|
Re: Box/auto distribution 1938
Tim O'Conner writes: I think it's worth some digging down and trying to find out WHY SP box cars were so much more common on the
UP than random distribution would predict.
Uhh, Tim have you looked at
Tim O'Conner writes: I think it's worth some digging down and trying to find out WHY SP box cars were so much more common on the
UP than random distribution would predict.
Uhh, Tim have you looked at
|
By
Douglas Harding <dharding@...>
·
#89772
·
|
|
Re: CGW 1934 X29
Ron, are you modeling the CGW where you would need several of these car or do you just want one of two?
If you needed 10 or 12 of them then, yes, I'd go for typical. If you only want 1 or 2 then I'd
Ron, are you modeling the CGW where you would need several of these car or do you just want one of two?
If you needed 10 or 12 of them then, yes, I'd go for typical. If you only want 1 or 2 then I'd
|
By
Clark Propst
·
#89771
·
|
|
Re: Milling in Transit
Jeff;
I don't know if it was common, but I have seen an awful lot of cars with
powdered flour all over them, like a powdered doughnut almost. I once asked a
guy that worked in a bakery (a BIG one),
Jeff;
I don't know if it was common, but I have seen an awful lot of cars with
powdered flour all over them, like a powdered doughnut almost. I once asked a
guy that worked in a bakery (a BIG one),
|
By
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
·
#89770
·
|
|
Re: Box/auto distribution 1938
Mike, Tim O'connor wrote this, not me. You'll have to ask him where it comes from.
Larry Ostresh
Laramie, Wyoming
Mike, Tim O'connor wrote this, not me. You'll have to ask him where it comes from.
Larry Ostresh
Laramie, Wyoming
|
By
Wendye Ware
·
#89769
·
|
|
Re: Freight car Distribution
Paul--
I'm afraid that this may turn into a tangential discussion, but here we go.
Yard limits were an operating rules provision only, applying to main track per operating Rule 93. Definition from
Paul--
I'm afraid that this may turn into a tangential discussion, but here we go.
Yard limits were an operating rules provision only, applying to main track per operating Rule 93. Definition from
|
By
Steve Lucas <stevelucas3@...>
·
#89768
·
|
|
Re: Box/auto distribution 1938
Mike, the data Mark gave me is not a conductor book. It is a listing of the passenger and freight trains that passed Sherman on June 4 and 5, 1949. Their were 16 EB and 15 WB on the 4th, 17 EB and
Mike, the data Mark gave me is not a conductor book. It is a listing of the passenger and freight trains that passed Sherman on June 4 and 5, 1949. Their were 16 EB and 15 WB on the 4th, 17 EB and
|
By
Wendye Ware
·
#89767
·
|
|
Re: Box/auto distribution 1938
Tim, why don't you just look at the 1951 book yourself and tell us what you find? Scanned pages and an Excel transcription are online at www.laramiedepot.org
Why are the 1938 books
Tim, why don't you just look at the 1951 book yourself and tell us what you find? Scanned pages and an Excel transcription are online at www.laramiedepot.org
Why are the 1938 books
|
By
Wendye Ware
·
#89766
·
|
|
Re: MD&S' / SAL's Magor Pulpwood Cars
Denis,
A gondola is good for a wood rack? How's that? Did I miss something? The cars I'm talking about are pulpwood cars...
John Degnan
Scaler164@...
Denis,
A gondola is good for a wood rack? How's that? Did I miss something? The cars I'm talking about are pulpwood cars...
John Degnan
Scaler164@...
|
By
John Degnan <Scaler164@...>
·
#89765
·
|
|
Re: Freight car Distribution
Greg Martin wrote:
The account I was given for the 1950s identified the bill of lading as filled out by the shipper, but the waybill prepared by the agent--often without complete rate info as
Greg Martin wrote:
The account I was given for the 1950s identified the bill of lading as filled out by the shipper, but the waybill prepared by the agent--often without complete rate info as
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#89764
·
|
|
Re: Box/auto distribution 1938
Mike
Ok, you're wearing me down :-) I dismiss the 1938 books as irrelevant,
but if you show a consistency from 1949-1956 then I think it's worth
some digging down and trying to find out WHY SP box
Mike
Ok, you're wearing me down :-) I dismiss the 1938 books as irrelevant,
but if you show a consistency from 1949-1956 then I think it's worth
some digging down and trying to find out WHY SP box
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#89763
·
|
|
Re: Freight car Distribution
Tim O'Connor wrote:
Tim, I showed example of an Empty Car Bill in my article in the Dec. 2009 RMC. You can see that there. It is entirely different from a waybill and was used by many roads
Tim O'Connor wrote:
Tim, I showed example of an Empty Car Bill in my article in the Dec. 2009 RMC. You can see that there. It is entirely different from a waybill and was used by many roads
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#89762
·
|
|
Re: Freight car Distribution
Thanks Paul, this is very interesting stuff. Would be fun to try
to incorporate into model operations.
Tim O'Connor
Thanks Paul, this is very interesting stuff. Would be fun to try
to incorporate into model operations.
Tim O'Connor
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#89761
·
|
|
Re: Box/auto distribution 1938
Larry
Ok, you have 120 trains, 7000 cars, 2400 box cars right? Or 20 box
cars per train (on average)?
Here's a simple, straightforward probability calculation --
Let's say 4 out of 100 box cars is
Larry
Ok, you have 120 trains, 7000 cars, 2400 box cars right? Or 20 box
cars per train (on average)?
Here's a simple, straightforward probability calculation --
Let's say 4 out of 100 box cars is
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#89760
·
|
|
Re: MD&S' / SAL's Magor Pulpwood Cars
Tim
And the WrightTRAK SAL lowside gon is good for that car and also includes MD&S lettering in the decal set.
Denis Blake
--------------------------------------------------
Sent: Thursday, April
Tim
And the WrightTRAK SAL lowside gon is good for that car and also includes MD&S lettering in the decal set.
Denis Blake
--------------------------------------------------
Sent: Thursday, April
|
By
seaboard_1966
·
#89759
·
|
|
BCK PS-1's 2000-2199
Does anyone know what trucks the above had when new? I have photo's just
can't find them tonight.
Brian J. Carlson, P.E.
Cheektowaga NY
prrk41361@...
Does anyone know what trucks the above had when new? I have photo's just
can't find them tonight.
Brian J. Carlson, P.E.
Cheektowaga NY
prrk41361@...
|
By
Brian Carlson
·
#89758
·
|
|
waybills, etc (was Re: Freight car Distribution)
Fast forward to about 7:30 into this Milwaukee Road video -- very
illuminating!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-_u21pg2_M
Tim O'Connor
Fast forward to about 7:30 into this Milwaukee Road video -- very
illuminating!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-_u21pg2_M
Tim O'Connor
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#89757
·
|
|
Re: Box/auto distribution 1938
Larry Ostrech writes:
"Mark Amfahr's data showed that 30 - 33 freight trains per day crossed Sherman Hill in 1949."
Actually, so that members aren't confused, there is only one known frt conductor
Larry Ostrech writes:
"Mark Amfahr's data showed that 30 - 33 freight trains per day crossed Sherman Hill in 1949."
Actually, so that members aren't confused, there is only one known frt conductor
|
By
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
·
#89756
·
|
|
Re: Box/auto distribution 1938
Tim O'Connor, commenting on the 1938 data [ I think ] notes:
But, Tim, all of the 1938, 1949, 1951, and 1956 books show SP box cars on the UP to be present MUCH more than projected by G-N.
Mike
Tim O'Connor, commenting on the 1938 data [ I think ] notes:
But, Tim, all of the 1938, 1949, 1951, and 1956 books show SP box cars on the UP to be present MUCH more than projected by G-N.
Mike
|
By
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
·
#89755
·
|
|
Re: Freight car Distribution
Aley, Jeff A wrote:
Paul Koehler answered this clearly. I can add this: the empty car bill was filled out by the yard forces that SENT it to be loaded, in response (as you say) to an order
Aley, Jeff A wrote:
Paul Koehler answered this clearly. I can add this: the empty car bill was filled out by the yard forces that SENT it to be loaded, in response (as you say) to an order
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#89754
·
|
|
Re: Freight car distribution - a Question
Jim Betz asks:
Well, we need to keep in mind that the objective of the STMFC includes the sharing of
information about North American, standard gauge railroad freight cars in
the period 1900-1960
Jim Betz asks:
Well, we need to keep in mind that the objective of the STMFC includes the sharing of
information about North American, standard gauge railroad freight cars in
the period 1900-1960
|
By
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
·
#89753
·
|