|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC - NYCSHS
It's more a matter of what "they" are missisng: an understanding of intelectual property laws, particularly with regard to copyrights. Not uncommon, unfortunately. In the military vehicle world
It's more a matter of what "they" are missisng: an understanding of intelectual property laws, particularly with regard to copyrights. Not uncommon, unfortunately. In the military vehicle world
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#98271
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC
Greg Martin wrote:
<<By AAR interchange rules the cars were not to be interchanged (or accepted at interchange) but the fines would be levied to the Home Road for allowing the crew to interchange
Greg Martin wrote:
<<By AAR interchange rules the cars were not to be interchanged (or accepted at interchange) but the fines would be levied to the Home Road for allowing the crew to interchange
|
By
Guy Wilber
·
#98254
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC - NYCSHS
Denis Blake:
That makes no sense. I have no problem with institutions charging whatever they want for access to or copies of their information, and I certainly understand royalty fees based on
Denis Blake:
That makes no sense. I have no problem with institutions charging whatever they want for access to or copies of their information, and I certainly understand royalty fees based on
|
By
pullmanboss <tcmadden@...>
·
#98253
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC
<<The reason I asked, a couple of nights back, about the exact stencilling requirements for interchange, had to do with the Sisk photo referenced earlier in this thread. The car has reporting marks,
<<The reason I asked, a couple of nights back, about the exact stencilling requirements for interchange, had to do with the Sisk photo referenced earlier in this thread. The car has reporting marks,
|
By
Guy Wilber
·
#98252
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC - 175000 vs 174000
#s
The 174000 series cars were "assigned" to Pacemaker service. When they were removed from Pacemaker service, they were renumbered by changing the "4" to a "5". There is at least one picture extant
The 174000 series cars were "assigned" to Pacemaker service. When they were removed from Pacemaker service, they were renumbered by changing the "4" to a "5". There is at least one picture extant
|
By
James Yaworsky
·
#98251
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC - NYCSHS
This is distressing to hear and as a member of the NYCSHS all I can say is I don't believe the general membership of the Society knew or would approve of the way this was handled.
I am reporting it
This is distressing to hear and as a member of the NYCSHS all I can say is I don't believe the general membership of the Society knew or would approve of the way this was handled.
I am reporting it
|
By
James Yaworsky
·
#98250
·
|
|
Re: Tichy Rebuilt boxcar question
It's on my modeling page: http://home.comcast.net/~jerryglow/modeling/SLSF_rebuilt.html Charlie recently asked me to do the decals so they're availble now along with a set for a similar ACL
It's on my modeling page: http://home.comcast.net/~jerryglow/modeling/SLSF_rebuilt.html Charlie recently asked me to do the decals so they're availble now along with a set for a similar ACL
|
By
jerryglow2
·
#98249
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC
You have expressed an interesting theory in a very concise and elegant matter, and as I read the "Gray Suits" sentence, I thought to myself that I've never come across a better one-liner to describe
You have expressed an interesting theory in a very concise and elegant matter, and as I read the "Gray Suits" sentence, I thought to myself that I've never come across a better one-liner to describe
|
By
James Yaworsky
·
#98248
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC - NYCSHS
Let me pipe in here if I can. I work with WrightTRAK and we were looking at doing a project, a NYC car. I contacted the NYCHS and was told, yes, they have the drawings we are looking for. We would
Let me pipe in here if I can. I work with WrightTRAK and we were looking at doing a project, a NYC car. I contacted the NYCHS and was told, yes, they have the drawings we are looking for. We would
|
By
seaboard_1966
·
#98247
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC - NYCSHS
[snip]
You raise some interesting questions, Ben. I've been a member of the NYCSHS now for four years and am aware that it has a history of not being noted as "modeler-friendly". I'm not sure this
[snip]
You raise some interesting questions, Ben. I've been a member of the NYCSHS now for four years and am aware that it has a history of not being noted as "modeler-friendly". I'm not sure this
|
By
James Yaworsky
·
#98246
·
|
|
Re: Tichy Rebuilt boxcar question
Jerry, didn't you have photos of that car? I have a couple of the Tichy cars and think this would make a great project for one of them...
--
Craig Zeni
Cary NC
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered
Jerry, didn't you have photos of that car? I have a couple of the Tichy cars and think this would make a great project for one of them...
--
Craig Zeni
Cary NC
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered
|
By
Craig Zeni
·
#98245
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC
Andy,
A car assigned to LCL service does not need a tare weight as the shipper
is not being charged by the carload. The lack of this data on the car
side would also indicated to a shipper that the
Andy,
A car assigned to LCL service does not need a tare weight as the shipper
is not being charged by the carload. The lack of this data on the car
side would also indicated to a shipper that the
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#98244
·
|
|
New Location for Napervill RPM Meet
RPM-Naperville has found a new home.
The 2011 event will be held October 20-22 at the Hickory Ridge Marriott in
Lisle, Illinois. (call 630-971-5000 for reservations). Lisle is located
about 5
RPM-Naperville has found a new home.
The 2011 event will be held October 20-22 at the Hickory Ridge Marriott in
Lisle, Illinois. (call 630-971-5000 for reservations). Lisle is located
about 5
|
By
Rhbale@...
·
#98256
·
|
|
Re: MCB or ARA Stencil Drawings
Charlie
I returned home today after getting into Kansas City on No. 4 and driving to
Bartlesville.
My "Standards" is newer than I thiught, 1975. But it had no lettering fints
in it.
Sorry
Tom
Charlie
I returned home today after getting into Kansas City on No. 4 and driving to
Bartlesville.
My "Standards" is newer than I thiught, 1975. But it had no lettering fints
in it.
Sorry
Tom
|
By
Thomas Birkett
·
#98243
·
|
|
Georgia & Florida LOs
Hi!
I recently saw a photo (scan of a slide, rather poor quality, i.e. very
small) of a strange-looking Georgia & Florida covered hopper:
http://www.ttnut.com/resources/image/2659
Possibly this is
Hi!
I recently saw a photo (scan of a slide, rather poor quality, i.e. very
small) of a strange-looking Georgia & Florida covered hopper:
http://www.ttnut.com/resources/image/2659
Possibly this is
|
By
Frank Valoczy <destron@...>
·
#98304
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC
This discussion has been quite interesting. I think it points out the risks of assuming everything worked by the book on a railroad. What the bosses put out in proclamations were not always followed
This discussion has been quite interesting. I think it points out the risks of assuming everything worked by the book on a railroad. What the bosses put out in proclamations were not always followed
|
By
dgconnery@sbcglobal.net <dgconnery@...>
·
#98242
·
|
|
Re: Weathering Couplers
First, I forgot to thank everyone who responded on this topic. I suspected
that my problem was more one of practice than technique, as most of you are
using the same basic methods I've already
First, I forgot to thank everyone who responded on this topic. I suspected
that my problem was more one of practice than technique, as most of you are
using the same basic methods I've already
|
By
Andy Harman
·
#98241
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC
Why was this information omitted? Just to prevent interchange? Not like
there's any great expense involved in providing it.
Andy
Why was this information omitted? Just to prevent interchange? Not like
there's any great expense involved in providing it.
Andy
|
By
Andy Harman
·
#98240
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC
don't
the NYC?
I've never understood why there is so little interest in the NYC in
Cincinnati. It was one of 7 original major railroads to serve the city,
and in terms of making its presence known,
don't
the NYC?
I've never understood why there is so little interest in the NYC in
Cincinnati. It was one of 7 original major railroads to serve the city,
and in terms of making its presence known,
|
By
Andy Harman
·
#98239
·
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC
Pat Wilkinson:
From comments made on the Passenger Car List over the years I gather there was a time when the "old heads" who dominated the NYCHS had little use for modelers and their interests.
Tom
Pat Wilkinson:
From comments made on the Passenger Car List over the years I gather there was a time when the "old heads" who dominated the NYCHS had little use for modelers and their interests.
Tom
|
By
pullmanboss <tcmadden@...>
·
#98238
·
|