|
Re: Early "Improved Steel" roofs
Al, the reference is to the sides.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Al, the reference is to the sides.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
By
Eric Lombard
·
#117967
·
|
|
Re: Early "Improved Steel" roofs
Eric, when you say "pattern" and "sheathing", do those refer to the roof or the sides?
Thanks,
Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
Eric, when you say "pattern" and "sheathing", do those refer to the roof or the sides?
Thanks,
Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
|
By
al_brown03
·
#117966
·
|
|
Re: Early "Improved Steel" roofs
Doug, I can certainly see that now! Thanks for educating me. The table I
just uploaded is fine: "Early Improved Steel roofs". Too bad one can't
stick small formatted text bits into the
Doug, I can certainly see that now! Thanks for educating me. The table I
just uploaded is fine: "Early Improved Steel roofs". Too bad one can't
stick small formatted text bits into the
|
By
Eric Lombard
·
#117965
·
|
|
Re: Early "Improved Steel" roofs
Eric, Yahoo converts all group messages to plain text. It removes all
formatting, including tabs, in the process. Which is why we see some
wonderful "text art" in some messages. You can create the
Eric, Yahoo converts all group messages to plain text. It removes all
formatting, including tabs, in the process. Which is why we see some
wonderful "text art" in some messages. You can create the
|
By
Douglas Harding
·
#117964
·
|
|
Re: Early "Improved Steel" roofs
What a mess... Uploading a table to files: "Early Improved Steel roofs"
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
What a mess... Uploading a table to files: "Early Improved Steel roofs"
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
By
Eric Lombard
·
#117963
·
|
|
Re: Early "Improved Steel" roofs
Well, I can see that the table did not work AT ALL! The new interface leads one to believe tables work just fine. Doesn't seem to be so. Here is another try in straight text format and in making
Well, I can see that the table did not work AT ALL! The new interface leads one to believe tables work just fine. Doesn't seem to be so. Here is another try in straight text format and in making
|
By
Eric Lombard
·
#117962
·
|
|
Re: KCS SS boxcar
Dennis Storzek wrote:
The quote over my name is Eric Lombard's, not mine, and I entirely agree with Dennis about the importance of solid steel roofs, which were mechanically far stiffer, simpler
Dennis Storzek wrote:
The quote over my name is Eric Lombard's, not mine, and I entirely agree with Dennis about the importance of solid steel roofs, which were mechanically far stiffer, simpler
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#117961
·
|
|
Car roofs [Was: KCS SS boxcar]
Eric Lombard wrote:
Richard Hendrickson may wish to chime in on this, as I know he has researched it extensively, but I would urge GREAT caution in any interpretation of the word "improved." In the
Eric Lombard wrote:
Richard Hendrickson may wish to chime in on this, as I know he has researched it extensively, but I would urge GREAT caution in any interpretation of the word "improved." In the
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#117960
·
|
|
Early "Improved Steel" roofs
Hello Everyone, I would be very interested in the collective
knowledge of the group about early "Improved Steel" roofs. Here is a
small table taken from my database which indicates the
Hello Everyone, I would be very interested in the collective
knowledge of the group about early "Improved Steel" roofs. Here is a
small table taken from my database which indicates the
|
By
Eric Lombard
·
#117959
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Re: KCS SS boxcar (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Great info, guys!
I ran into some of the correspondence of the PRR, when they were running through the whole "what should we do" thing on roofs c.thirties,
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Great info, guys!
I ran into some of the correspondence of the PRR, when they were running through the whole "what should we do" thing on roofs c.thirties,
|
By
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
·
#117958
·
|
|
Re: KCS SS boxcar
--- In STMFC@..., <tony@...> wrote:
As early as 1932, the Standard Railway Equipment Co. called the paneled roofs "Solidsteel" also. I don't believe the
--- In STMFC@..., <tony@...> wrote:
As early as 1932, the Standard Railway Equipment Co. called the paneled roofs "Solidsteel" also. I don't believe the
|
By
destorzek@...
·
#117957
·
|
|
Re: KCS SS boxcar
Rick , Tony...
The cars were built 1923-24 and one would be safe, I think, in going with a
"Murphy Solidsteel" roof as diagrammed in this reproduction in the Carmen's
Journal, 1921, Vol. 26:
Rick , Tony...
The cars were built 1923-24 and one would be safe, I think, in going with a
"Murphy Solidsteel" roof as diagrammed in this reproduction in the Carmen's
Journal, 1921, Vol. 26:
|
By
Eric Lombard
·
#117956
·
|
|
Re: KCS SS boxcar
Eric Lombard wrote:
As early as 1932, the Standard Railway Equipment Co. called the paneled roofs "Aolidsteel" also. I don't believe the name is associated with absence of panels.
Tony Thompson
Eric Lombard wrote:
As early as 1932, the Standard Railway Equipment Co. called the paneled roofs "Aolidsteel" also. I don't believe the name is associated with absence of panels.
Tony Thompson
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#117955
·
|
|
Re: KCS SS boxcar
And Good Morning to you, Rick.. According to the a KCS equipment diagram
for that series, the cars had "Murphy Solidsteel" roofs. The Solidsteel
roof (one word) lacked the raised panel between the
And Good Morning to you, Rick.. According to the a KCS equipment diagram
for that series, the cars had "Murphy Solidsteel" roofs. The Solidsteel
roof (one word) lacked the raised panel between the
|
By
Eric Lombard
·
#117954
·
|
|
KCS SS boxcar
Good morning all,
Can anyone in the group tell me what type of roof was used on the Kansas City Southern boxcars in the 16000-16499 series. These cars had 7/7 ends and were single sheathed. A photo
Good morning all,
Can anyone in the group tell me what type of roof was used on the Kansas City Southern boxcars in the 16000-16499 series. These cars had 7/7 ends and were single sheathed. A photo
|
By
rdietrichson
·
#117953
·
|
|
Milk Car Placards
Seems that there is some sort of temporal distortion on my STMFC feed since
I read the reply to this message earlier today. ;>)
Still, the idea posted then was a good one. I would use a piece of
Seems that there is some sort of temporal distortion on my STMFC feed since
I read the reply to this message earlier today. ;>)
Still, the idea posted then was a good one. I would use a piece of
|
By
Malcolm H. Houck
·
#117952
·
|
|
Re: MKT Single Sheathed boxcars
Thanks Richard. I have the mineral red car but was wondering if I could
justify the cool yellow one. I think I have the correct car.
fenton wells
rhendrickson@...> wrote:
--
Fenton
Thanks Richard. I have the mineral red car but was wondering if I could
justify the cool yellow one. I think I have the correct car.
fenton wells
rhendrickson@...> wrote:
--
Fenton
|
By
O Fenton Wells
·
#117951
·
|
|
Re: C of G 40' door and a half cars
Richard, I have never been able to determine the reason the C of G purchased so many to these cars with the 10' door and a half opening. Do you have information stating they were bought
Richard, I have never been able to determine the reason the C of G purchased so many to these cars with the 10' door and a half opening. Do you have information stating they were bought
|
By
Todd Horton
·
#117950
·
|
|
GM&O 1940 ACF Boxcars 8000-8999
I cleaned my workbench and found minikit from Sunshine for this series of
cars for the GM&O (also 5000-5683). I had painted the car but not decaled it
yet. The minikit instructions show a Bill Welch
I cleaned my workbench and found minikit from Sunshine for this series of
cars for the GM&O (also 5000-5683). I had painted the car but not decaled it
yet. The minikit instructions show a Bill Welch
|
By
Brian Carlson
·
#117949
·
|
|
Re: Microscale's "Micro Flat"
Don,
Seems that there is some sort of temporal distortion on my STMFC feed since
I read the reply to this message earlier tody. ;>)
Still, the idea posted then was a good one. I would use a
Don,
Seems that there is some sort of temporal distortion on my STMFC feed since
I read the reply to this message earlier tody. ;>)
Still, the idea posted then was a good one. I would use a
|
By
Bill Schneider
·
#117948
·
|