|
Re: Update on PrototypeRails 2010
Jerry,
It is an Microsoft Office 2007 Word document (note the ending "x" on the file extension). Office 2007 designed for Vista, is not backwards compatible. you either need to acquire a third
Jerry,
It is an Microsoft Office 2007 Word document (note the ending "x" on the file extension). Office 2007 designed for Vista, is not backwards compatible. you either need to acquire a third
|
By
SUVCWORR@...
·
#85892
·
|
|
Re: Help needed - ATSF stock car paint scheme
Thank you very much Andy, Bill and Richard for your advise. All roofs are brown now and I am looking forward to final assembly and lettering.
Peter Aue
Thank you very much Andy, Bill and Richard for your advise. All roofs are brown now and I am looking forward to final assembly and lettering.
Peter Aue
|
By
peteraue
·
#85891
·
|
|
Re: Update on PrototypeRails 2010
Rich;
<www.openoffice.org>
Downloads for free, works like a champ.
Steve Stull--- On Wed, 10/28/09, SUVCWORR@... <SUVCWORR@...> wrote:
From: SUVCWORR@... <SUVCWORR@...>
Subject: Re:
Rich;
<www.openoffice.org>
Downloads for free, works like a champ.
Steve Stull--- On Wed, 10/28/09, SUVCWORR@... <SUVCWORR@...> wrote:
From: SUVCWORR@... <SUVCWORR@...>
Subject: Re:
|
By
Steve Stull
·
#85890
·
|
|
Re: Update on PrototypeRails 2010
Microsoft makes a Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and
PowerPoint 2007 File Formats. This will allow you to open 2007 documents
with an older version and it is free.
By
Microsoft makes a Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and
PowerPoint 2007 File Formats. This will allow you to open 2007 documents
with an older version and it is free.
By
|
By
Richard Morgan-Fine <allisd1701@...>
·
#85889
·
|
|
Re: Update on PrototypeRails 2010
Can't open the document, Mike. You posted a Word 2007 formatted document which is not backward compatible with early versions of Word. Anyone who has not shelled out the money for an upgrade to
Can't open the document, Mike. You posted a Word 2007 formatted document which is not backward compatible with early versions of Word. Anyone who has not shelled out the money for an upgrade to
|
By
SUVCWORR@...
·
#85888
·
|
|
Re: Update on PrototypeRails 2010
I've spent more time trying to view this than building some of my models (slight exageration). How do we view it? Or better yet, why not just an Excel file like in the past?
Jerry Glow
I've spent more time trying to view this than building some of my models (slight exageration). How do we view it? Or better yet, why not just an Excel file like in the past?
Jerry Glow
|
By
jerryglow2
·
#85887
·
|
|
Re: Wine Tank Cars
Thanks, Richard.
Force of habit, I guess. The first place I ran into these cars (well, the Class X variant with the underframe)the Gregg reprint of the 1906 Car Builder's Dictionary, lists them as
Thanks, Richard.
Force of habit, I guess. The first place I ran into these cars (well, the Class X variant with the underframe)the Gregg reprint of the 1906 Car Builder's Dictionary, lists them as
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#85886
·
|
|
Re: Wine Tank Cars
Most surviving UTL Class V cars were retired in the 1930s, though
some were put back into service during WW II and a few lasted into
the early 1950s. In any case, most of the survivors were
Most surviving UTL Class V cars were retired in the 1930s, though
some were put back into service during WW II and a few lasted into
the early 1950s. In any case, most of the survivors were
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#85885
·
|
|
Update on PrototypeRails 2010
I have placed the latest flyer including an update on the list of clinicians that will perform at Prototype Rails in Cocoa Beach next
I have placed the latest flyer including an update on the list of clinicians that will perform at Prototype Rails in Cocoa Beach next
|
By
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
·
#85884
·
|
|
Re: Wine Tank Cars
So when would a car like this have been removed from service?
______________
J. Stephen (Steve) Sandifer
mailto:steve.sandifer@...
Home: 12027 Mulholland Drive, Meadows Place, TX 77477,
So when would a car like this have been removed from service?
______________
J. Stephen (Steve) Sandifer
mailto:steve.sandifer@...
Home: 12027 Mulholland Drive, Meadows Place, TX 77477,
|
By
Steve SANDIFER
·
#85883
·
|
|
Re: Wine Tank Cars
Richard Hendrickson wrote:
I'm sure this is true, but lest it become accepted that double rivet-row joints = post-1917 tank cars, I'd point out that the double riveting was recommended as
Richard Hendrickson wrote:
I'm sure this is true, but lest it become accepted that double rivet-row joints = post-1917 tank cars, I'd point out that the double riveting was recommended as
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#85882
·
|
|
Bituminous mystery car
There is an old tank from a tank car at an abandoned plant in Owen Sound, ON Canada. Originally there were two but one was scrapped many years ago.
These cars in their last use was use to store
There is an old tank from a tank car at an abandoned plant in Owen Sound, ON Canada. Originally there were two but one was scrapped many years ago.
These cars in their last use was use to store
|
By
PBowers
·
#85881
·
|
|
Re: Wine Tank Cars
Thanks Richard. So that is an excellent spotting feature to
recognize a pre-1917 multi-dome rebuild tank car! :-)
Tim
Thanks Richard. So that is an excellent spotting feature to
recognize a pre-1917 multi-dome rebuild tank car! :-)
Tim
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#85880
·
|
|
Re: Wine Tank Cars
No guesswork necessary. It was definitely a 6,500 gal. Type V (the
smallest of both the Type V and Type X cars were 6,500 gal., not
6,000 gal.). The internal diaphragms were even riveted into
No guesswork necessary. It was definitely a 6,500 gal. Type V (the
smallest of both the Type V and Type X cars were 6,500 gal., not
6,000 gal.). The internal diaphragms were even riveted into
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#85879
·
|
|
Re: Wine Tank Cars
Note that this car was built - and probably converted to a three
compartment car - before the 1917 tank car specs. were adopted by the
ARA. The intermediate rivet courses were in exactly the same
Note that this car was built - and probably converted to a three
compartment car - before the 1917 tank car specs. were adopted by the
ARA. The intermediate rivet courses were in exactly the same
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#85878
·
|
|
Re: Missing links
LR King
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
LR King
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
By
lrkdbn
·
#85877
·
|
|
Re: missing links
car.
LR King
By
lrkdbn
·
#85876
·
|
|
Re: Proto 2000 8K tanks cars - are arch bars possible?
At least through mid-1926, but changed to SUNX by 3/28.
Richard Hendrickson
At least through mid-1926, but changed to SUNX by 3/28.
Richard Hendrickson
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#85875
·
|
|
Re: Re Ventilated Boxcars
Bill McCoywrote:
This fits exactly with what retired PFE people told me in interviews for the PFE book: the receivers of produce typically left all the spoiled or unsold produce right in the
Bill McCoywrote:
This fits exactly with what retired PFE people told me in interviews for the PFE book: the receivers of produce typically left all the spoiled or unsold produce right in the
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#85874
·
|
|
Re Ventilated Boxcars
A friend of mine was a clerk for the RF&P in the tower at Potomac Yard. Droves of empty vent boxes came back south returing to the SAL and ACL at Richmond and were humped into the classification bowl.
A friend of mine was a clerk for the RF&P in the tower at Potomac Yard. Droves of empty vent boxes came back south returing to the SAL and ACL at Richmond and were humped into the classification bowl.
|
By
Bill McCoy
·
#85872
·
|