|
Re: Reporting Marks: Was, IC 40' box car decal
Guy Wilber wrote:
Thank you, Guy. Specifics always appreciated. But this is yet another case where "standard" requirements were obviously ignored by a number of railroads, since one can find
Guy Wilber wrote:
Thank you, Guy. Specifics always appreciated. But this is yet another case where "standard" requirements were obviously ignored by a number of railroads, since one can find
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#90555
·
|
|
Re: Reporting Marks: Was, IC 40' box car decal
I have a diagram of AAR Standard Lettering and Marking of Cars with a revised date of 1938 that shows 9" reporting marks for cars that could accomodate it. Flat cars were shown as 7" letters.
Jerry
I have a diagram of AAR Standard Lettering and Marking of Cars with a revised date of 1938 that shows 9" reporting marks for cars that could accomodate it. Flat cars were shown as 7" letters.
Jerry
|
By
jerryglow2
·
#90554
·
|
|
Reporting Marks: Was, IC 40' box car decal
Reporting Marks were to be 9" figures and car numbers 7" as first adopted by the MCBA in 1916 as "Standard" practice.
The ARA's 1926 revisions of the "Standards" (as per note 1) specified that 7"
Reporting Marks were to be 9" figures and car numbers 7" as first adopted by the MCBA in 1916 as "Standard" practice.
The ARA's 1926 revisions of the "Standards" (as per note 1) specified that 7"
|
By
Guy Wilber
·
#90553
·
|
|
Re: ACL flondola? glatcar? (was Re: 40 ft gons)
I know very little about ACL flatcars. I just noticed the sides were
different.
Jim
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I know very little about ACL flatcars. I just noticed the sides were
different.
Jim
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
By
Jim Hayes
·
#90552
·
|
|
Re: ACL flondola? glatcar? (was Re: 40 ft gons)
Jim
Am I missing something? Both have 10 stake pockets, fishbelly u/f,
short sides... Perhaps I should have asked "Is this the car Tichy
is -trying- to represent"? (Since the Tichy flat car kit was
Jim
Am I missing something? Both have 10 stake pockets, fishbelly u/f,
short sides... Perhaps I should have asked "Is this the car Tichy
is -trying- to represent"? (Since the Tichy flat car kit was
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#90551
·
|
|
Re: ACL flondola? glatcar? (was Re: 40 ft gons)
Not the same. See the Tichy car here.
http://tichytraingroup.com/images/parts/4040_1_b.gif
<http://tichytraingroup.com/images/parts/4040_1_b.gif>Jim Hayes
Portland
Not the same. See the Tichy car here.
http://tichytraingroup.com/images/parts/4040_1_b.gif
<http://tichytraingroup.com/images/parts/4040_1_b.gif>Jim Hayes
Portland
|
By
Jim Hayes
·
#90550
·
|
|
Re: Weed Spray Trains
Yes, though it's shown in that slide at a much later date than the
STMFC list encompasses. The side sheathing on that car identifies it
as one of the early 20th century cars with steel underframe
Yes, though it's shown in that slide at a much later date than the
STMFC list encompasses. The side sheathing on that car identifies it
as one of the early 20th century cars with steel underframe
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#90549
·
|
|
ACL flondola? glatcar? (was Re: 40 ft gons)
Is this ACL P-11-[?] similar/same as the Tichy kit? Were these
originally plain flat cars and then converted to this?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150447285148
Tim O'Connor
Is this ACL P-11-[?] similar/same as the Tichy kit? Were these
originally plain flat cars and then converted to this?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150447285148
Tim O'Connor
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#90548
·
|
|
Re: Weed Spray Trains
Santa Fe had at least 9 spray cars, according to Childer's roster:
199201-199203, 199205-199208, and 199904-199905. Most seem to have been
rebuilt from baggage or other passenger cars. There may have
Santa Fe had at least 9 spray cars, according to Childer's roster:
199201-199203, 199205-199208, and 199904-199905. Most seem to have been
rebuilt from baggage or other passenger cars. There may have
|
By
MOFWCABOOSE@...
·
#90547
·
|
|
Re: Weed Spray Trains
For photos of some of the 1920s SP equipment for weed spraying, see page 185 in my Vol. 5.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
For photos of some of the 1920s SP equipment for weed spraying, see page 185 in my Vol. 5.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#90546
·
|
|
Re: Weed Spray Trains
Richard, that probably would be this car:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250638270039
Tim O'Connor
Richard, that probably would be this car:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250638270039
Tim O'Connor
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#90545
·
|
|
Re: Weed Spray Trains
The Santa Fe's Coast Lines had a weed spray train with a retired
baggage car as a spray car and a string of Tk-K class tank cars
assigned to, and equipped for, weed chemical service; I have photos
The Santa Fe's Coast Lines had a weed spray train with a retired
baggage car as a spray car and a string of Tk-K class tank cars
assigned to, and equipped for, weed chemical service; I have photos
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#90543
·
|
|
Re: track oilers
Dennis S. wrote:
I've never heard of this either. Oiling for lubrication at sharp curves, of course, was done in the steam era and ever since.
SP designed and built its own weed spraying
Dennis S. wrote:
I've never heard of this either. Oiling for lubrication at sharp curves, of course, was done in the steam era and ever since.
SP designed and built its own weed spraying
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#90542
·
|
|
Re: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car decal
Hi Bruce and list,
In may railroad experience the coating on rails to prevent brine corrosion was a asphalt/tar like substance, about 1/16" thick that dried to a grey colored, hard coating. I dealt
Hi Bruce and list,
In may railroad experience the coating on rails to prevent brine corrosion was a asphalt/tar like substance, about 1/16" thick that dried to a grey colored, hard coating. I dealt
|
By
Ted Schnepf
·
#90544
·
|
|
track oilers, was: RE: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car dec
I was always under the impression that railroads oiled track joints for a twofold purpose; reducing mechanical wear, and ensuring that the parts would pull up tight when the track gang the joints
I was always under the impression that railroads oiled track joints for a twofold purpose; reducing mechanical wear, and ensuring that the parts would pull up tight when the track gang the joints
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#90541
·
|
|
Re: Merchants Despatch Reefer construction
Dennis S. wrote:
Wrought iron did continue to be used as small parts in car bodies, and in truss rods, for some time after steel replaced iron in virtually all large-scale applications. When
Dennis S. wrote:
Wrought iron did continue to be used as small parts in car bodies, and in truss rods, for some time after steel replaced iron in virtually all large-scale applications. When
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#90540
·
|
|
Re: track oilers, was: RE: Weathered reweigh dates, was: Re: Re: IC 40' box car dec
The Fairmont Railway Motors INC. made a "W61 Oil Sprayer" that could be towed behind a speeder. Consisted of a tank, pump with
small gasoline motor and a couple of hoses with wands/nozzles on the end.
The Fairmont Railway Motors INC. made a "W61 Oil Sprayer" that could be towed behind a speeder. Consisted of a tank, pump with
small gasoline motor and a couple of hoses with wands/nozzles on the end.
|
By
Douglas Harding <dharding@...>
·
#90539
·
|
|
Re: Merchants Despatch Reefer construction
Yeah, I've always considered the center sills and draft sills (back in those days a separate sub sill from the bolster outward), the side sills as part of the body framing, and the intermediate sills
Yeah, I've always considered the center sills and draft sills (back in those days a separate sub sill from the bolster outward), the side sills as part of the body framing, and the intermediate sills
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#90538
·
|
|
Re: Merchants Despatch Reefer construction
In my response I considered the sills as part of the body structure The underframe being the bolsters and the needle beam. I'm in 100% agreement with you on the break in dates of steel. Once steel is
In my response I considered the sills as part of the body structure The underframe being the bolsters and the needle beam. I'm in 100% agreement with you on the break in dates of steel. Once steel is
|
By
Roger Hinman <rhinman@...>
·
#90537
·
|
|
Re: PRR X-29's, NYC Lot 486 and then?
Tim-
Sorry, I was thinking about the topic from the perspective of a manufacturer or importer, not as an informed Model Railroader.
Sad as it is, sales do not follow the prototype. People don't buy
Tim-
Sorry, I was thinking about the topic from the perspective of a manufacturer or importer, not as an informed Model Railroader.
Sad as it is, sales do not follow the prototype. People don't buy
|
By
Charlie Vlk
·
#90536
·
|