If your interested in other glues, google Gluesmith out of San Diego, California. They have a starter kit that includes thin and gap filler, the accelerant and the key to a project I am working on

On 6/9/2015 4:35 PM, destorzek@... [STMFC] wrote: I believe this was called the Mickey Mouse law. -- Jon MillerFor me time stopped in 1941Digitrax Chief/Zephyr

Guys, I will note that the message by Mike Bauers regarding copyright is not only out of scope but is part of a terminated thread. Not good. If anyone plans to continue with comments concerning this

Copyright may be a real headache in the near future when The Feds hand off The Internet to International Control..... As seems to be happening. Copyright will have a wholly different set of

This could be narrow gauge mine locomotive trackage. A variety of gauges were laid in and around the anthracite mines. Wayne Dzwonchyk On 06/10/15, stevecaple@... [STMFC] wrote: I don't

Steve, On the C&O's Goshen (three-rail) Branch, the 3-foot narrow gauged line shared one track with the standard gauged line from 1880s through pre-WW1. Apparently the branch-line rails were close

I don't know enough about the DL&W to say anything about whether or not they ever had interchange with a 3 ft narrow gauge road. Only that the proportion of the track gauges fits the ratio of 36" to

> Bill has just admitted in front ofthe 1,970 members of the STMFC list that he copied my original work. Now,what am I to do about it? > Dennis Storzek Dennis Nothing at all. Bill owns the copyright

---In STMFC@..., <riverman_vt@...> wrote : I also disagree with "there isn't much he can do about it" and it doesn't take an attorney to do so if you can simply understand what you read in a

John, I fully endorse what you have written. I have been using “Locktite Super Glue,” not the professional versions you have, which I bought in the local hardware/lumberyard store. It behaves as

I am cross-posting this on this group and the PRR Modeling group. I have been a long-time user of the various Zap super glues (CA adhesive), but recently ran out and did not feel like driving all

Dennis Storzek wrote: "It did not used to be a problem because until 1978 (when just about anything worth photographing was gone anyway) there was no such thing as an automatic copyright. If the

Well, having exhausted my knowledge of the originations of copyright, and with my statement that the STMFC is not going to police the web OFF the STMFC with regard to photos either copyrighted or not

Haven't seen everything posted on this subject. Have many slides purchased thru the internet & RR shows. Are there any copyright problems posting copies of those on this site? Andy Jackson Bellflower

To add to Dennis comment on the 1978… much of the impetus to change the law in 1978 came from the Walt Disney Corporation who did not want to see Mickey Mouse fall into the public Domain. Prior to

IMO “Fair Use” is not defined and therefore is subject to the whims of going to court to find out. There are a WHOLE LOT of businesses out there who are fraudulently asserting they hold rights

Thank you… best summary I’ve seen. That said the length of protection offered by this law is a stinking, steaming heap of bovine processed grass. Dave Nelson

I also only view messages from the web and cannot see the photo. I get a "blank" square that I assume is where the image was inserted. Bob Witt

You realize, Steve, that this is NOT the Erie, but the DL&W. Schuyler

Doug Harding says: "I also received the photo as part of the body of the text. Interesting indeed considering the group does not allow attachments. If we can imbed photos that will change the game