|
Re: MKT cars
Does the Intermountain War Emergency car come close to these.
Rob McLear
Aussie.
Does the Intermountain War Emergency car come close to these.
Rob McLear
Aussie.
|
By
roblmclear
·
#158972
·
|
|
Re: MKT cars
Master Modeler Welch was (is?) working on the War Emergency car. Suggest searching "Welch mkt" - I turned up some posts in May of this year.
Have fun
Steve
Master Modeler Welch was (is?) working on the War Emergency car. Suggest searching "Welch mkt" - I turned up some posts in May of this year.
Have fun
Steve
|
By
steve_wintner
·
#158971
·
|
|
Re: MKT cars
Rob
MKT still had yellow box cars in the 1950's. And they built brand newyellow box cars
in 1943 for the "war emergency". Those would most likely stillbe yellow in 1947.
Tim O'
--
Tim
Rob
MKT still had yellow box cars in the 1950's. And they built brand newyellow box cars
in 1943 for the "war emergency". Those would most likely stillbe yellow in 1947.
Tim O'
--
Tim
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#158970
·
|
|
MKT cars
Hello
I have a question for the guru's on this list, I am quite enamoured with the MKT's yellow boxcars and am hoping that Speedwitch will be doing a re-run of the resin kit one day. I haven't been
Hello
I have a question for the guru's on this list, I am quite enamoured with the MKT's yellow boxcars and am hoping that Speedwitch will be doing a re-run of the resin kit one day. I haven't been
|
By
roblmclear
·
#158969
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
David,
The Sacramento Northern still rostered a few revenue-service flats and gondolas with wooden end sills into the 1950s. Don't forget that MW equipment even on larger
David,
The Sacramento Northern still rostered a few revenue-service flats and gondolas with wooden end sills into the 1950s. Don't forget that MW equipment even on larger
|
By
Garth Groff <sarahsan@...>
·
#158968
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
Hi Tim,
In what timeframe would that have been?
Pax,
Ralph Brown
Portland, Maine
PRRT&HS No. 3966
NMRA No. L2532
rbrown51[at]maine[dot]rr[dot]com
Hi Tim,
In what timeframe would that have been?
Pax,
Ralph Brown
Portland, Maine
PRRT&HS No. 3966
NMRA No. L2532
rbrown51[at]maine[dot]rr[dot]com
|
By
Ralph W. Brown
·
#158967
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
standard gauge (Washington, Idaho & Montana Railroad)
--
*Tim O'Connor*
*Sterling, Massachusetts*
standard gauge (Washington, Idaho & Montana Railroad)
--
*Tim O'Connor*
*Sterling, Massachusetts*
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#158966
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 02:48 PM, Peter Ness wrote:
it rested on the end of the deck of the car in front – so the hand brake wheel was lowered for clearance.And in such location was inoperative. The
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 02:48 PM, Peter Ness wrote:
it rested on the end of the deck of the car in front – so the hand brake wheel was lowered for clearance.And in such location was inoperative. The
|
By
Dennis Storzek <destorzek@...>
·
#158965
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
The photo of a rotated brake wheel is, I would say, for a very non-typical car because it has a wood end sill. I’m guessing a narrow gauge car, but I abso-posilutely guarantee that cars in the time
The photo of a rotated brake wheel is, I would say, for a very non-typical car because it has a wood end sill. I’m guessing a narrow gauge car, but I abso-posilutely guarantee that cars in the time
|
By
David Soderblom
·
#158964
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
Thanks all.
OK – so my understanding is correct in so far as when on hand brake wheel is lowered it is non-operational.
Tim – the side-drop wheel doesn’t muddy the water too much, but
Thanks all.
OK – so my understanding is correct in so far as when on hand brake wheel is lowered it is non-operational.
Tim – the side-drop wheel doesn’t muddy the water too much, but
|
By
Peter Ness
·
#158963
·
|
|
Re: Inside view of NP circular roof construction
I believe it to be a Chicago-Climax Radial roof.
norm buckhart
I believe it to be a Chicago-Climax Radial roof.
norm buckhart
|
By
Norm Buckhart
·
#158962
·
|
|
Re: Inside view of NP circular roof construction
ok - I was being too general - i guess up in 4800-4900 series
I think the number in the photo may be 4950
ok - I was being too general - i guess up in 4800-4900 series
I think the number in the photo may be 4950
|
By
Norm Buckhart
·
#158961
·
|
|
Re: Inside view of NP circular roof construction
Eric,
I believe the 4900 class is 1929 build by PC&F IIRC. Too late for your modeling. Sorry. Jim
Eric,
I believe the 4900 class is 1929 build by PC&F IIRC. Too late for your modeling. Sorry. Jim
|
By
np328
·
#158960
·
|
|
Re: Inside view of NP circular roof construction
Dave Nelson asked about the roof. Is it well documented? Yes the 6000 series car is very well documented, with numerous paper plans. However I do not have these all scanned. And like much research,
Dave Nelson asked about the roof. Is it well documented? Yes the 6000 series car is very well documented, with numerous paper plans. However I do not have these all scanned. And like much research,
|
By
np328
·
#158959
·
|
|
Re: Inside view of NP circular roof construction
Hmmm. Yes, you are correct for thatimage. I think Jim Dick introduced this to the conversation but may not haverealized it was not the same as the car in the links with the damaged Cleveland tractors.
Hmmm. Yes, you are correct for thatimage. I think Jim Dick introduced this to the conversation but may not haverealized it was not the same as the car in the links with the damaged Cleveland tractors.
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#158958
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
If the load hung over the end of the car, there probably was an"idler" car, and
that car's hand brake could be used to anchor the loaded car.
More typical would be a load that needed access from the
If the load hung over the end of the car, there probably was an"idler" car, and
that car's hand brake could be used to anchor the loaded car.
More typical would be a load that needed access from the
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#158957
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
and just to muddy the waters a bit... :-)
--
*Tim O'Connor*
*Sterling, Massachusetts*
and just to muddy the waters a bit... :-)
--
*Tim O'Connor*
*Sterling, Massachusetts*
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#158956
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
So, kind of paraphrasing what's been said:
If a brake wheel was lowered, it was raised the first time someone needed to use it. And it stayed that way until there was a reason to lower it.
The
So, kind of paraphrasing what's been said:
If a brake wheel was lowered, it was raised the first time someone needed to use it. And it stayed that way until there was a reason to lower it.
The
|
By
spsalso
·
#158955
·
|
|
Re: Stupid hand brake question
Hey, it's work to lower the brake staff. The brakes were usually in the up position, unless there was some reason (such as interference with the load). Since the hand brake was otherwise required to
Hey, it's work to lower the brake staff. The brakes were usually in the up position, unless there was some reason (such as interference with the load). Since the hand brake was otherwise required to
|
By
Dennis Storzek <destorzek@...>
·
#158954
·
|
|
Re: Inside view of NP circular roof construction
maybe we’re talking about two different cars
here’s the one I am referring to
norm
maybe we’re talking about two different cars
here’s the one I am referring to
norm
|
By
Norm Buckhart
·
#158953
·
|