|
Re: Depression era / pre-WWII Covered Hoppers?
Dave,
There were large tire manufacturing plants on the West Coast as well that would have received carbon black. I well remember driving past the U.S. Rubber Co. plant in East Los
Dave,
There were large tire manufacturing plants on the West Coast as well that would have received carbon black. I well remember driving past the U.S. Rubber Co. plant in East Los
|
By
Garth Groff <sarahsan@...>
·
#138080
·
|
|
Re: early covered hoppers
Railmodel Journal 12/1991 pp.20-25 includes photo LOFX #301
Not the same car, but probably painted the same way.
Railmodel Journal 12/1991 pp.20-25 includes photo LOFX #301
Not the same car, but probably painted the same way.
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#138079
·
|
|
Re: contact adhesive between 2 release papers
Recent MR has an article with many uses for this kind of product form model RR's.
Bill Welch
Recent MR has an article with many uses for this kind of product form model RR's.
Bill Welch
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#138078
·
|
|
Re: roof on FGEX ex-PRR R7 reefers
The Hutchins type roof for the Westerfield kit is incorrect. The panels did not have any stiffener in the middle of the panels. Where Hutchin's roofs were used the unique FGE roof hatch support can be
The Hutchins type roof for the Westerfield kit is incorrect. The panels did not have any stiffener in the middle of the panels. Where Hutchin's roofs were used the unique FGE roof hatch support can be
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#138077
·
|
|
Re: contact adhesive between 2 release papers
The product's bag is unmarked; the product peel-away paper says "3M 300LSE"...
The product's bag is unmarked; the product peel-away paper says "3M 300LSE"...
|
By
Craig Zeni
·
#138076
·
|
|
Re: contact adhesive between 2 release papers
I have used the 3M Scotch brand 465, 2 mil high tack adhesive transfer tape, 3/4 in x 60 yd. ( 3M no. 212-0163 ) for many years with excellent results. My cost at the local art materials store named
I have used the 3M Scotch brand 465, 2 mil high tack adhesive transfer tape, 3/4 in x 60 yd. ( 3M no. 212-0163 ) for many years with excellent results. My cost at the local art materials store named
|
By
frograbbit602
·
#138075
·
|
|
early covered hoppers
Group,
This is a new thread, but is part of the conversation on pre-WWII covered hoppers. One of the earliest of covered hoppers are the ones shown in the August of 1964 Model Railroader and
Group,
This is a new thread, but is part of the conversation on pre-WWII covered hoppers. One of the earliest of covered hoppers are the ones shown in the August of 1964 Model Railroader and
|
By
Eric Mumper
·
#138074
·
|
|
Re: roof on FGEX ex-PRR R7 reefers
Scott
Photos show at least two different roof styles. I don't know which type is on
the Westerfield model but I'm sure it's accurate.
Tim O'
Scott
Photos show at least two different roof styles. I don't know which type is on
the Westerfield model but I'm sure it's accurate.
Tim O'
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#138073
·
|
|
roof on FGEX ex-PRR R7 reefers
A friend is curious if anyone knows what style roof FGE's former Pennsy R7 ice reefers had. One of them appears in those Pittsburgh produce terminal photos, and we can't tell if the roof has a center
A friend is curious if anyone knows what style roof FGE's former Pennsy R7 ice reefers had. One of them appears in those Pittsburgh produce terminal photos, and we can't tell if the roof has a center
|
By
D. Scott Chatfield
·
#138072
·
|
|
Re: damage claims (was Re: Livestock through Chicago)
Testimony it may be -- but it's just hearsay until someone has numbers.:-)
Tim O'
Testimony it may be -- but it's just hearsay until someone has numbers.:-)
Tim O'
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#138071
·
|
|
Re: damage claims (was Re: Livestock through Chicago)
Tim O'Connor wrote:
Tim, perhaps it occurs to you that if I had numbers, I would have provided them. If someone can show them, I'd be most interested. But I am quoting PFE people who worked in
Tim O'Connor wrote:
Tim, perhaps it occurs to you that if I had numbers, I would have provided them. If someone can show them, I'd be most interested. But I am quoting PFE people who worked in
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#138070
·
|
|
Re: damage claims (was Re: Livestock through Chicago)
Tony, I'd really like to see actual NUMBERS. I've heard these kindsof
claims before (Richard loved to pick on the PRR!) but when I've seenactual
numbers, the differences between PRR and ATSF (for
Tony, I'd really like to see actual NUMBERS. I've heard these kindsof
claims before (Richard loved to pick on the PRR!) but when I've seenactual
numbers, the differences between PRR and ATSF (for
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#138069
·
|
|
Re: Livestock through Chicago
Greg Martin wrote:
So clearly the PRR record of high perishable claims PER TON-MILE do reflect the quality of PRR handling of perishables, whatever may have happened on connecting roads.
Tony
Greg Martin wrote:
So clearly the PRR record of high perishable claims PER TON-MILE do reflect the quality of PRR handling of perishables, whatever may have happened on connecting roads.
Tony
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#138068
·
|
|
Re: contact adhesive between 2 release papers
And the name of the product, Craig, was . . .???
Schuyler
Subject: [STMFC] Re: contact adhesive between 2 release papers
I picked up a couple of sheet of a 3M product that were on markdown
And the name of the product, Craig, was . . .???
Schuyler
Subject: [STMFC] Re: contact adhesive between 2 release papers
I picked up a couple of sheet of a 3M product that were on markdown
|
By
Schuyler Larrabee
·
#138067
·
|
|
Re: Livestock through Chicago
Tim,
It really doesn't matter where the damage occurred as a claim followed therevenue stream and every road shared the burden of the claim in directproportion to the percentage of mileage/hours
Tim,
It really doesn't matter where the damage occurred as a claim followed therevenue stream and every road shared the burden of the claim in directproportion to the percentage of mileage/hours
|
By
Greg Martin
·
#138066
·
|
|
Re: Livestock through Chicago
Begging the Sheriff's indulgence, since this topic is wandering towards the edge, Doug's data, combined with the ICC data I have may be providing some unique insight into a market transition, similar
Begging the Sheriff's indulgence, since this topic is wandering towards the edge, Doug's data, combined with the ICC data I have may be providing some unique insight into a market transition, similar
|
By
devansprr
·
#138065
·
|
|
Re: contact adhesive between 2 release papers
On 10/18/2015 4:48 AM, Howard R Garner cascaderail@... [STMFC] wrote:
Found all different sizes on Zoro! This is a good place to buy for all sorts of stuff.
On 10/18/2015 4:48 AM, Howard R Garner cascaderail@... [STMFC] wrote:
Found all different sizes on Zoro! This is a good place to buy for all sorts of stuff.
|
By
Jon Miller <atsfus@...>
·
#138061
·
|
|
Re: contact adhesive between 2 release papers
I picked up a couple of sheet of a 3M product that were on markdown from Digikey. It's great stuff...I've used it to mount small speakers in locomotive tenders.
Craig Zeni
Cary NC
I picked up a couple of sheet of a 3M product that were on markdown from Digikey. It's great stuff...I've used it to mount small speakers in locomotive tenders.
Craig Zeni
Cary NC
|
By
Craig Zeni
·
#138060
·
|
|
Re: contact adhesive between 2 release papers
Two products from 3M
467 MP 2 mil thickness
568 MP 5 mil thickness
467 is used by many of the laser kit for their "peel and stick" items
ULine is one source as is the bay
Howard Garner
Two products from 3M
467 MP 2 mil thickness
568 MP 5 mil thickness
467 is used by many of the laser kit for their "peel and stick" items
ULine is one source as is the bay
Howard Garner
|
By
earlyrail
·
#138059
·
|
|
Re: Livestock through Chicago
In a message dated 10/18/2015 12:47:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time,STMFC@... writes:
Not really that far off. If the shipper would acquire their own equipmentthe railroad had less of a point to argue
In a message dated 10/18/2015 12:47:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time,STMFC@... writes:
Not really that far off. If the shipper would acquire their own equipmentthe railroad had less of a point to argue
|
By
caboose9792@...
·
#138064
·
|