|
Re: youngstown 4/6/6 doors
Brian,
Don't know if you bought them for the GN 12 panel cars or not (only you can
truly answer that <grin>), but that's what I bought 25 pair for!
Data I've collected over the years
Brian,
Don't know if you bought them for the GN 12 panel cars or not (only you can
truly answer that <grin>), but that's what I bought 25 pair for!
Data I've collected over the years
|
By
Steve Haas
·
#75919
·
|
|
youngstown 4/6/6 doors
I have two pair of Dan Hall 4/6/6 (counting from the top down) Youngstown
doors. I am not sure why I bought these. I think I planned to use a pair
for a GN 12 panel model. Does anyone know if the GN
I have two pair of Dan Hall 4/6/6 (counting from the top down) Youngstown
doors. I am not sure why I bought these. I think I planned to use a pair
for a GN 12 panel model. Does anyone know if the GN
|
By
Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
·
#75918
·
|
|
Re: F-70-7-- possible stand-in for C&EI?
Brian,Shows you how much I know about the C&IE.Quess I'll check my ORER before I offer to help.Blush,Armand Premo
Brian,Shows you how much I know about the C&IE.Quess I'll check my ORER before I offer to help.Blush,Armand Premo
|
By
armprem
·
#75917
·
|
|
Re: F-70-7-- possible stand-in for C&EI?
Armand: F-70-7 is a Flatcar.
Brian J Carlson P.E.
Cheektowaga NY
Armand: F-70-7 is a Flatcar.
Brian J Carlson P.E.
Cheektowaga NY
|
By
Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
·
#75916
·
|
|
Re: F-70-7-- possible stand-in for C&EI?
Jerry,Des Plaines Hobbies released a CE&I boxcar Kit #143 with a Viking roof.They still may have some.Armand Premo
Jerry,Des Plaines Hobbies released a CE&I boxcar Kit #143 with a Viking roof.They still may have some.Armand Premo
|
By
armprem
·
#75915
·
|
|
neat gondola load
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-1/1137438/f991.jpg
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-1/1137438/f991.jpg
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#75914
·
|
|
Re: F-70-7-- possible stand-in for C&EI?
Jerry,
Red Caboose eventually produced the C&EI model, their catalogue no.
RR-32140 and RR-32141. They are presently shown on RC's web site as
being sold.
Regards,
Ed Hawkins
Jerry,
Red Caboose eventually produced the C&EI model, their catalogue no.
RR-32140 and RR-32141. They are presently shown on RC's web site as
being sold.
Regards,
Ed Hawkins
|
By
Ed Hawkins
·
#75913
·
|
|
Re: F-70-7-- possible stand-in for C&EI?
Sorry - I meant to send that direct to Ed.
Jerry Glow
kit.
can
on
Bill
any
Sorry - I meant to send that direct to Ed.
Jerry Glow
kit.
can
on
Bill
any
|
By
jerryglow2
·
#75912
·
|
|
Re: F-70-7-- possible stand-in for C&EI?
I found this old post of yours while gathering info to do my SP kit.
Are any decals suitable to do it as C&EI or can you provide a pic I can
use to do artwork?
Jerry Glow
C&EI
I found this old post of yours while gathering info to do my SP kit.
Are any decals suitable to do it as C&EI or can you provide a pic I can
use to do artwork?
Jerry Glow
C&EI
|
By
jerryglow2
·
#75911
·
|
|
Items for sale
I have several items posted on eBay that may be of interest....
An interesting booklet from the Nickel Plate's Industrial Development Dept.
published in June 1945, great for the modeler planning a
I have several items posted on eBay that may be of interest....
An interesting booklet from the Nickel Plate's Industrial Development Dept.
published in June 1945, great for the modeler planning a
|
By
Rob Sarberenyi <espeef5@...>
·
#75910
·
|
|
Re: Early train length laws
Brian,
It became interesting with join C&O-Chinchfield brouchers with I believe the Clinchfield going N-S and C&O going E-W but have coordinating fast freights No. 95 and No. 97 schedules. I might
Brian,
It became interesting with join C&O-Chinchfield brouchers with I believe the Clinchfield going N-S and C&O going E-W but have coordinating fast freights No. 95 and No. 97 schedules. I might
|
By
water.kresse@...
·
#75909
·
|
|
Re: Early train length laws
Al,
I don't know why they they listed the C&O as North and South lines, but
that is the way it is listed in the booklet.
Brian Flynn
line north" mean heading West or in the C&O Northern (Ohio)
Al,
I don't know why they they listed the C&O as North and South lines, but
that is the way it is listed in the booklet.
Brian Flynn
line north" mean heading West or in the C&O Northern (Ohio)
|
By
bflynnd1
·
#75908
·
|
|
Re: Early train length laws
Folks,
Good find. However, the C&O "officially" ran East-West. Does "C&O line north" mean heading West or in the C&O Northern (Ohio) region? It would be logical for the C&O to have longer sidings
Folks,
Good find. However, the C&O "officially" ran East-West. Does "C&O line north" mean heading West or in the C&O Northern (Ohio) region? It would be logical for the C&O to have longer sidings
|
By
water.kresse@...
·
#75906
·
|
|
Re: Early train length laws
Ben Hom wrote:
Yes, sorry for the confusion.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538;
Ben Hom wrote:
Yes, sorry for the confusion.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538;
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#75905
·
|
|
The Postwar Freight Car Fleet 3rd printing
Some of you may already be aware of this, but got a newsletter from the
Kalmbach Memorial Library indicating that a third run of the Larry Kline and Ted
Culotta book has been made and is available
Some of you may already be aware of this, but got a newsletter from the
Kalmbach Memorial Library indicating that a third run of the Larry Kline and Ted
Culotta book has been made and is available
|
By
bobgang@...
·
#75907
·
|
|
Re: Early train length laws
Tony Thompson wrote:
"Nope. I get mail in "plain text" and it's still full of question
marks."
Brian is correct - it's a result of AOL formatting at the SENDER, not
the recipient.
Ben Hom
Tony Thompson wrote:
"Nope. I get mail in "plain text" and it's still full of question
marks."
Brian is correct - it's a result of AOL formatting at the SENDER, not
the recipient.
Ben Hom
|
By
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
·
#75904
·
|
|
Re: Early train length laws
This thread should be considered out of scope and be directed to OPS.Armand Premo
This thread should be considered out of scope and be directed to OPS.Armand Premo
|
By
armprem
·
#75903
·
|
|
Re: Early train length laws
Brian Carlson wrote:
Nope. I get mail in "plain text" and it's still full of question marks.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
Brian Carlson wrote:
Nope. I get mail in "plain text" and it's still full of question marks.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#75901
·
|
|
Re: ADMIN: Re: George Hollwedel has invited you to join Friendster
Mike,
Just so everybody knows... these are usually not intentional. It's a form of viral marketing. When a person signs up for the Friendster (or similar) social web service, it grabs their
Mike,
Just so everybody knows... these are usually not intentional. It's a form of viral marketing. When a person signs up for the Friendster (or similar) social web service, it grabs their
|
By
Clark Cooper
·
#75900
·
|
|
Re: Early train length laws
Brian: The question marks are a by product of AOL's email program. If I
recall correctly it is a by product of their HTML set up. If you switch to
plain text it should be eliminated.
Brian J Carlson
Brian: The question marks are a by product of AOL's email program. If I
recall correctly it is a by product of their HTML set up. If you switch to
plain text it should be eliminated.
Brian J Carlson
|
By
Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
·
#75899
·
|