|
Re: Morning Sun tank car book?
I think Jim Kinkaid is working on two tank car books for Morning Sun. They are due next year.
Scott Chatfield
I think Jim Kinkaid is working on two tank car books for Morning Sun. They are due next year.
Scott Chatfield
|
By
D. Scott Chatfield
·
#84355
·
|
|
Re: B&O P31 Flats
trucks
prototype
if
Yes, it is clear from the photos on the Elwood site that the trucks were
70-ton spring plank trucks.
FB 9432 <http://gelwood.railfan.net/bo/bo9432akg.jpg> - Newark NJ -
08/07/83
trucks
prototype
if
Yes, it is clear from the photos on the Elwood site that the trucks were
70-ton spring plank trucks.
FB 9432 <http://gelwood.railfan.net/bo/bo9432akg.jpg> - Newark NJ -
08/07/83
|
By
rwitt_2000
·
#84354
·
|
|
Re: Rock Island box car?
wrote:
The press steel bracing show signs of repairs where they trapped water
and it received A-B scheduled brakes, but without any paint or
stenciling visible the owner remains a mystery. If the
wrote:
The press steel bracing show signs of repairs where they trapped water
and it received A-B scheduled brakes, but without any paint or
stenciling visible the owner remains a mystery. If the
|
By
rwitt_2000
·
#84353
·
|
|
Re: Rock Island box car? - How about C&NW?
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> wrote: But it turns out I have a Soph Marty photo of an identical C&NW car
>
As a pitch, Mike Moore will be showing some of Soph's
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> wrote: But it turns out I have a Soph Marty photo of an identical C&NW car
>
As a pitch, Mike Moore will be showing some of Soph's
|
By
rockroll50401 <cepropst@...>
·
#84352
·
|
|
Re: C&O "For Progress"
Tim,
Thanks for the insight. Do you have any idea about the yellow on red car versus the white on red car?
Thanks,
Matt Forsyth
Modeling the D&H Penn Division/
Erie Jefferson Division in
"O"
Tim,
Thanks for the insight. Do you have any idea about the yellow on red car versus the white on red car?
Thanks,
Matt Forsyth
Modeling the D&H Penn Division/
Erie Jefferson Division in
"O"
|
By
mforsyth127
·
#84351
·
|
|
Re: C&O "For Progress"
The "For Progress" slogan was applied from early 1948 on.
The "For Progress" slogan was applied from early 1948 on.
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#84350
·
|
|
Re: Intermountain 8K Tank Cars
The good news is that both the Canton Tank Car Co. and Globe Oil cars
are based on prototype photos. The bad news is that both companies
were absorbed by others well before 1953 so the prototypes
The good news is that both the Canton Tank Car Co. and Globe Oil cars
are based on prototype photos. The bad news is that both companies
were absorbed by others well before 1953 so the prototypes
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#84349
·
|
|
Re: C&O "For Progress"
Group (and C&O Mavens in particular)
Can anyone advise as to when the C&O first started lettering box cars with the "For Progress" slogan, and in addition, when they started using that slogan on
Group (and C&O Mavens in particular)
Can anyone advise as to when the C&O first started lettering box cars with the "For Progress" slogan, and in addition, when they started using that slogan on
|
By
mforsyth127
·
#84348
·
|
|
Intermountain 8K Tank Cars
IM lists an 8K tank car stencilled for Canton Tank Car Co and another for Globe Oil.
Are there prototypes for these models and while I gather Globe Oil was an oil producer or distributor, what did
IM lists an 8K tank car stencilled for Canton Tank Car Co and another for Globe Oil.
Are there prototypes for these models and while I gather Globe Oil was an oil producer or distributor, what did
|
By
atsfsd26 <davenorth@...>
·
#84347
·
|
|
Re: Rock Island box car? - How about C&NW?
Rob, I'm sure you are correct. I hadn't considered the C&NW cars
because they were not as tall as the USRA cars, and the proportion of
length to width is hard to judge in the photo. But it turns
Rob, I'm sure you are correct. I hadn't considered the C&NW cars
because they were not as tall as the USRA cars, and the proportion of
length to width is hard to judge in the photo. But it turns
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#84346
·
|
|
B&O P31 Flats
I picked up one of the new models. I understand the deck issues. What trucks
were these cars fitted with when built. The B&O Modeler has one prototype
photo of a P-25a and it has 70 ton spring plank
I picked up one of the new models. I understand the deck issues. What trucks
were these cars fitted with when built. The B&O Modeler has one prototype
photo of a P-25a and it has 70 ton spring plank
|
By
Brian Carlson <brian@...>
·
#84345
·
|
|
Re: DL&W 53000-53259
Thanks Rich:
Do you have any photos of these cars. Unfortunately I don't know how to
take the technical (Correct) side frame designation and convert it to the
terms I know like ASF Ride Control,
Thanks Rich:
Do you have any photos of these cars. Unfortunately I don't know how to
take the technical (Correct) side frame designation and convert it to the
terms I know like ASF Ride Control,
|
By
Brian Carlson <brian@...>
·
#84344
·
|
|
Re: Rock Island box car? - How about C&NW?
Tim;
I'd wager that it is a former C&NW car built in the 1920's. See Jeff Koeller's article on p. 42 of the September 2003 issue of Mainline Modeler. I believe that Sunshine has produced a kit for
Tim;
I'd wager that it is a former C&NW car built in the 1920's. See Jeff Koeller's article on p. 42 of the September 2003 issue of Mainline Modeler. I believe that Sunshine has produced a kit for
|
By
Rob Adams
·
#84343
·
|
|
Re: Rock Island box car?
The design is USRA 50 ton single sheathed. Definitely not Rock
Island, which owned no such box cars. And definitely not built for
the USRA, as the ends are 7/8 corrugated, not 5/5/5. I'm not
The design is USRA 50 ton single sheathed. Definitely not Rock
Island, which owned no such box cars. And definitely not built for
the USRA, as the ends are 7/8 corrugated, not 5/5/5. I'm not
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#84342
·
|
|
Re: Prototype accuracy: a mfr's viewpoint
Jim King notes:
"Second, as for collecting info to make kits or RTR "right", this is all a
matter of economics for the manufacturer. There are at least 2 very basic
differences between resin kit
Jim King notes:
"Second, as for collecting info to make kits or RTR "right", this is all a
matter of economics for the manufacturer. There are at least 2 very basic
differences between resin kit
|
By
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
·
#84341
·
|
|
Re: Prototype accuracy: a mfr's viewpoint
Steve Kay wrote:
Well said, Steve. My preferences, enjoyments and approach are essentially the same.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley,
Steve Kay wrote:
Well said, Steve. My preferences, enjoyments and approach are essentially the same.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley,
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#84340
·
|
|
Re: Prototype accuracy: a mfr's viewpoint
First of all, thanks for the insights. It is easy for us modelers to get a totally wrong idea on how things work, since we just see the finished products and not all of the design and research that
First of all, thanks for the insights. It is easy for us modelers to get a totally wrong idea on how things work, since we just see the finished products and not all of the design and research that
|
By
StephenK
·
#84339
·
|
|
Re: Rock Island box car?
USRA S/S, no? With newer trucks and AB brakes.
Walt Lankenau
USRA S/S, no? With newer trucks and AB brakes.
Walt Lankenau
|
By
mcindoefalls
·
#84338
·
|
|
Rock Island box car?
The Ebay seller says this is a Rock Island box car. Anyone
recognize it?
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c248/myoungwisc/May%20Slides/riBracedBoxcar_unk_unk_stamped.jpg
Tim O
The Ebay seller says this is a Rock Island box car. Anyone
recognize it?
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c248/myoungwisc/May%20Slides/riBracedBoxcar_unk_unk_stamped.jpg
Tim O
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#84337
·
|
|
Re: Prototype info from model mfgs
Bill, glad to see you took no offense at my comments.
And I appreciate your in-depth look at the manufacturing side. Many of us modelers have very little knowledge of what is involved
in seeing our
Bill, glad to see you took no offense at my comments.
And I appreciate your in-depth look at the manufacturing side. Many of us modelers have very little knowledge of what is involved
in seeing our
|
By
Douglas Harding <dharding@...>
·
#84336
·
|