP reefers were obviously RR owned. ART, PFE,
MDT(&
Richard,
FGEX was a subsidiary of the L&N, ACL, and some other southeastern roads I believe.
Warren
SFRD, IC, NP, BAR, CN & CP reefers were obviously RR owned. ART, PFE,
MDT(&
|
By
ibs4421@...
·
#741
·
|
|
Re: When the X's were added
SFRD, IC, NP, BAR, CN & CP reefers were obviously RR owned. ART, PFE,
MDT(& NRC) were apparently considered to be RR owned, as the companies were
direct subsidiaries of WAB/MP, SP/UP and NYC. But
SFRD, IC, NP, BAR, CN & CP reefers were obviously RR owned. ART, PFE,
MDT(& NRC) were apparently considered to be RR owned, as the companies were
direct subsidiaries of WAB/MP, SP/UP and NYC. But
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#740
·
|
|
Re: When the X's were added
John Nehrich asks:
John, read the message again. PFE and MDT (along with SFRD) already
existed, with non-"X" marks, when this rule went into effect.
PFE at least was definitely considered
John Nehrich asks:
John, read the message again. PFE and MDT (along with SFRD) already
existed, with non-"X" marks, when this rule went into effect.
PFE at least was definitely considered
|
By
thompson@...
·
#739
·
|
|
Re: When the X's were added
Were PFE and MDT considered railroad-owned? Or was it just this wasn't
enforced? (PFE, MDT, and probably a few others that I can't recall
off-hand, were listed in the back of the ORER's in the
Were PFE and MDT considered railroad-owned? Or was it just this wasn't
enforced? (PFE, MDT, and probably a few others that I can't recall
off-hand, were listed in the back of the ORER's in the
|
By
John Nehrich <nehrij@...>
·
#738
·
|
|
Re: Hills Bros photo
In a message dated 2/26/01 7:06:46 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rhendrickson@... writes:
<< Plus, of course, a whole bunch of SP B-50-15s. >>
Richard,
It appears as if the two SP box cars to
In a message dated 2/26/01 7:06:46 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rhendrickson@... writes:
<< Plus, of course, a whole bunch of SP B-50-15s. >>
Richard,
It appears as if the two SP box cars to
|
By
Guy Wilber
·
#737
·
|
|
Re: When the X's were added
In a message dated 2/27/01 7:46:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
tomgloger@... writes:
<< At what point in time did privately owned cars have an
X added to their reporting marks, and when did it
In a message dated 2/27/01 7:46:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
tomgloger@... writes:
<< At what point in time did privately owned cars have an
X added to their reporting marks, and when did it
|
By
Guy Wilber
·
#736
·
|
|
Double sheathed Cotton Belt Boxcars
Someone mentioned these cars recently. I wanted to let people know, especially those in California who are planning to attend the Prototype Modelers Seminars being done by Sunshine Models that ML will
Someone mentioned these cars recently. I wanted to let people know, especially those in California who are planning to attend the Prototype Modelers Seminars being done by Sunshine Models that ML will
|
By
Bill Welch <bwelch@...>
·
#735
·
|
|
New file uploaded to STMFC
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the STMFC
group.
File : /sun.txt
Uploaded by : timoconnor@...
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the STMFC
group.
File : /sun.txt
Uploaded by : timoconnor@...
|
By
STMFC@...
·
#734
·
|
|
When the X's were added
At what point in time did privately owned cars have an
X added to their reporting marks, and when did it become
mandatory?
=====
- Tom Gloger e-mail: mailto:tomgloger@...
web
At what point in time did privately owned cars have an
X added to their reporting marks, and when did it become
mandatory?
=====
- Tom Gloger e-mail: mailto:tomgloger@...
web
|
By
Tom Gloger
·
#733
·
|
|
Re: (many things to save "cyber-postage")
Richard - Check the glossary section for some freight car terms at:
http://www.union.rpi.edu/railroad/images/Glossary/Glossary-A.html
and what you don't see there, let me know and I will try and post
Richard - Check the glossary section for some freight car terms at:
http://www.union.rpi.edu/railroad/images/Glossary/Glossary-A.html
and what you don't see there, let me know and I will try and post
|
By
John Nehrich <nehrij@...>
·
#732
·
|
|
Sunshine models
I do have a Sunshine "catalog" of sorts -- I have a text
file that I have kept up to date with all of the Sunshine
kits, current as well as discontinued kits.
I guess I could post it to the shared
I do have a Sunshine "catalog" of sorts -- I have a text
file that I have kept up to date with all of the Sunshine
kits, current as well as discontinued kits.
I guess I could post it to the shared
|
By
Tim O'Connor <timoconnor@...>
·
#731
·
|
|
Re: (unknown)
Richard Stallworth asked:
"Does Sunshine have a website? Do they produce a catalog?"
Tony Thompson added:
"No, and yes. Write to them at their address shown in many magazine ads (I
don't have it
Richard Stallworth asked:
"Does Sunshine have a website? Do they produce a catalog?"
Tony Thompson added:
"No, and yes. Write to them at their address shown in many magazine ads (I
don't have it
|
By
Benjamin Hom <bhom3@...>
·
#730
·
|
|
Re: (unknown)
Richard Stallworth asked:
No, and yes. Write to them at their address shown in many magazine ads (I
don't have it handy, sorry).
We tend to blame Frank Peacock for sorting all this out. His
Richard Stallworth asked:
No, and yes. Write to them at their address shown in many magazine ads (I
don't have it handy, sorry).
We tend to blame Frank Peacock for sorting all this out. His
|
By
thompson@...
·
#729
·
|
|
(No subject)
Thanks to Richard,Bill and Garth! This is great! For many,many
months I've been thinking the Bowser cars were the end all SAL
roundroof cars. I'm not trashing Bowser. I'm just glad that
Thanks to Richard,Bill and Garth! This is great! For many,many
months I've been thinking the Bowser cars were the end all SAL
roundroof cars. I'm not trashing Bowser. I'm just glad that
|
By
ThisIsR@...
·
#728
·
|
|
Re: Hills Bros photo
Note also the Utah Coal Route GS gondola directly behind the SP (ex-EP&SW)
gondola and, directly above the lamp post, a 36' Delaware & Hudson wood box
car. Plus, of course, a whole bunch of SP
Note also the Utah Coal Route GS gondola directly behind the SP (ex-EP&SW)
gondola and, directly above the lamp post, a 36' Delaware & Hudson wood box
car. Plus, of course, a whole bunch of SP
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#727
·
|
|
Re: Hills Bros photo
Jon Miller said:
Jon, these photos are in the UC Berkeley library. You could contact them
about prints; and there are MANY more from that period. Just the ones from
the 1934 strike contain many RR
Jon Miller said:
Jon, these photos are in the UC Berkeley library. You could contact them
about prints; and there are MANY more from that period. Just the ones from
the 1934 strike contain many RR
|
By
thompson@...
·
#726
·
|
|
Re: Hills Bros photo
Thanks Tony,
I finally got there. Nice ATSF auto box (Fe-Q maybe) in the background
also. Picture has note of #67 and that is the picture number. Would sure
like to have these pictures in 8x10
Thanks Tony,
I finally got there. Nice ATSF auto box (Fe-Q maybe) in the background
also. Picture has note of #67 and that is the picture number. Would sure
like to have these pictures in 8x10
|
By
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
·
#725
·
|
|
Re: Hills Bros photo
Jon,
Try this URL: http://www.oac.cdlib.org:80/dynaweb/ead/calher/strike/ .
Then click on container list on the menu at left. When the new window
opens at right, scroll down to #67. Finally, click on
Jon,
Try this URL: http://www.oac.cdlib.org:80/dynaweb/ead/calher/strike/ .
Then click on container list on the menu at left. When the new window
opens at right, scroll down to #67. Finally, click on
|
By
Garth G. Groff <ggg9y@...>
·
#724
·
|