|
Re: Essential Freight cars
STMFCers::
In a related matter, I often wonder if there wouldn't considerable interest in
compiling these in book (electronic or print) form.
Thoughts?
.vp
________________________________
To:
STMFCers::
In a related matter, I often wonder if there wouldn't considerable interest in
compiling these in book (electronic or print) form.
Thoughts?
.vp
________________________________
To:
|
By
VINCE PUGLIESE
·
#97262
·
|
|
Essential Freight cars
I am building a Westerfield Southern SU boxcar. I see that it was the subject of essential freight car series #11 by Ted Cullota. This was in RMC May of 2004.
Does anyone have a spare copy to sell me
I am building a Westerfield Southern SU boxcar. I see that it was the subject of essential freight car series #11 by Ted Cullota. This was in RMC May of 2004.
Does anyone have a spare copy to sell me
|
By
Ned Carey <nedspam@...>
·
#97261
·
|
|
Re: LRX reporting mark
Charlie Morrill wrote:
Certainly possible, but probably not the same cans <g>. Tony
Charlie Morrill wrote:
Certainly possible, but probably not the same cans <g>. Tony
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#97259
·
|
|
Re: LRX reporting mark
I have photos of LRX cars if they would be useful.
Richard Hendrickson
I have photos of LRX cars if they would be useful.
Richard Hendrickson
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#97260
·
|
|
Re: LRX reporting mark
Would it be possible that the car was intended to be reused by the cannery as an insulated car to ship out canned goods?
Charlie
Would it be possible that the car was intended to be reused by the cannery as an insulated car to ship out canned goods?
Charlie
|
By
Charles Morrill
·
#97256
·
|
|
Re: LRX reporting mark
Tony,
The National Railroad Historical Society lists LRX as the reporting marks for Lackawanna Refrigerator Line (Merchants Despatch Transportation Corp.).
Rich Orr
Tony,
The National Railroad Historical Society lists LRX as the reporting marks for Lackawanna Refrigerator Line (Merchants Despatch Transportation Corp.).
Rich Orr
|
By
SUVCWORR@...
·
#97257
·
|
|
Unloading tank cars from the bottom
I have been researching the Alma branch of the Santa Fe in Kansas for 25
years. I interviewed all the bulk oil jobber owners/managers and all said
the cars they received were all unloaded from the
I have been researching the Alma branch of the Santa Fe in Kansas for 25
years. I interviewed all the bulk oil jobber owners/managers and all said
the cars they received were all unloaded from the
|
By
Jared Harper
·
#97258
·
|
|
Re: LRX reporting mark
Thanks, Paul. Interesting car, since the load was empty cans going to a cannery. Not a load needing refrigeration or even insulation! but I suppose if they were old cars, maybe they were
Thanks, Paul. Interesting car, since the load was empty cans going to a cannery. Not a load needing refrigeration or even insulation! but I suppose if they were old cars, maybe they were
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#97255
·
|
|
Re: LRX reporting mark
The rrrrest of the story is that the cars with the LRX reporting mark were assigned to the Lackawanna Railroad. They were all wooden ACF reefers of the demensions you mentioned. Big'ns, they
The rrrrest of the story is that the cars with the LRX reporting mark were assigned to the Lackawanna Railroad. They were all wooden ACF reefers of the demensions you mentioned. Big'ns, they
|
By
MDelvec952
·
#97254
·
|
|
Re: LRX reporting mark
DL&W 42'6" SUF refrigerator cars nos 7000-7299, listed in 1-1-50 ORER 293 cars.
Reporting marks were shown as L.R.X. or D.L.&W.I recall seeing a photo somewhere
but don't remember the source. They
DL&W 42'6" SUF refrigerator cars nos 7000-7299, listed in 1-1-50 ORER 293 cars.
Reporting marks were shown as L.R.X. or D.L.&W.I recall seeing a photo somewhere
but don't remember the source. They
|
By
anthony wagner
·
#97253
·
|
|
Re: LRX reporting mark
Tony:
In my Oct 1946 ORER it shows as part of MDT in the 7000 to 7299 number
series with 295 cars. They were an RS car and were 41' 8.5" in length.
Same listing in the Jan 1948 ORER but not in my
Tony:
In my Oct 1946 ORER it shows as part of MDT in the 7000 to 7299 number
series with 295 cars. They were an RS car and were 41' 8.5" in length.
Same listing in the Jan 1948 ORER but not in my
|
By
Paul <buygone@...>
·
#97252
·
|
|
LRX reporting mark
Does anyone recognize the reporting mark LRX? I have it in a 1948 conductor's book, very clearly written, but can't find it in an ORER.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley,
Does anyone recognize the reporting mark LRX? I have it in a 1948 conductor's book, very clearly written, but can't find it in an ORER.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley,
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#97251
·
|
|
Re: B&O Wagontop
Bob,
Thank you for all your information. Next step; place an order with my LHS.
Gene Green
Bob,
Thank you for all your information. Next step; place an order with my LHS.
Gene Green
|
By
Gene <bierglaeser@...>
·
#97250
·
|
|
Re: B&O Wagontop
Gene Greenwrote:
B&O wagontop box car it appears that at least the first two paint
schemes are legit and were in use before 1950. Sincere thanks to all
who contributed to this conversation.
possible
Gene Greenwrote:
B&O wagontop box car it appears that at least the first two paint
schemes are legit and were in use before 1950. Sincere thanks to all
who contributed to this conversation.
possible
|
By
rwitt_2000
·
#97249
·
|
|
Re: unloading a tank car through the bottom valve
Coriolis is always there. Everything on earth at higher latitudes is moving
more slowly than at lower latitudes, relative to a fixed point in space. This
differential rotation induces a clockwise
Coriolis is always there. Everything on earth at higher latitudes is moving
more slowly than at lower latitudes, relative to a fixed point in space. This
differential rotation induces a clockwise
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#97248
·
|
|
Re: 1950s Flat Switching Film
Bob--
This is a very enjoyable period film to watch, just for the STMFC's and other info. But working in the running trades at CN, I don't understand some of the hand signals that the crew are
Bob--
This is a very enjoyable period film to watch, just for the STMFC's and other info. But working in the running trades at CN, I don't understand some of the hand signals that the crew are
|
By
Steve Lucas <stevelucas3@...>
·
#97247
·
|
|
Re: unloading a tank car through the bottom valve
No worries; I am enjoying re-reading Richard's article on double-sheathed USRA box cars!
Regards,
-Jeff
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:15 AM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] Re:
No worries; I am enjoying re-reading Richard's article on double-sheathed USRA box cars!
Regards,
-Jeff
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:15 AM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] Re:
|
By
Aley, Jeff A
·
#97245
·
|
|
Re: unloading a tank car through the bottom valve
Rats! I put the wrong link in my recent message, and compounded the problem by leaving out the year. The articles were in the March and May 1997
Rats! I put the wrong link in my recent message, and compounded the problem by leaving out the year. The articles were in the March and May 1997
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#97244
·
|
|
Re: unloading a tank car through the bottom valve
Via truck, pumped into above-ground horizontal storage tanks. I don't think Coriolus forces were involved.
Tom Madden
Via truck, pumped into above-ground horizontal storage tanks. I don't think Coriolus forces were involved.
Tom Madden
|
By
pullmanboss <tcmadden@...>
·
#97243
·
|
|
Re: unloading a tank car through the bottom valve
Rats! I put the wrong link in my recent message, and compounded the problem by leaving out the year. The articles were in the March and May 1997
Rats! I put the wrong link in my recent message, and compounded the problem by leaving out the year. The articles were in the March and May 1997
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#97246
·
|