|
Big car sale
I've reached the conclusion that I'll never live long enough to build all the cars in the kit bunker so it's time to clean house. I have listed all cars for sale on an Excel spread sheet with three
I've reached the conclusion that I'll never live long enough to build all the cars in the kit bunker so it's time to clean house. I have listed all cars for sale on an Excel spread sheet with three
|
By
Bill McCoy
·
#98734
·
|
|
Spring Mills Depot to show off Pre Production M-53 at GSMTS
Come one Come all to the GSMTS this weekend and see a pre-production
model of the Fox Valley Models M-53 Wagontop Boxcar.
That's right, come get all your questions answered as to "Is this car
really
Come one Come all to the GSMTS this weekend and see a pre-production
model of the Fox Valley Models M-53 Wagontop Boxcar.
That's right, come get all your questions answered as to "Is this car
really
|
By
Ken Braden
·
#98733
·
|
|
Re: Georgia RR decals
Tom,
You are mistaken about the paint dates. The Georgia RR rebuilt USRA
boxcars have been discussed a number of times over the years on this
list. The general consensus is that they were
Tom,
You are mistaken about the paint dates. The Georgia RR rebuilt USRA
boxcars have been discussed a number of times over the years on this
list. The general consensus is that they were
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#98732
·
|
|
Re: boxcar design evolution
Dennis Storzek wrote:
Not from all railroads. The SP had been building box cars of 9' 0" or more inside height (with Z-bar bracing) before the USRA cars came along, and after the war (when they
Dennis Storzek wrote:
Not from all railroads. The SP had been building box cars of 9' 0" or more inside height (with Z-bar bracing) before the USRA cars came along, and after the war (when they
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#98731
·
|
|
Re: Georgia RR decals
Um, yes. Tichy #9132.
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#98730
·
|
|
Re: LV decals
Good luck! Rich Meyer was working on a set, HC-53, when he passed away
and the set was never released AFAIK.
If you can find them, Champ HH-281 was special 10" heralds for hoppers,
HH-171/HH-271 were
Good luck! Rich Meyer was working on a set, HC-53, when he passed away
and the set was never released AFAIK.
If you can find them, Champ HH-281 was special 10" heralds for hoppers,
HH-171/HH-271 were
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#98729
·
|
|
Re: LV decals
Jim,
I scanned through the Herald King Decal offerings and I didn't find a set of hopper decals but there might be something in their gondola decals that would work. Might check with
Jim,
I scanned through the Herald King Decal offerings and I didn't find a set of hopper decals but there might be something in their gondola decals that would work. Might check with
|
By
Greg Martin
·
#98728
·
|
|
Re: boxcar design evolution
Speaking to the USRA in particular, I believe the use of pressed shapes was driven by the cost and demand for rolled shapes during the war. Once the stamping dies were set up for volume production,
Speaking to the USRA in particular, I believe the use of pressed shapes was driven by the cost and demand for rolled shapes during the war. Once the stamping dies were set up for volume production,
|
By
David
·
#98727
·
|
|
Re: boxcar design evolution
But then again, the ARA reverted to standard mill shapes for the stakes in MOST of the ARA standard twin, triple, and quad hoppers.
There was a reasonable amount of resistance to the 9'-0" IH of the
But then again, the ARA reverted to standard mill shapes for the stakes in MOST of the ARA standard twin, triple, and quad hoppers.
There was a reasonable amount of resistance to the 9'-0" IH of the
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#98726
·
|
|
Re: boxcar design evolution
It would seem that some 1920's cars were built with the USRA type pressed frame members, but many were not. PRR added reinforcing "boots" on the ends of the framing on many X26 USRA designed cars, and
It would seem that some 1920's cars were built with the USRA type pressed frame members, but many were not. PRR added reinforcing "boots" on the ends of the framing on many X26 USRA designed cars, and
|
By
Pieter Roos
·
#98725
·
|
|
Re: Baltimore and Ohio hopper cars...
Ben--
Thanks for the info.
Steve Lucas.
Ben--
Thanks for the info.
Steve Lucas.
|
By
Steve Lucas <stevelucas3@...>
·
#98724
·
|
|
Re: Georgia RR decals
Does anyone know of a source for white Georgia RR decals for the Tichy steel outside braced boxcar? As I understand it the silver paint scheme was not instituted until the late 1950's so not
Does anyone know of a source for white Georgia RR decals for the Tichy steel outside braced boxcar? As I understand it the silver paint scheme was not instituted until the late 1950's so not
|
By
tomedill@frontier.com
·
#98723
·
|
|
Re: boxcar design evolution
and
description of
composite
about
were
similar
pressed
- or
design
that was
--- In STMFC@..., "soolinehistory" Dennis Storzek replied:
first steel frame boxcars used stock mill shapes,
and
description of
composite
about
were
similar
pressed
- or
design
that was
--- In STMFC@..., "soolinehistory" Dennis Storzek replied:
first steel frame boxcars used stock mill shapes,
|
By
rwitt_2000
·
#98722
·
|
|
Re: boxcar design evolution
That is part of what I was wondering about Dennis. I don't know where to slot these cars (or the USRA cars) as of 1920/21.
Regarding the steel used for framing the sides, CP had over 20000 fowler
That is part of what I was wondering about Dennis. I don't know where to slot these cars (or the USRA cars) as of 1920/21.
Regarding the steel used for framing the sides, CP had over 20000 fowler
|
By
Robert kirkham
·
#98721
·
|
|
Re: boxcar design evolution
Where are you saying these fit in the evolutionary chain, Rob? The first steel frame boxcars used stock mill shapes, either Z, C, or L section, while some of the last single sheathed composite cars
Where are you saying these fit in the evolutionary chain, Rob? The first steel frame boxcars used stock mill shapes, either Z, C, or L section, while some of the last single sheathed composite cars
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#98720
·
|
|
LV decals
Guys,
Does anyone know of a good source for Lehigh Valley decals? I've got a Stewart fish-belly side hopper that I'd like to paint for Lehigh Valley. Thanks.
Jim Hunter
Guys,
Does anyone know of a good source for Lehigh Valley decals? I've got a Stewart fish-belly side hopper that I'd like to paint for Lehigh Valley. Thanks.
Jim Hunter
|
By
naptownprr
·
#98719
·
|
|
Re: Missouri Pacific Boxcar
The distinctive fishbelly underbelly underfrmes were used for a caboose rebuilding program starting in the late 40's and into the 50's resulting in what became the de facto standard steel caboose of
The distinctive fishbelly underbelly underfrmes were used for a caboose rebuilding program starting in the late 40's and into the 50's resulting in what became the de facto standard steel caboose of
|
By
jerryglow2
·
#98718
·
|
|
Re: Missouri Pacific Boxcar
This is one of a large number of single-sheathed cars which were upgraded to all-steel by MoPac at the DeSoto (MO) shop in the early 1950s. The original ends remained. Some cars had the Murphy as
This is one of a large number of single-sheathed cars which were upgraded to all-steel by MoPac at the DeSoto (MO) shop in the early 1950s. The original ends remained. Some cars had the Murphy as
|
By
mopacfirst
·
#98717
·
|
|
Re: Missouri Pacific Boxcar
The Missouri Pacific boxcar photos are up. They can be seen here.http://groups.yahoo.com/group/STMFC/photos/album/619899423/pic/list
The Missouri Pacific boxcar photos are up. They can be seen here.http://groups.yahoo.com/group/STMFC/photos/album/619899423/pic/list
|
By
Ricky Gilmore <x_white.bear_x@...>
·
#98716
·
|
|
Re: boxcar design evolution
Rob Kirkham wrote:
I don't know the answer to your question, Rob, but SP and several other railroads which had received USRA single-sheathed cars did not duplicate them in subsequent years but
Rob Kirkham wrote:
I don't know the answer to your question, Rob, but SP and several other railroads which had received USRA single-sheathed cars did not duplicate them in subsequent years but
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#98715
·
|