Bill - I have a list of the NP scheme changes at: http://www.union.rpi.edu/railroad/images/rolling-stock/Paint/Paint-N.html as best I can find the information (mostly from Todd Sullivan's NP

All, For a variety of reasons, I was unable to attend either of Sunshine Models' seminars here in California. There was one in Southern California on the 4th, and one in Northern California on the

A Will Whittaker photo of NP double sheathed boxcar 12855 photographed in March 1954, with a reweigh date of 10-52, shows the car with the larger Monad or yin/yang symbol and "Main Street of the

After my minor diatribe t'other day, I decided to review some of the other answers given to friend Richard (Stallworth) and felt the urge to go above and beyond. To wit: This is kind of a cop out

Dear Larry, Your idea is great. You could probably guarantee a manufacturer that each of the 200 or so people on this list would buy ten underframes. But how could they cover the other 48,000 or so

3-9-01 My comments about UTLX car frames was simply throwing an idea out there for consideration.I had always thought there was general standardisation of the X-3 underframe in the UTLX fleet. If

Larry, Sometime ago I measured three UTLX tankcars built prior to WWII. One was a 100,000lb (10,036 gal) capacity insulated car built 8-14-1920. The second insulated car was 10,032 gal and built

3-5-01 This is a revision of a note I sent to John Nerich's NYB&W website. The discussion by Richard Hendrikson about the need for UTLX tank cars prompts me to repeat it: Why couldn't one of the

I would be glad to post any such lists, either as scanned in jpeg files or text files, on the rpi site for all to share. - John

Larry, I believe that this is what is coming from Sunshine Models, although it will be a complete kit that includes an Intermountain tank. Apparently the holdup is getting someone to etch the brass

Jeff - Years ago I brought a portable copier into the ACF archives at St. Charles and copied the lot list up through about 1955. I've made copies of the list at cost for about half a dozen persons.

Gosh Byron, I ain't mad at ya! In fact, in answering Richard's questions, you answered some I had not thought to ask, thanks. Warren Dickinson

Hello Richard, Since nobody seems to have answered all of your questions, I thought I'd take it upon myself to do so and get everybody good and mad at me. Here goes: On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 12:56:44

From time to time several contributors to this list will quote citations from a Lot List for one or more of the historical car builders. My question is how does one go about acquiring one's own

Guy Wilber writes: somewhat. not ancient in SP Guy, looking at the number again, there is not much doubt that it is 51215. The only questionable number might be the "2" but Fraley did his "7" with

In a message dated 3/8/01 10:20:14 AM Pacific Standard Time, guycwilber@... writes: << may have wondered somewhat. >> They wandered and we wondered. Guy

Mike listed the following cars from his UP conductors' book: <<4. Southern Pacific 58403 WB F.Oil 3-17-49>> This would be an 0-50-12 proving that the SP cars may have wondered somewhat. <<10.

I believe Martin's plan is to include tanks as a part of the kit. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** Bill 'Welch <bwelch@...> Associate Minister, Unitarian Universalist Congregation of

Would the IM tank come with the kit or be purchased separately? Dave Nelson