|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
Yes, even a museum got these reporting marks confused.
Bob Chaparro
Hemet, CA
Yes, even a museum got these reporting marks confused.
Bob Chaparro
Hemet, CA
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#196438
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 09:32 AM, Bruce Smith wrote:
The point was being made that the SLRX cars (aka Anheuser-Busch), seen in the photo of Cincy, were not noted in the NYC consists on the CASO
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 09:32 AM, Bruce Smith wrote:
The point was being made that the SLRX cars (aka Anheuser-Busch), seen in the photo of Cincy, were not noted in the NYC consists on the CASO
|
By
Jack Mullen
·
#196437
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
Ben, it wasn’t intended to be a threadjack; it was merely an observation (along with a few others) about the photo and the makeup of the cars therein.
The data aren’t only from the CASO railroad.
Ben, it wasn’t intended to be a threadjack; it was merely an observation (along with a few others) about the photo and the makeup of the cars therein.
The data aren’t only from the CASO railroad.
|
By
nyc3001 .
·
#196436
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
Alex Schneider wrote:
"The scope of the CASO site is all NYC, notwithstanding the name."
...except as Bruce Smith pointed out, the observation that drove the threadjack you asked
Alex Schneider wrote:
"The scope of the CASO site is all NYC, notwithstanding the name."
...except as Bruce Smith pointed out, the observation that drove the threadjack you asked
|
By
Benjamin Hom
·
#196435
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
The scope of the CASO site is all NYC, notwithstanding the name.
Alex Schneider
The scope of the CASO site is all NYC, notwithstanding the name.
Alex Schneider
|
By
Alex Schneider
·
#196434
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Boston & Albany Boxcar 39708
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 03:48 PM, Dave Parker wrote:
Except that, as far as I know, the B&A cars sporting "innie" Murphy ends also had Hutchins roofs and ladders rather than grabs, as seems to be the
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 03:48 PM, Dave Parker wrote:
Except that, as far as I know, the B&A cars sporting "innie" Murphy ends also had Hutchins roofs and ladders rather than grabs, as seems to be the
|
By
Dennis Storzek
·
#196433
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
Alex Schneider asked:
"...the photo was taken in Cincinnati. How would Canada be involved?"
Check upthread - there was a minor threadjack (triggered by the presence of a cut of St Louis Refrigerator
Alex Schneider asked:
"...the photo was taken in Cincinnati. How would Canada be involved?"
Check upthread - there was a minor threadjack (triggered by the presence of a cut of St Louis Refrigerator
|
By
Benjamin Hom
·
#196432
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
Alex,
The point was being made that the SLRX cars (aka Anheuser-Busch), seen in the photo of Cincy, were not noted in the NYC consists on the CASO (canadasouthern.com) site. Thus, they likely did not
Alex,
The point was being made that the SLRX cars (aka Anheuser-Busch), seen in the photo of Cincy, were not noted in the NYC consists on the CASO (canadasouthern.com) site. Thus, they likely did not
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#196431
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
Ken, the photo was taken in Cincinnati. How would Canada be involved?
Alex Schneider
Ken, the photo was taken in Cincinnati. How would Canada be involved?
Alex Schneider
|
By
Alex Schneider
·
#196430
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
Would car loads of Alcohol and the like have been sealed by a customs official to avoid delays if it was passed through Canada on a train that didn't stop in Canada? In the UK untaxed alcohol is
Would car loads of Alcohol and the like have been sealed by a customs official to avoid delays if it was passed through Canada on a train that didn't stop in Canada? In the UK untaxed alcohol is
|
By
Philip Dove
·
#196429
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
The humidifier might speed up corrosion and decay of models. A lot of my stock is made of card, it warps in humidity. I might invite heavy smokers to operate the layout.
The humidifier might speed up corrosion and decay of models. A lot of my stock is made of card, it warps in humidity. I might invite heavy smokers to operate the layout.
|
By
Philip Dove
·
#196428
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
While I believe Jack's comment is probably the "real" answer...
Note also that SLRX would be carrying beer - an alcoholic product - there *may* have been "administrivia" issues going thru Canada (more
While I believe Jack's comment is probably the "real" answer...
Note also that SLRX would be carrying beer - an alcoholic product - there *may* have been "administrivia" issues going thru Canada (more
|
By
akerboomk
·
#196427
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:13 AM, nyc3001 . wrote:
Note that there are 3 SLRX insulated boxcars in the foreground. In the consists at canadasouthern.com, there isn't a single instance of a SLRX car
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:13 AM, nyc3001 . wrote:
Note that there are 3 SLRX insulated boxcars in the foreground. In the consists at canadasouthern.com, there isn't a single instance of a SLRX car
|
By
Jack Mullen
·
#196426
·
|
|
Re: Viiew of PFE Reefer Under Body
At 18:33 there is an excellent Duryea underframe shot of one of the Rio Grande boxcars that Yarmouth did.
Scott McDonald
At 18:33 there is an excellent Duryea underframe shot of one of the Rio Grande boxcars that Yarmouth did.
Scott McDonald
|
By
Scott
·
#196425
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
Especially when they are next to one another in the train! :>)
Steve Hile
Especially when they are next to one another in the train! :>)
Steve Hile
|
By
Steve and Barb Hile
·
#196424
·
|
|
Viiew of PFE Reefer Under Body
An excellent view of the bottom of a PFE car in direct sunlight can be seen at 20:40.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBpr05y4KeE
An excellent view of the bottom of a PFE car in direct sunlight can be seen at 20:40.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBpr05y4KeE
|
By
Rod Miller
·
#196423
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Boston & Albany Boxcar 39708
Thank you Dennis, I was wondering.
I have to make one.
Fenton
Thank you Dennis, I was wondering.
I have to make one.
Fenton
|
By
O Fenton Wells
·
#196422
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Boston & Albany Boxcar 39708
I tried to post the following on the Facebook group but could not make it work: This box car is a 1914 NYC Lines standard of which 7405 were built.It is similar to the 1912 design of which 16000 were
I tried to post the following on the Facebook group but could not make it work: This box car is a 1914 NYC Lines standard of which 7405 were built.It is similar to the 1912 design of which 16000 were
|
By
lrkdbn
·
#196421
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Boston & Albany Boxcar 39708
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 02:17 PM, Dennis Storzek wrote:
That's specifically the prototype for the Accurail 1300 series.Except that, as far as I know, the B&A cars sporting "innie" Murphy ends also had
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 02:17 PM, Dennis Storzek wrote:
That's specifically the prototype for the Accurail 1300 series.Except that, as far as I know, the B&A cars sporting "innie" Murphy ends also had
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#196420
·
|
|
Re: Photo: NYC Cincinnati Freight Yard (1954)
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:13 AM, nyc3001 . wrote:
It's also interesting how few Central cars are clearly visible in the shot.But there is a Soo Line car, the next track over from the locomotive.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:13 AM, nyc3001 . wrote:
It's also interesting how few Central cars are clearly visible in the shot.But there is a Soo Line car, the next track over from the locomotive.
|
By
Dennis Storzek
·
#196419
·
|