|
Re: Roller Bearing advantage
Mike,
I hope my latest post does not drive you beyond a six pack....
This seems like a good starting point for 1942. What surprised me from reviewing the car builder's cyclopedia was the immersion
Mike,
I hope my latest post does not drive you beyond a six pack....
This seems like a good starting point for 1942. What surprised me from reviewing the car builder's cyclopedia was the immersion
|
By
devansprr
·
#108532
·
|
|
Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Much appreciate the clarification, Richard. I confess to being one of those who has used the term incorrectly, most likely because of its general usage. Proof again that if you tell an untruth often
Much appreciate the clarification, Richard. I confess to being one of those who has used the term incorrectly, most likely because of its general usage. Proof again that if you tell an untruth often
|
By
atsfnut <michaelEGross@...>
·
#108531
·
|
|
Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Tony,
A fair point. My 1940 Car builders cyc is actually rather schizophrenic on this - if we want to adopt a clear naming convention based on the prototype of our era - I believe the term is "We're
Tony,
A fair point. My 1940 Car builders cyc is actually rather schizophrenic on this - if we want to adopt a clear naming convention based on the prototype of our era - I believe the term is "We're
|
By
devansprr
·
#108530
·
|
|
Re: KCS Covered Hoppers series 29600-29649 and 29650-29749
Lloyd,
I cannot answer your questions about how and where these cars were used but will share some information about them.
I have 3 photos of these four-bay covered hopper cars. One is a Pullman
Lloyd,
I cannot answer your questions about how and where these cars were used but will share some information about them.
I have 3 photos of these four-bay covered hopper cars. One is a Pullman
|
By
Ed Hawkins
·
#108529
·
|
|
Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Dave Evans wrote:
I urge you to check any Car Builders Cyc in the period of this list. The definitions for railroad use are quite clear.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press,
Dave Evans wrote:
I urge you to check any Car Builders Cyc in the period of this list. The definitions for railroad use are quite clear.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press,
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#108528
·
|
|
Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Sorry Tony,
The Mechanical Engineer's definition of "journal" is that portion of the shaft that rotates within a bearing, AND the relative motion between the two is sliding. There is NO sliding
Sorry Tony,
The Mechanical Engineer's definition of "journal" is that portion of the shaft that rotates within a bearing, AND the relative motion between the two is sliding. There is NO sliding
|
By
devansprr
·
#108527
·
|
|
Roller Bearing advantage
Well...what the hell...everyone else seems to have commented on some part of this subject so why not me?
From The Steam Locomotive by Ralph Johnson, Chief Engineer of Baldwin Locomotive Works, 1942,
Well...what the hell...everyone else seems to have commented on some part of this subject so why not me?
From The Steam Locomotive by Ralph Johnson, Chief Engineer of Baldwin Locomotive Works, 1942,
|
By
Mikebrock
·
#108526
·
|
|
Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Very enlightening Dave and thanks for posting.
It would seem to me that the speed at which the oil layer would establish
itself would depend on how much weight was riding of the bearings. With
Very enlightening Dave and thanks for posting.
It would seem to me that the speed at which the oil layer would establish
itself would depend on how much weight was riding of the bearings. With
|
By
John Hagen <sprinthag@...>
·
#108525
·
|
|
Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Dave Evans wrote:
Nope. These bearings are journal bearings because they bear on the axle journals. The journal is the part of the axle that the bearings ride on. It does not matter whether
Dave Evans wrote:
Nope. These bearings are journal bearings because they bear on the axle journals. The journal is the part of the axle that the bearings ride on. It does not matter whether
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#108524
·
|
|
Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Gentlemen,
If we wish to be precise, then the term solid bearing is incorrect, and in fact does not appear in engineering mechanics texts.
The bearings we are discussing are "journal" bearings, and
Gentlemen,
If we wish to be precise, then the term solid bearing is incorrect, and in fact does not appear in engineering mechanics texts.
The bearings we are discussing are "journal" bearings, and
|
By
devansprr
·
#108523
·
|
|
Re: KCS Covered Hoppers series 29600-29649 and 29650-29749
lloyd keyser wrote:
Certainly pre-PS-2, as that design did not come into being until some years past 1946. They would also have had square hatches. In that day, covered hoppers were very
lloyd keyser wrote:
Certainly pre-PS-2, as that design did not come into being until some years past 1946. They would also have had square hatches. In that day, covered hoppers were very
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#108522
·
|
|
KCS Covered Hoppers series 29600-29649 and 29650-29749
These four bay 40'-2" cars, built in 1946, were slab side all riveted construction. Possibly pre PS2 all welded cars? Originally delivered in black with white lettering. They had a "Load Limit
These four bay 40'-2" cars, built in 1946, were slab side all riveted construction. Possibly pre PS2 all welded cars? Originally delivered in black with white lettering. They had a "Load Limit
|
By
lloyd keyser
·
#108521
·
|
|
Re: Throwing Turnouts, was Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
For sure, for sure good buddy. (:-)
Back in steam days freight cars were always being shuffled in and out of
turnout yards.
John Hagen
From: STMFC@...
For sure, for sure good buddy. (:-)
Back in steam days freight cars were always being shuffled in and out of
turnout yards.
John Hagen
From: STMFC@...
|
By
John Hagen <sprinthag@...>
·
#108520
·
|
|
Re: Throwing Turnouts, was Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Does this boring exchange have anything to do with freight cars?(:))
Staffan Ehnbom
Does this boring exchange have anything to do with freight cars?(:))
Staffan Ehnbom
|
By
Staffan Ehnbom <staffan.ehnbom@...>
·
#108519
·
|
|
Re: Throwing Turnouts, was Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Ya, than how come I have a femailman?
Joel
Ya, than how come I have a femailman?
Joel
|
By
Joel Holmes <lehighvalley@...>
·
#108518
·
|
|
Re: Throwing Turnouts, was Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Joel,
That's "Turnout person" nowadays.
John Hagen
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Joel
Holmes
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:54 PM
To:
Joel,
That's "Turnout person" nowadays.
John Hagen
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Joel
Holmes
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:54 PM
To:
|
By
John Hagen <sprinthag@...>
·
#108517
·
|
|
Throwing Turnouts, was Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Few people modeled things to that degree of accuracy back then... But, the electro-mechanical device that operated the switch points was always called a "switch machine", same term as applied to power
Few people modeled things to that degree of accuracy back then... But, the electro-mechanical device that operated the switch points was always called a "switch machine", same term as applied to power
|
By
Dennis Storzek
·
#108516
·
|
|
Re: Throwing Turnouts, was Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Ya, but you will also need some turnoutmen.
Joel Holmes
Ya, but you will also need some turnoutmen.
Joel Holmes
|
By
Joel Holmes <lehighvalley@...>
·
#108515
·
|
|
Re: Throwing Turnouts, was Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
So when I finally finish my HO model of the GB&W 0-6-0 #145 I should refer
to it as a "turnout engine?"
I've been following all this and I was somewhat surprised that there is such
a term used on
So when I finally finish my HO model of the GB&W 0-6-0 #145 I should refer
to it as a "turnout engine?"
I've been following all this and I was somewhat surprised that there is such
a term used on
|
By
John Hagen <sprinthag@...>
·
#108514
·
|
|
Throwing Turnouts, was Re: Truck bearings: Solid vs. RB
Thank you Dennis, you beat me to it.
Richard Wilkens
Thank you Dennis, you beat me to it.
Richard Wilkens
|
By
Richard Wilkens <railsnw@...>
·
#108513
·
|