main@RealSTMFC.groups.io

Kadee Wheelsets

Sam Clarke e-mailed me this morning to say that Kadee's Code 88 wheelsets, which I knew they were thinking seriously about, already exist and are in the catalog. Stock numbers are: #530 33"

By Richard Hendrickson · #99049 ·

Formed wire?

Hope I might acquire insights from the experienced here. I'm working on a couple of TT scale projects for which I wish to learn how some of the parts manufacturers form wire into railings, eye bolts,

By Brian <cornbeltroute@...> · #99048 ·

Re: TC boxcar nomenclature correction

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:26:05 -0700, David Sieber wrote Maybe but the stepped bolster tab info is pretty interesting, and I will start looking for it and hopefully use it to at least identify PS built

By Andy Harman · #99047 ·

Re: Necessary Freight cars (UNCLASSIFIED)

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:03:14 -0500, cvlk wrote It would be fascinating to see the process of how a 3D CAD drawing of the prototype is turned into the actual tooling specs for the model. I've been

By Andy Harman · #99046 ·

Re: TC boxcar nomenclature correction

My apologies to all - that last email was intended to go only to Jim King. I'm a very satisfied customer of Smokey Mountain Model Works. Dave Sieber

By David Sieber · #99045 ·

Re: TC boxcar nomenclature correction

Jim, Thank God - I was beginning to doubt my sanity or my memory (or both), since I thought the TC boxcar had been built with the Pullman riveted roof (smooth, with overlapping sections above

By David Sieber · #99044 ·

Re: Necessary Freight cars (UNCLASSIFIED)

Rob Kirkham wrote: "But it makes me wonder - would useful CAD drawings substantially reduce a manufacturer's costs and make some projects more viable?" Good question. I am not sure the jury is in

By Charlie Vlk · #99043 ·

Looking for David Orr, Don Strong

David Orr and Don Strong, please contact me off-list. I need your email address. Jim King Smoky Mountain Model Works, Inc. Ph. (828) 777-5619 <www.smokymountainmodelworks.com>

By Jim King · #99042 ·

Re: SSW Double sheathed Boxcars

Here is a good start: http://sunshinekits.com/sunimages/sun52b.pdf - Steve Hedlund, Silver Lake WA To: STMFC@... From: losgatos48@... Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:54:06

By S hed <shed999@...> · #99041 ·

Re: Kadee Trucks

So now we have the Proto 2000 Type B and the Kadee Type B-1. Does the Athern truck represent a true B-1? Thanks: Bill Pardie [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

By WILLIAM PARDIE · #99040 ·

Re: Missing Significant Frt Cars

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:08:45 -0400, mike brock wrote Regardless, between the slope sheets and the side profile, it's distinctly different in appearance from the H2/3 and forget kitbashing it. The H10

By Andy Harman · #99039 ·

TC boxcar nomenclature correction

It was pointed out to me yesterday that terminology I used (as provided to me during the design phase) on the 1941-built Tennessee Central boxcar was incorrect. The design IS correct and, therefore,

By Jim King · #99038 ·

Re: Kadee Trucks

Richard, Just teasing my buddy Brian, who has a way of twisting my mind around when it comes to freight car trucks! Paul Lyons

By Paul Lyons · #99037 ·

Re: Missing Significant Frt Cars

I wrote: And Andy Harman replied: I could not access that address. Of course these are models but prototype photos reveal the same comparison. The You are correct. Photos in Andrew Dow's book

By mike brock <brockm@...> · #99036 ·

Re: Kadee Trucks

Relax, Paul. Brian is entirely correct, but the differences are very subtle and often impossible to see in prototype photos. Most viewers, even on this list, will never be able to tell whether

By Richard Hendrickson · #99035 ·

SSW Double sheathed Boxcars

I am looking for information on the Cotton Belt rebuilt double sheathed wood boxcars that were in the 36,000 series. The cars had a 10'2" interior height. I am trying to find a car diagram for the

By losgatos48@... · #99034 ·

Re: Necessary Freight cars (UNCLASSIFIED)

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:05:25 -0000, jaydeet2001 wrote I could certainly get into that. Maybe not quite in the same quantity as the H10 but, I could use quite a few. Andy

By Andy Harman · #99033 ·

Re: Necessary Freight cars (UNCLASSIFIED)

Yes. One could oversimplify and call it the AMC version. And then there's the NYC's shorter (lengthwise) version of the AAR standard offset twin. David Thompson

By David · #99032 ·

Re: Necessary Freight cars (UNCLASSIFIED)

On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:11:24 -0400, Gatwood, Elden SAW wrote It wouldn't be the first time manufacturer(s) put up a smoke screen. I don't have a problem with them telling me "no comment" or "none of

By Andy Harman · #99031 ·

Re: Necessary Freight cars (UNCLASSIFIED)

Not necessarily just coal road modelers.The wheel reports that I have indicate that hoppers were second only to box cars in number.Armand Premo

By armprem2 <armprem2@...> · #99030 ·

Messages