|
Re: DL&W 44078 (was Photo: SRLX Reefers)
i guess your first quest would be an
ORER for dims? for slicing & dicing
mel perry
i guess your first quest would be an
ORER for dims? for slicing & dicing
mel perry
|
By
mel perry
·
#169000
·
|
|
Re: Photo: SRLX Reefers
Richard is correct... the reporting marks show a S.R.I.X. on my 27” 5 k monitor.
Bill Daniels
Santa Rosa, California
Richard is correct... the reporting marks show a S.R.I.X. on my 27” 5 k monitor.
Bill Daniels
Santa Rosa, California
|
By
Bill Daniels <billinsf@...>
·
#168999
·
|
|
Re: DL&W 44078 (was Photo: SRLX Reefers)
Thanks Ben. Well, good to put that confusion aside. My first impression had been steel sheathing and imagined a re-build. Looking twice, I see no rivets.
USRA double sheathed boxcar it is.
Rob
Thanks Ben. Well, good to put that confusion aside. My first impression had been steel sheathing and imagined a re-build. Looking twice, I see no rivets.
USRA double sheathed boxcar it is.
Rob
|
By
Robert kirkham
·
#168998
·
|
|
Re: micro coat flat
If'n you have a bottle of clear, and you wonder whether it is gloss or flat: the flat will have "sediment" (the flattening agent), after it's been sitting awhile.
When I've wanted more "flatness" in
If'n you have a bottle of clear, and you wonder whether it is gloss or flat: the flat will have "sediment" (the flattening agent), after it's been sitting awhile.
When I've wanted more "flatness" in
|
By
spsalso
·
#168997
·
|
|
Re: DL&W 44078 (was Photo: SRLX Reefers)
Rob Kirkham asked:
"I was wondering if there is an existing model for this other car (shown in the photo Bob has linked below.) It looks like the Tichy 3001 end would be a good starting point, and
Rob Kirkham asked:
"I was wondering if there is an existing model for this other car (shown in the photo Bob has linked below.) It looks like the Tichy 3001 end would be a good starting point, and
|
By
Benjamin Hom
·
#168996
·
|
|
DL&W 44078 (was Photo: SRLX Reefers)
I was wondering if there is an existing model for this other car (shown in the photo Bob has linked below.) It looks like the Tichy 3001 end would be a good starting point, and maybe ? an Accurail
I was wondering if there is an existing model for this other car (shown in the photo Bob has linked below.) It looks like the Tichy 3001 end would be a good starting point, and maybe ? an Accurail
|
By
Robert kirkham
·
#168995
·
|
|
Re: SN Tank Car MW 68
Garth,
I don't have my ORERs where I can get at them (recent move). Can't you
find out info about this car in them going by car number and "go from there"?
If you can find the car(s) you should
Garth,
I don't have my ORERs where I can get at them (recent move). Can't you
find out info about this car in them going by car number and "go from there"?
If you can find the car(s) you should
|
By
Jim Betz
·
#168994
·
|
|
Re: Photo: SRLX Reefers
See;
By
Jon Miller <atsfus@...>
·
#168993
·
|
|
Re: Photo: DL&W 70793
In the early 20th century, there were cars called "hopper-bottom gondolas," that had modest amounts of slope sheets to help most of the cargo depart through the doors. In later years, the hopper
In the early 20th century, there were cars called "hopper-bottom gondolas," that had modest amounts of slope sheets to help most of the cargo depart through the doors. In later years, the hopper
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#168992
·
|
|
Re: Photo: SRLX Reefers
The CBC plans and photo are for a steel-bodied version of the car, lettered SRIX 101, built 10-29.
Richard Townsend
Lincoln City, OR
The CBC plans and photo are for a steel-bodied version of the car, lettered SRIX 101, built 10-29.
Richard Townsend
Lincoln City, OR
|
By
Richard Townsend
·
#168991
·
|
|
Re: Photo: SRLX Reefers
I don't think they are SRLX cars. I think they are SRIX. The dot after the "I" makes it look like an "L". My 1931 CBC on pages 190-192 has a photo and plans. The cars used a "silica-gel iceless
I don't think they are SRLX cars. I think they are SRIX. The dot after the "I" makes it look like an "L". My 1931 CBC on pages 190-192 has a photo and plans. The cars used a "silica-gel iceless
|
By
Richard Townsend
·
#168990
·
|
|
Photo: SRLX Reefers
Photo: SRLX Reefers
Does anyone have details about the Swift refrigerator cars that are on the right side of this
Photo: SRLX Reefers
Does anyone have details about the Swift refrigerator cars that are on the right side of this
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#168989
·
|
|
Re: Photo: DL&W 70793
eric:
understand whar you are saying, question arises, in regards to the
useage of only one set of truss
rods?, normally two sets were the
minimum, usually inside and outside,
matter of a fact, i csn
eric:
understand whar you are saying, question arises, in regards to the
useage of only one set of truss
rods?, normally two sets were the
minimum, usually inside and outside,
matter of a fact, i csn
|
By
mel perry
·
#168988
·
|
|
Re: Photo: DL&W 70793
I have an ACF builders photo (1907) of D&H 27507 - adefinite hopper - with "xxxx hopper door service |patented" on the side. Very similar construction (atleast given the two photos).
Most hoppers
I have an ACF builders photo (1907) of D&H 27507 - adefinite hopper - with "xxxx hopper door service |patented" on the side. Very similar construction (atleast given the two photos).
Most hoppers
|
By
Bob Webber
·
#168987
·
|
|
Re: Youngstown Door Nomenclature
Andy,
Thanks for providing this information; I have copied and pasted to a word document and saved for reference; much appreciated.
Jim Brewer
Glenwood MD
Andy,
Thanks for providing this information; I have copied and pasted to a word document and saved for reference; much appreciated.
Jim Brewer
Glenwood MD
|
By
James Brewer
·
#168986
·
|
|
Re: Photo: DL&W 70793
I found the same listings as Eric, and these cars are present in my 1930 ORER, but not my 1935.
I think they are "legitimate" class HT cars. There is a clamshell-type hopper chute just in front of
I found the same listings as Eric, and these cars are present in my 1930 ORER, but not my 1935.
I think they are "legitimate" class HT cars. There is a clamshell-type hopper chute just in front of
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#168985
·
|
|
Re: Photo: DL&W 70793
These MCB/ARA/AAR car codes are a moving target. Designations depend upon era and what the railroad applies as the designation.
In this specific case (DL&W 70793), the MCB designation for DL&W
These MCB/ARA/AAR car codes are a moving target. Designations depend upon era and what the railroad applies as the designation.
In this specific case (DL&W 70793), the MCB designation for DL&W
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#168984
·
|
|
Re: Photo: DL&W 70793
I think it's been said before - a GB gondola is a car with ends, sides, no roof, and a flat,
solid bottom for cargo space. The height of the sides, or ends, or whether the car was purpose built
or
I think it's been said before - a GB gondola is a car with ends, sides, no roof, and a flat,
solid bottom for cargo space. The height of the sides, or ends, or whether the car was purpose built
or
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#168983
·
|
|
Re: Photo: DL&W 70793
Mel and Bob,
I'd go with gondola too. The car obviously was constructed as a single piece, rather than a box added to a flat car. I don't see actual stake pockets here, just the stake permanently
Mel and Bob,
I'd go with gondola too. The car obviously was constructed as a single piece, rather than a box added to a flat car. I don't see actual stake pockets here, just the stake permanently
|
By
Garth Groff and Sally Sanford <mallardlodge1000@...>
·
#168982
·
|
|
Re: SN Tank Car MW 68
David,
My correspondence with Ed was several years ago. Perhaps he was only saying this wasn't an AC&F Type 7. I do remember he said AC&F never made any cars with this gallonage, but again, this may
David,
My correspondence with Ed was several years ago. Perhaps he was only saying this wasn't an AC&F Type 7. I do remember he said AC&F never made any cars with this gallonage, but again, this may
|
By
Garth Groff and Sally Sanford <mallardlodge1000@...>
·
#168981
·
|