|
Re: 60-foot flat cars
Rock Island 93000 - 93048 were built by the RI in 1956 and were fishbelly
sides. They had 17 stake pockets with one in the center. There were McLean
Fogg strap anchors between the stake pockets.
Rock Island 93000 - 93048 were built by the RI in 1956 and were fishbelly
sides. They had 17 stake pockets with one in the center. There were McLean
Fogg strap anchors between the stake pockets.
|
By
Steve and Barb Hile
·
#89260
·
|
|
Re: 60-foot flat cars
Richard Townsendt wrote:
Rich, the SP cars (Class F-70-3, built in 1942) did indeed have fishbelly sides. I used photos of these cars in my Vol. 3 on SP freight cars, and can send you scans
Richard Townsendt wrote:
Rich, the SP cars (Class F-70-3, built in 1942) did indeed have fishbelly sides. I used photos of these cars in my Vol. 3 on SP freight cars, and can send you scans
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#89259
·
|
|
Re: 1934 and 1936 ORER Help
Rupert Gamlen wrote:
I know this well and have in fact have "visited" these issues; but they no longer do or permit copying from these rather fragile volumes. Luckily the Xerox copies Kyle Wyatt
Rupert Gamlen wrote:
I know this well and have in fact have "visited" these issues; but they no longer do or permit copying from these rather fragile volumes. Luckily the Xerox copies Kyle Wyatt
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#89258
·
|
|
Re: 60-foot flat cars
Rich, the Santa Fe 90900-91191 series were Ft-T and Ft-U class cars
with fishbelly side and center sills and 70 tons nominal capacity
built by General American in 1940-1941. The two classes were
Rich, the Santa Fe 90900-91191 series were Ft-T and Ft-U class cars
with fishbelly side and center sills and 70 tons nominal capacity
built by General American in 1940-1941. The two classes were
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#89257
·
|
|
Re: 60-foot flat cars
There's a photo of MILW 49042 in MM 5/99, p 39. It's a Pullman PS-4, and indeed has fishbelly side sills.
There's a photo of SP 79825 in TS CYC 17, p 197 (from the '43 CBC). This car, too, has
There's a photo of MILW 49042 in MM 5/99, p 39. It's a Pullman PS-4, and indeed has fishbelly side sills.
There's a photo of SP 79825 in TS CYC 17, p 197 (from the '43 CBC). This car, too, has
|
By
al_brown03
·
#89256
·
|
|
60-foot flat cars
I'm looking to model a 60-foot flat car with fishbelly sides. Can anyone tell whether any of the following 60-footers from the Jan 59 ORER have such sides, and if there might be photos of any of them
I'm looking to model a 60-foot flat car with fishbelly sides. Can anyone tell whether any of the following 60-footers from the Jan 59 ORER have such sides, and if there might be photos of any of them
|
By
Richard Townsend
·
#89255
·
|
|
Re: 1934 and 1936 ORER Help
Tony
The Green Library of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, has a large collection of early issues, the earliest being under the original title of Sechrist's Hand Book and Railway
Tony
The Green Library of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, has a large collection of early issues, the earliest being under the original title of Sechrist's Hand Book and Railway
|
By
Rupert & Maureen <gamlenz@...>
·
#89254
·
|
|
Re: Train Schedules and the USRA
While I so very respectfully disagree with some of Al Westerfield's points in his posting regarding rail labour, he did a very good job of outlining the problems US railroads faced in WWI.
Canadian
While I so very respectfully disagree with some of Al Westerfield's points in his posting regarding rail labour, he did a very good job of outlining the problems US railroads faced in WWI.
Canadian
|
By
railwayman <stevelucas3@...>
·
#89253
·
|
|
Re: Cleaning Stock Cars (was Weathering Chalk)
Steve, are the capacities listed on the site based on weight, volume, or common practice incorporating a bit of both? (Conceivably an animal load could "cube out" because they can't be packed as
Steve, are the capacities listed on the site based on weight, volume, or common practice incorporating a bit of both? (Conceivably an animal load could "cube out" because they can't be packed as
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#89266
·
|
|
Re: Train Schedules and the USRA
The comments my message generated have been interesting and at times amusing, but except for a couple of points, I don't think I saw an answer to the question "Was this lack of regular schedules the
The comments my message generated have been interesting and at times amusing, but except for a couple of points, I don't think I saw an answer to the question "Was this lack of regular schedules the
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#89252
·
|
|
Re: 1934 and 1936 ORER Help
bob_karig wrote:
Since it began in 1885, that's about as far back as is possible <g>.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
bob_karig wrote:
Since it began in 1885, that's about as far back as is possible <g>.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#89251
·
|
|
Re: 1934 and 1936 ORER Help
Chuck Yungkurth wrote:
Going back how early, Chuck? I'd sure like to find more 19th century issues available somewhere convenient.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley,
Chuck Yungkurth wrote:
Going back how early, Chuck? I'd sure like to find more 19th century issues available somewhere convenient.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley,
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#89250
·
|
|
Re: Train Schedules and the USRA
Tim O'Connor wrote:
Two different retired PFE people told me, in separate interviews on different dates, that their avoidance of PRR for perishables arose from PRR's damage claims, which they
Tim O'Connor wrote:
Two different retired PFE people told me, in separate interviews on different dates, that their avoidance of PRR for perishables arose from PRR's damage claims, which they
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#89249
·
|
|
Re: 1934 and 1936 ORER Help
I have a copy of the May, 1934 ORER, but have never been able to locate one from 1936. I can make a few copies if desired.
A.T. Kott
I have a copy of the May, 1934 ORER, but have never been able to locate one from 1936. I can make a few copies if desired.
A.T. Kott
|
By
proto48er
·
#89248
·
|
|
Re: 1934 and 1936 ORER Help
There's a complete set of ORERs, month by month going back to at least 1886, on microfiche at the Science, Industry & Business Library (SIBL) of the New York Public Library. SIBL is located at the
There's a complete set of ORERs, month by month going back to at least 1886, on microfiche at the Science, Industry & Business Library (SIBL) of the New York Public Library. SIBL is located at the
|
By
bob_karig <karig@...>
·
#89247
·
|
|
Re: Styron
While it may be a broad or incorrect use of the term "resin", the plastic plant where my mother worked (Sinclair-Koppers, makers of Dylite, a competitor to Styrofoam) used to - and perhaps still does
While it may be a broad or incorrect use of the term "resin", the plastic plant where my mother worked (Sinclair-Koppers, makers of Dylite, a competitor to Styrofoam) used to - and perhaps still does
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#89265
·
|
|
Re: 1934 and 1936 ORER Help
The Library at the Colorado Railroad Museum has one issue of the ORER for each year published. They will copy pages for 30 cents each plus postage.
Also have bound back issues of MR, RMC, Railway
The Library at the Colorado Railroad Museum has one issue of the ORER for each year published. They will copy pages for 30 cents each plus postage.
Also have bound back issues of MR, RMC, Railway
|
By
drgwrail
·
#89246
·
|
|
Re: Styron
Since this thread has finally drifted toward Bakelite, I would like to know more about rail shipment of the ingredients and products. Bakelite is a trade name for a thermosetting phenolic resin, as
Since this thread has finally drifted toward Bakelite, I would like to know more about rail shipment of the ingredients and products. Bakelite is a trade name for a thermosetting phenolic resin, as
|
By
LOUIS WHITELEY <octoraro1@...>
·
#89245
·
|
|
Re: Styron
Elden,
It turns out Eastman Chemical still makes the stuff:
http://www.eastman.com/Brands/piccolastic/Pages/Overview.aspx
We need a bit of discussion about the term resin, a generic term that
Elden,
It turns out Eastman Chemical still makes the stuff:
http://www.eastman.com/Brands/piccolastic/Pages/Overview.aspx
We need a bit of discussion about the term resin, a generic term that
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#89244
·
|
|
Re: Styron
That's likely because fiberboard drums were seldom seen outside, since they didn't hold up any better in the rain than cardboard boxes did.
As to size, anything was possible, from short little ones
That's likely because fiberboard drums were seldom seen outside, since they didn't hold up any better in the rain than cardboard boxes did.
As to size, anything was possible, from short little ones
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#89243
·
|