|
Re: Weed Spray Trains
The Santa Fe's Coast Lines had a weed spray train with a retired
baggage car as a spray car and a string of Tk-K class tank cars
assigned to, and equipped for, weed chemical service; I have photos
The Santa Fe's Coast Lines had a weed spray train with a retired
baggage car as a spray car and a string of Tk-K class tank cars
assigned to, and equipped for, weed chemical service; I have photos
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#90543
·
|
|
Re: track oilers
Dennis S. wrote:
I've never heard of this either. Oiling for lubrication at sharp curves, of course, was done in the steam era and ever since.
SP designed and built its own weed spraying
Dennis S. wrote:
I've never heard of this either. Oiling for lubrication at sharp curves, of course, was done in the steam era and ever since.
SP designed and built its own weed spraying
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#90542
·
|
|
Re: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car decal
Hi Bruce and list,
In may railroad experience the coating on rails to prevent brine corrosion was a asphalt/tar like substance, about 1/16" thick that dried to a grey colored, hard coating. I dealt
Hi Bruce and list,
In may railroad experience the coating on rails to prevent brine corrosion was a asphalt/tar like substance, about 1/16" thick that dried to a grey colored, hard coating. I dealt
|
By
Ted Schnepf
·
#90544
·
|
|
track oilers, was: RE: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car dec
I was always under the impression that railroads oiled track joints for a twofold purpose; reducing mechanical wear, and ensuring that the parts would pull up tight when the track gang the joints
I was always under the impression that railroads oiled track joints for a twofold purpose; reducing mechanical wear, and ensuring that the parts would pull up tight when the track gang the joints
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#90541
·
|
|
Re: Merchants Despatch Reefer construction
Dennis S. wrote:
Wrought iron did continue to be used as small parts in car bodies, and in truss rods, for some time after steel replaced iron in virtually all large-scale applications. When
Dennis S. wrote:
Wrought iron did continue to be used as small parts in car bodies, and in truss rods, for some time after steel replaced iron in virtually all large-scale applications. When
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#90540
·
|
|
Re: track oilers, was: RE: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car dec
The Fairmont Railway Motors INC. made a "W61 Oil Sprayer" that could be towed behind a speeder. Consisted of a tank, pump with
small gasoline motor and a couple of hoses with wands/nozzles on the end.
The Fairmont Railway Motors INC. made a "W61 Oil Sprayer" that could be towed behind a speeder. Consisted of a tank, pump with
small gasoline motor and a couple of hoses with wands/nozzles on the end.
|
By
Douglas Harding <dharding@...>
·
#90539
·
|
|
Re: Merchants Despatch Reefer construction
Yeah, I've always considered the center sills and draft sills (back in those days a separate sub sill from the bolster outward), the side sills as part of the body framing, and the intermediate sills
Yeah, I've always considered the center sills and draft sills (back in those days a separate sub sill from the bolster outward), the side sills as part of the body framing, and the intermediate sills
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#90538
·
|
|
Re: Merchants Despatch Reefer construction
In my response I considered the sills as part of the body structure The underframe being the bolsters and the needle beam. I'm in 100% agreement with you on the break in dates of steel. Once steel is
In my response I considered the sills as part of the body structure The underframe being the bolsters and the needle beam. I'm in 100% agreement with you on the break in dates of steel. Once steel is
|
By
Roger Hinman <rhinman@...>
·
#90537
·
|
|
Re: PRR X-29's, NYC Lot 486 and then?
Tim-
Sorry, I was thinking about the topic from the perspective of a manufacturer or importer, not as an informed Model Railroader.
Sad as it is, sales do not follow the prototype. People don't buy
Tim-
Sorry, I was thinking about the topic from the perspective of a manufacturer or importer, not as an informed Model Railroader.
Sad as it is, sales do not follow the prototype. People don't buy
|
By
Charlie Vlk
·
#90536
·
|
|
Re: 40 ft gons Was PRR X-29's, NYC Lot 486 and then?
Not to mention "gondola-fied" flat cars, that were the ancestors of gondolas
and remained a style of revenue freight car until past the STMFC era. I think
Tichy makes the only non-resin model out
Not to mention "gondola-fied" flat cars, that were the ancestors of gondolas
and remained a style of revenue freight car until past the STMFC era. I think
Tichy makes the only non-resin model out
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#90535
·
|
|
Re: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car decal
O. F. Jordan Company made a self-propelled oil spray car that was used by several railroads, notably the Illinois Central. It looked like a large enclosed speeder and towed one or two tank trailers
O. F. Jordan Company made a self-propelled oil spray car that was used by several railroads, notably the Illinois Central. It looked like a large enclosed speeder and towed one or two tank trailers
|
By
MOFWCABOOSE@...
·
#90534
·
|
|
Re: 40 ft gons Was PRR X-29's, NYC Lot 486 and then?
Hardly, when you consider the high ratio of gons to other freight cars in the pool...
Hardly, when you consider the high ratio of gons to other freight cars in the pool...
|
By
reporterllc
·
#90533
·
|
|
Re: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car decal
GUYZ,
The Boston & Albany did this on the commuter line to riverside.
Basically a box on a flat, and a motor and spray arms. What they put
on the row was thick, black, and nasty
GUYZ,
The Boston & Albany did this on the commuter line to riverside.
Basically a box on a flat, and a motor and spray arms. What they put
on the row was thick, black, and nasty
|
By
Frederick Freitas <prrinvt@...>
·
#90532
·
|
|
Re: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car decal
Bruce Smith wrote:
Explains why when they undercut the mainline through Altoona a while back for double-stacks, the soil was not permitted to be removed from Conrail property. It was classified as
Bruce Smith wrote:
Explains why when they undercut the mainline through Altoona a while back for double-stacks, the soil was not permitted to be removed from Conrail property. It was classified as
|
By
tbarney2004
·
#90531
·
|
|
Re: Merchants Despatch Reefer construction
Iron or steel? Hardly. Look at the end of the draft sill where it shows next to the coupler; you can see the annual rings of the wood!
http://www.shorpy.com/node/8252?size=_original
Since draft
Iron or steel? Hardly. Look at the end of the draft sill where it shows next to the coupler; you can see the annual rings of the wood!
http://www.shorpy.com/node/8252?size=_original
Since draft
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#90530
·
|
|
Re: Merchants Despatch Reefer construction
The needlebeam support is wood whereas everything in the under-frame by this time was iron or steel, hence painting it a different color made some sense. It was very common on 19th century cars to
The needlebeam support is wood whereas everything in the under-frame by this time was iron or steel, hence painting it a different color made some sense. It was very common on 19th century cars to
|
By
Roger Hinman <rhinman@...>
·
#90529
·
|
|
Re: reweigh data
Though I haven't done a statistically rigorous sample, I have about
the same impression from my own freight car photo collection (which
is considerably larger than Greg's). Bear in mind that any
Though I haven't done a statistically rigorous sample, I have about
the same impression from my own freight car photo collection (which
is considerably larger than Greg's). Bear in mind that any
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#90528
·
|
|
Re: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car decal
I said:
the
Bob Witt replied:
share?
Bob,
PRR #497700, page 422, Pennsy Power 3. The caption notes that the PRR
"was one of the few railroads that did it [spay oil] mechanically."
Regards
Bruce
I said:
the
Bob Witt replied:
share?
Bob,
PRR #497700, page 422, Pennsy Power 3. The caption notes that the PRR
"was one of the few railroads that did it [spay oil] mechanically."
Regards
Bruce
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#90527
·
|
|
Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car decal
Bruce Smith wrote:
the
Bruce,
I don't believe I have ever seen an "oil spray car".
Weed sprayers, but not oil sprayers; does any one have a photo to share?
Regards,
Bob Witt
Bruce Smith wrote:
the
Bruce,
I don't believe I have ever seen an "oil spray car".
Weed sprayers, but not oil sprayers; does any one have a photo to share?
Regards,
Bob Witt
|
By
rwitt_2000
·
#90526
·
|
|
Re: reweigh data
Bruce Smith wrote:
Thanks, Bruce. That is consistent with my general impression, so I'll continue to do only an occasional off-line reweigh symbol <g>. I use a lotta Pennsy symbols for
Bruce Smith wrote:
Thanks, Bruce. That is consistent with my general impression, so I'll continue to do only an occasional off-line reweigh symbol <g>. I use a lotta Pennsy symbols for
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#90525
·
|