|
Re: Brakes
Clark Propst <cepropst@...> wrote:
This is getting out of the Stream Era, but ABD came along in
the early 60s I think, then ABDW around the mid-70s or so. Jim
Eager could probably get
Clark Propst <cepropst@...> wrote:
This is getting out of the Stream Era, but ABD came along in
the early 60s I think, then ABDW around the mid-70s or so. Jim
Eager could probably get
|
By
Jeff English
·
#7514
·
|
|
Re: Freight Cars in Museums
In the slightly further north, west, try the West Coast Railway Assoc museum
in Squamish (just north of Vancouver, B.C.) An on-line tour can be had at
http://www.wcra.org/collection/freight.htm
Rob
In the slightly further north, west, try the West Coast Railway Assoc museum
in Squamish (just north of Vancouver, B.C.) An on-line tour can be had at
http://www.wcra.org/collection/freight.htm
Rob
|
By
Robert Kirkham <rdkirkham@...>
·
#7513
·
|
|
Re: informal prototype modelers gathering review
presentation on brass etching
Mike Wotnoski is his name, He makes some excellent brass etchings of details
like railroad specific cast iron railings, cast signs like yard limit signs,
signal parts,
presentation on brass etching
Mike Wotnoski is his name, He makes some excellent brass etchings of details
like railroad specific cast iron railings, cast signs like yard limit signs,
signal parts,
|
By
Ned Carey <westernmd@...>
·
#7487
·
|
|
Re: New Orleans Public Belt, Circa ?
75000 - 75699 AC&F 1912
75700 - 76199 Haskell and Barker 1912
76200 - 77199 AC&F 1916
77200 - 78119 AC&F 1917
Car in photo sure looks like 78138.
Chet French
75000 - 75699 AC&F 1912
75700 - 76199 Haskell and Barker 1912
76200 - 77199 AC&F 1916
77200 - 78119 AC&F 1917
Car in photo sure looks like 78138.
Chet French
|
By
cef39us <cfrench@...>
·
#7512
·
|
|
Re: C&O 1949 Roster
Bob - Why certainly you can pay us to visit! Seriously, we welcome visitors
on a pre-arranged basis. If we're busy we'll put you off. If not, we'll
set a date and time. We normally have only
Bob - Why certainly you can pay us to visit! Seriously, we welcome visitors
on a pre-arranged basis. If we're busy we'll put you off. If not, we'll
set a date and time. We normally have only
|
By
Al & Patricia Westerfield <westerfield@...>
·
#7511
·
|
|
Re: New Orleans Public Belt, Circa ?
--- James D Thompson <jaydeet@...> wrote:
The Wabash had 3200 36' Fowlers, 75000-78199.
Ted
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess,
--- James D Thompson <jaydeet@...> wrote:
The Wabash had 3200 36' Fowlers, 75000-78199.
Ted
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess,
|
By
Ted Culotta <ted_culotta@...>
·
#7510
·
|
|
Re: Brakes
Thanks, Jeff and all.
Has there been any or many changes to the AB system over the years?
Clark
Jeff English wrote:
Thanks, Jeff and all.
Has there been any or many changes to the AB system over the years?
Clark
Jeff English wrote:
|
By
Clark Propst <cepropst@...>
·
#7509
·
|
|
Thanks RER Lookups/Helium Tank Cars
Thanks to all the folks who responded to my plea for lookups from
RERs. A good bit of data has been cataloged and more is on the way. A
great resource this list is (wish we had Internet ten years
Thanks to all the folks who responded to my plea for lookups from
RERs. A good bit of data has been cataloged and more is on the way. A
great resource this list is (wish we had Internet ten years
|
By
Jay H. Miller <jay@...>
·
#7507
·
|
|
Re: New Orleans Public Belt, Circa ?
After punching the send button, I realized that there was an error in my
post regarding the Wabash box car in the NOPB Ry photo. Those cars wre
36'5" IL, not 40'.
Richard H. Hendrickson
Ashland,
After punching the send button, I realized that there was an error in my
post regarding the Wabash box car in the NOPB Ry photo. Those cars wre
36'5" IL, not 40'.
Richard H. Hendrickson
Ashland,
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#7506
·
|
|
Re: New Orleans Public Belt, Circa ?
C'mon, Shawn, surely you know that USRA box cars had 5-5-5 corrugated steel
ends. In fact, the CMStP&P box car behind the switcher IS a USRA single
sheathed box, of which the Milwaukee owned more
C'mon, Shawn, surely you know that USRA box cars had 5-5-5 corrugated steel
ends. In fact, the CMStP&P box car behind the switcher IS a USRA single
sheathed box, of which the Milwaukee owned more
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#7505
·
|
|
Re: Freight Cars in Museums
Try www.mcrwy.com/ for images of many of Midcontinents holdings
Try www.mcrwy.com/ for images of many of Midcontinents holdings
|
By
johncb505 <johncb@...>
·
#7504
·
|
|
Re: New Orleans Public Belt, Circa ?
side of
David is correct, the car had a 36'-5" IL. The car is from the
77200 - 78199 series built by AC&F in 1917. Cars were described as
having z bar or steel ends and Hutchins or radial roofs.
side of
David is correct, the car had a 36'-5" IL. The car is from the
77200 - 78199 series built by AC&F in 1917. Cars were described as
having z bar or steel ends and Hutchins or radial roofs.
|
By
cef39us <cfrench@...>
·
#7503
·
|
|
Re: Freight Cars in Museums
If anyone will send me the info, I'll make a page and
post it on the Steam Era Freight Cars web site. I
will need to know the location of the car or museum
(if it's in a museum) and what type of car
If anyone will send me the info, I'll make a page and
post it on the Steam Era Freight Cars web site. I
will need to know the location of the car or museum
(if it's in a museum) and what type of car
|
By
Ted Culotta <ted_culotta@...>
·
#7502
·
|
|
New Orleans Public Belt, Circa ?
Nope, the ends are wrong and it only has two diagonals on either side of
the door. If the number is 78138, it's a 36-ft car anyway.
David Thompson, that Milwaukee car is a USRA...
Nope, the ends are wrong and it only has two diagonals on either side of
the door. If the number is 78138, it's a 36-ft car anyway.
David Thompson, that Milwaukee car is a USRA...
|
By
James D Thompson <jaydeet@...>
·
#7501
·
|
|
New Orleans Public Belt, Circa ?
List,
You might enjoy this shot of the NOPB Rwy sometime
in the 1920's-1930's. The URL will most likely wrap
around, but it's worth typing out. Other than the
Wabash car in the foreground (honest!),
List,
You might enjoy this shot of the NOPB Rwy sometime
in the 1920's-1930's. The URL will most likely wrap
around, but it's worth typing out. Other than the
Wabash car in the foreground (honest!),
|
By
Shawn Beckert
·
#7500
·
|
|
Re: IC 30500-31999 questions
Tim When I put out that information regards the IC boxcars I was looking for
confirmation about the series of cars in general since branchline was coming
out with post war cars. The information was
Tim When I put out that information regards the IC boxcars I was looking for
confirmation about the series of cars in general since branchline was coming
out with post war cars. The information was
|
By
ICRR9@...
·
#7508
·
|
|
Re: Why clean tank cars?
Dave,
All of what was put in the car would not always come out. Corn sweetener
comes to mind. Molasses?
Clark
David Soderblom wrote:
Dave,
All of what was put in the car would not always come out. Corn sweetener
comes to mind. Molasses?
Clark
David Soderblom wrote:
|
By
Clark Propst <cepropst@...>
·
#7499
·
|
|
Western Informal Prototype Modelers Gathering
All,
Please pardon me for using my work e-mail to make this post.
I'm glad to hear that Bill's informal meet went well. Several of us from the
STMFC list have been talking of-line about doing a
All,
Please pardon me for using my work e-mail to make this post.
I'm glad to hear that Bill's informal meet went well. Several of us from the
STMFC list have been talking of-line about doing a
|
By
Golden John D Maj CFACC/C3 AME TALCE Manager <John.golden@...>
·
#7498
·
|
|
Re: Outlaw date for friction bearings and arch bar trucks
Guy Wilber writes:
I've been citing July, 1941 as the cutoff date for so many years I now
can't remember where I got that information. But your documentation seems
conclusive that 1/40 is the
Guy Wilber writes:
I've been citing July, 1941 as the cutoff date for so many years I now
can't remember where I got that information. But your documentation seems
conclusive that 1/40 is the
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#7495
·
|
|
Re: Brakes
I was surprised that the discussion of the differences between
K and AB brakes did not also point out that the AB's mechanical
design and construction was vastly superior to the K brake.
The K
I was surprised that the discussion of the differences between
K and AB brakes did not also point out that the AB's mechanical
design and construction was vastly superior to the K brake.
The K
|
By
Jeff English
·
#7496
·
|